• Tiada Hasil Ditemukan

STUDIES ON THE HETEROGENISATION OF

N/A
N/A
Protected

Academic year: 2022

Share "STUDIES ON THE HETEROGENISATION OF "

Copied!
53
0
0

Tekspenuh

(1)

STUDIES ON THE HETEROGENISATION OF SULPHONIC ACID AND GUANIDINES ON SILICA AND THEIR CATALYTIC ACTIVITY

MUAZU SAMAILA BATAGARAWA

UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA

2014

(2)

STUDIES ON THE HETEROGENISATION OF

SULPHONIC ACID AND GUANIDINES ON SILICA AND THEIR CATALYTIC ACTIVITY

By

MUAZU SAMAILA BATAGARAWA

Thesis submitted in fulfilment of the requirements For the degree of

Doctor of philosophy

FEBRUARY 2014

(3)

ii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

All praise is to Allah, the beneficent the merciful, and the Lord of the worlds.

First of all, I would like to express my sincere gratitude and appreciations to my supervisor, Professor Farook Adam for his professional guidance, useful advice and constructive feed-back in the course of doing this research work. I am also grateful to him for the graduate research assistant (GRA) position offered me under the project grant (1001/PKIMIA/ 814127).

I would like to thank the entire staff of the School of Chemical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, for their support and cooperation. In particular, I am indebted to Mr. Zohari Othman for NMR analysis; I also thank the staff of Schools of Biological Science and Physics, for the use of necessary equipments. Thank you all for your assistance.

My study period would not have been the same without all scientific and less scientific discussions I have had with the people from my research group. These include; Dr. Kassim, Dr. Anwar, Dr. Jeyashelly, Jimmy, Jiatian, Salih, Hiba, Wen, Jayson, Siti Farahiya, the post-doctoral Fellows; Dr. Radhika, Dr. Zakiyya and Dr.

Veni....Thank you all for your time and valuable contributions. I am also grateful to the Nigerian students in USM for their support and encouragement.

I would also like to extend my sincere gratitude and appreciation to Umaru Musa Yar’adua University, Katsina Nigeria, for the scholarship given to me. I am also grateful to the Malaysian Government and the Universiti Sains Malaysia for the RU-PGRS grant; 1001/PKIMIA/844041 which partially supported this work.

Special thanks to my mother, younger brother and the entire family, for the support and prayers. May Allah reward you abundantly ameen.

(4)

iii

Finally, I wish to extend my special thanks and appreciation to my wife and children for their patience and understanding while I was away, indeed you have endured for so long. I wish you Allah’s blessing ameen.

(5)

iv

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Page

Acknowledgements ... ii

Table of Contents ... iv

List of Tables... xii

List of Figures ... xiv

List of Schemes ... xix

List of Appendices ... xx

List of symbols and abbreviations... xxii

Abstrak ... xxv

Abstract ... xxvii

CHAPTER 1 –INTRODUCTION 1.1 Catalysis ... 1

1.1.1 Heterogeneous catalysts... 2

1.1.2 Types of support for heterogeneous catalysts ... 3

1.2 Rice husk ... 4

1.2.1 Extraction of silica from rice husk ash (RHA) ... 6

1.2.2 Modification of silica surface ... 7

1.3. Solid sulfonic acid catalyst ... 8

1.4 Guanidines. ... 10

1.4.1 Functionalisation of silica with guanidine. ... 11

1.4.2 Tetramethyl guanidine………...………..12

1.4.3 1,5,7-Triazabicyclo [4.4.0] decene ... 13

(6)

v

1.5 Glycerol production. ... 15

1.5.1 Applications of glycerol ... 16

1.5.1.1 Food Industry....………...17

1.5.1.2 Pharmaceutical Industry……...………...17

1.5.1.3 Chemical Industry………..………...18

1.5.1.4 Acetalisation of glycerol………..……….18

1.6 Transformation of CO2 into cyclic carbonate ... 19

1.7 Problem statement…...……….………...21

1.8 Scope of the study……….22

1.9 Objectives of the study……….…..………...23

1.10 Thesis outline………..………..23

CHAPTER 2 –EXPERIMENTAL 2.1 Raw materials ... 25

2.2 Treatment of rice husk ... 26

2.3 Functionalisation of RHA with CPTES...26

2.4 Preparation of catalysts ... 27

2.4.1 Preparation of silica- sulfonic acid catalyst, RHAPrSO3H ... 27

2.4.2 Preparation of silica tetramethylguanidine catalyst, RHAPrTMG ... .29

2.4.3 Preparation of silica triazabicyclo decene catalyst, RHAPrTBD ... 29

2.5 Physico-chemical characterisation ... 30

2.5.1 Elemental analysis ... 31

2.5.2 Nitrogen adsorption-desorption analysis ... 31

2.5.3 Thermogravimetric analysis / Differential thermal analysis ……….….31

2.5.4 X–Ray diffraction (XRD) ... ….32

(7)

vi

2.5.5 Single crystal X-ray crystallography analysis ... …32

2.5.6 Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy (FT-IR)... 32

2.5.7 29Si, 13C and 15N CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy ... 32

2.5.8 Scanning Electron Microscopy–Energy Dispersive X–ray (SEM/EDX)………..……..…… 33

2.5.9 Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM) ... 33

2.5.10 Cation exchange capacity, CEC ... 34

2.5.11 The Pyridine acidity test ... 34

2.6 Catalytic reactions ... 35

2.6.1 Reaction procedure for the acetalisation of glycerol with benzaldehyde……….………..35

2.6.1.1 The reaction conditions………..…………...35

2.6.1.2 The reusability study of the catalyst ... 36

2.6.1.3 Analysis by gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy…...…..36

2.6.1.4 Isolation of products by column chromatography ... 37

2.6.2 Reaction procedure for the cyclo addition reaction of carbon dioxide to propylene oxide over RHAPrTMG...37

2.6.2.1 The reaction conditions………...38

2.6.3 Reaction procedure for the cyclo addition reaction of carbon dioxide with propylene oxide over RHAPrTBD...39

2.6.3.1 The reaction conditions………...39

2.6.4 Analysis by gas chromatography and mass spectroscopy…….………..40

2.6.5 Reusability study of the catalysts … ... 40

2.7 The chemical fixation of CO2 with homogeneous TMG and TBD catalysts………...………..40

(8)

vii

CHAPTER 3 – THE SYNTHESIS AND CHARACTERISATION OF RHAPrSO3H, RHAPrTMG AND RHAPrTBD

3.0 Introduction... 42

3.1 The characterisation of silica-sulfonic acid catalyst, RHAPrSO3H... 42

3.1.1 Elemental analysis ... 43

3.1.2 The Nitrogen adsorption-desorption analysis ... 44

3.1.3 Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy (FT-IR)... 47

3.1.4 Solid state CP/MAS NMR analysis ... 48

3.1.4.1 The 29Si CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy analysis ... 48

3.1.4.2 The 13C CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy ... 50

3.1.5 Thermo gravimetric/Differential thermal analyses (TGA/DTA) ... 51

3.1.6 Powder X- ray diffraction analysis (XRD) ... 53

3.1.7 Electron Micrographs (SEM and TEM) ... 55

3.1.8 Pyridine adsorption FT-IR spectra ... 57

3.1.9 Cation exchange capacity, (CEC) ... 58

3.2 The synthesis and characterisation of silica-tetramethyl guanidine, RHAPrTMG ... 59

3.2.1 The Nitrogen adsorption-desorption analysis ... 59

3.2.2 Elemental analysis ... 61

3.2.3 Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy (FT-IR)... 63

3.2.4 Solid state CP/MAS NMR analysis ... 64

3.2.4.1 The 29Si CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy analysis ... 64

3.2.4.2 The 13C CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy ... 65

3.2.5 Thermo gravimetric/Differential thermal analyses (TGA/DTA) ... 66

3.2.6 Powder X- ray diffraction analysis (XRD) ... 69

(9)

viii

3.2.7 Electron Micrographs (SEM and TEM) ... 69

3.3 The synthesis and characterisation of silica-triazabicyclo [4.4.0] dec-5-ene, RHAPrTBD ... 71

3.3.1 The Nitrogen adsorption-desorption analysis ... 71

3.3.2 Elemental analysis ... 72

3.3.3 Fourier Transform Infra-Red spectroscopy (FT-IR)... 73

3.3.4 Solid state CP/MAS NMR analysis ... 74

3.3.4.1 The 29Si CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy analysis ... 74

3.3.4.2 The 13C CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy ... 76

3.3.4.3 The 15N CP/MAS NMR spectroscopy ... 77

3.3.5 Thermo gravimetric/Differential thermal analyses (TGA/DTA) ... 78

3.3.6 Powder X- ray diffraction analysis (XRD) ... 79

3.3.7 Electron Micrographs (SEM and TEM) ... 80

3.4 Summary ... 82

CHAPTER 4 –ACETALISATION OF GLYCEROL WITH BENZALDEHYDE OVER RHAPrSO3H 4.0 Introduction... 83

4.1 The effect of reaction time on RHAPrSO3H and blank catalysts ... 84

4.2 The effect of catalyst mass ... 85

4.3 The effect of molar ratio of reactants ... 87

4.4 The effect of reaction temperature ... 88

4.5 The effect of solvents on the reaction ... 89

4.6 The reaction of glycerol with benzaldehyde derivatives ... 90

4.7 Reusability study ... 92

(10)

ix

4.8 The Proposed reaction mechanism ... 93

4.9 Single crystal study from the isolated product ... 95

4.10 Summary ... 100

CHAPTER 5 –CYCLOADDITION OF CARBON DIOXIDE TO PROPYLENE OXIDE OVER GUANIDINE CATALYSTS 5.0 Introduction... 104

5.1 Catalytic study over RHAPrTMG ... 105

5.1.1 The effect of reaction time ... 106

5.1.2 The effect of Carbon dioxide pressure ... 107

5.1.3 The effect of catalyst mass ... 108

5.1.4 The effect of reaction temperature ... 110

5.1.5 The effect of solvents……….………...111

5.1.6 Reusability Study………..112

5.1.7 The reaction of CO2 with different epoxide derivatives ... 113

5.1.8 The reaction of CO2 with PO in homogeneous catalyst, TMG...114

5.1.9 The Proposed reaction mechanism ... 115

5.2 Catalytic study over RHAPrTBD ... 116

5.2.1 The effect of reaction time ... 117

5.2.2 The effect of reaction temperature ... 118

5.2.3 The effect of carbon dioxide pressure ... 119

5.2.4 The effect of catalyst mass ... 120

5.2.5 Reusability study ... 121

5.2.6 The reaction of CO2 with epoxide derivatives ... 122

5.2.7 Proposed reaction mechanism ... 123

(11)

x

5.2.8 The reaction of CO2 with PO in homogeneous catalyst, TBD...124

5.3 Comparative analysis between catalytic activities of RHAPrTMG and RHAPrTBD...125

5.4 Summary ... 126

CHAPTER 6 –THE CHEMICAL FIXATION OF CO2 WITH HOMOGENEOUS TMG AND TBD CATALYSTS 6.0 Introduction... 128

6.1 Liquid phase NMR analysis ... 129

6.1.1 13C MASS NMR studies on the TMG-CO2 adducts ... 130

6.1.2 13C MASS NMR studies on the TBD-CO2 adducts ... 132

6.1.3 15N 2D Heteronuclear Multiple-Bond Correlation experiment ... 134

6.2 Summary ... 135

CHAPTER 7- CONCLUSION AND RECOMMENDATIONS 7.0 Conclusion ... 136

7.1 Recommendations... 139

References………...140

Appendices……….………...154

List of publications and conferences attended………...182

(12)

xi

LIST OF TABLES

Page Table1.1 Comparative analysis on the chemical composition of rice husk

ash (RHA)

6

Table 2.1 GC conditions for acetalisation of glycerol with benzaldehyde derivatives 36 Table 3.1 The results of elemental and EDX analysis for RHASiO2 and

RHAPrSO3H

43

Table 3.2 The result of BET analysis for RHASiO2 and RHAPrSO3H 47 Table 3.3 Summary of N2 adsorption-desorption analysis data for RHACCl

and RHAPrTMG catalyst

60

Table 3.4 The elemental analyses for RHACCl and RHAPrTMG. The C, H and N contents were determined by combination of elemental and EDX analyses (values in bracket)

62

Table 3.5 The elemental analyses for RHAPrTBD. The C, H and N contents were determined by combination of elemental and EDX analyses (values in bracket)

73

Table 4.1 The effect of molar ratio of glycerol to benzaldehyde over RHAPrSO3H catalyst

88

Table 4.2 The effect of solvents on the acetalization of glycerol with benzaldehyde over RHAPrSO3H catalyst

90

Table 4.3 The acetalisation of glycerol with some derivatives of benzaldehyde, over RHAPrSO3H catalyst

91

Table 4.4 Selected bond lengths from the crystal structure of cis-5- hydroxy-2-pheny-1,3-dioxane

97

Table 4.5 Selected bond angles from the crystal structure of cis-5-hydroxy- 2-pheny-1,3-dioxane molecule

97

Table 4.6 Intermolecular hydrogen bond distances (Å) and angles (°) between three molecules

100

Table 4.7 Summary of catalysts used in the acetalisation of glycerol with carbonyl compounds compared with RHAPrSO3H

103

(13)

xii

Table 5.1 The effect of solvents on the reaction of PO with CO2 in presence of RHAPrTMG

112

Table 5.2 The TOF value for each catalyst and their reaction conditions 125 Table 5.3 Comparative analysis of the results of cyclo addition of CO2 to

epoxide using different catalyst system from the literature

127

(14)

xiii

LIST OF FIGURES

page Fig. 1.1 The structure of 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine 12 Fig. 1.2 The structures of (a) 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene and (b)

1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane

13

Fig. 3.1 The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm for RHASiO2 45 Fig. 3.2 The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm for RHAPrSO3H. 46 Fig. 3.3 The FT-IR spectra of RHASiO2, RHAPrSO3H and the differential 48 Fig. 3.4 The solid state 29Si CP/MAS NMR spectra of RHASiO2 showing

Q4 and Q3 silicon signals

49

Fig. 3.5 The solid state 29Si NMR spectra of RHAPrSO3H, showing the presence of Q4, Q3, T3, T2 and T1 silicon signals

50

Fig. 3.6 The solid state 13C CP/MAS NMR for RHAPrSO3H,showing the chemical shift for the three carbon atoms

51

Fig. 3.7 Thermogravimetric analysis TGA/Differential thermal analysis DTA curve for (a) RHASiO2 and (b) RHAPrSO3H

53

Fig. 3.8 The powder x-ray diffraction pattern for (a) RHASiO2 and (b) RHAPrSO3H. Each of the graphs show a single broad absorption peak centred around 27°

54

Fig. 3.9 The SEM micrographs of (a) RHASiO2 (b) RHAPrSO3H showing the aggregate particles of different size and shape

56

Fig. 3.10 The TEM micrographs of RHAPrSO3H, showing particles with irregular shape and randomly distributed. The images, also revealed the sample consist of porous materials. This observation was consistent with XRD results which show that the catalyst is amorphous in nature

57

Fig. 3.11 The FT-IR spectra of RHAPrSO3H. (a) before pyridine adsorption (b) after pyridine adsorption and followed by evacuation at 25 °C; (c)after pyridine adsorption and evacuation at 100 °C (d) after pyridine adsorption and evacuation at 150 °C

58

(15)

xiv

Fig. 3.12 The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm for RHAPrTMG, inset is the BJH cumulative pore size distribution

61

Fig. 3.13 The FT-IR spectra of RHACCl, RHAPrTMG and the differential 64 Fig. 3.14 The solid state 29Si NMR spectra of RHAPrTMG, showing Q4,

Q3, Q2 & T3, T2, T1 silicon signals

65

Fig. 3.15 The solid state 13C CP/MAS NMR for RHACCl and RHAPrTMG showing the chemical shift for the various carbon atoms

66

Fig. 3.16 Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) /differential thermal analysis (DTA) of RHACCl

68

Fig. 3.17 Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) /differential thermal analysis (DTA) of RHAPrTMG

68

Fig. 3.18 The high angle X–ray diffraction pattern for (a) RHACCl and (b) RHAPrTMG showing a single and broad absorption peak centred around 25° for both materials

69

Fig. 3.19 The Transmission Electron Micrograph (TEM) image of RHAPrTMG nanoparticles, showing the statistical distribution of the particles

70

Fig. 3.20 The SEM image of RHAPrTMG showing the surface mophology of the catalyst at 18 K magnification

71

Fig. 3.21 The nitrogen adsorption-desorption isotherm for RHAPrTBD inset is the BJH cumulative desorption pore size distribution

72

Fig. 3.22 The FT IR spectra of RHACCl, RHAPrTBD and the differential 74 Fig. 3.23 The solid state 29Si NMR spectra of RHAPrTBD, showing Q4, Q3

T3 and T2 silicon signals

75

Fig. 3.24 The solid state 29Si NMR spectra of RHACCl, showing Q4, Q3, T3and T2 silicon signals

76

Fig. 3.25 The solid state 13C CP/MAS NMR for RHAPrTBD showing the chemical shift for the various carbon atoms present in the structure

77

(16)

xv

Fig. 3.26 The solid state 15N NMR spectra of RHAPrTBD, showing two peaks at 78 and 84 ppm chemical shifts

78

Fig. 3.27 Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA)/differential thermal analysis (DTA) of RHAPrTBD catalyst

79

Fig. 3.28 The high angle powder X–ray diffraction pattern for RHAPrTBD 80 Fig. 3.29 The SEM images of RHAPrTBD at (a) 3 K and (b) 12.5 K

magnifications

81

Fig. 3.30 The Transmission Electron Microscopy images of RHAPrTBD, showing some spherical nano particle structures. The scale bars correspond to (a) 50 nm and (b) 20 nm in the TEM images

81

Fig. 4.1 The effect of reaction time on the acetalisation of glycerol with benzaldehyde over RHAPrSO3H. Reaction conditions:

temperature = 120 °C; molar ratio of glycerol to benzaldehyde = 2:1; mass of catalyst = 0.15 g.

85

Fig. 4.2 The effect of catalyst mass on the acetalisation of glycerol with benzaldehyde over RHAPrSO3H. Reaction conditions:

temperature = 120 °C; molar ratio of glycerol to benzaldehyde = 2:1; reaction time = 8h.

87

Fig. 4.3 The effect of reaction temperature on the conversion and selectivity of glycerol reaction with benzaldehyde. Reaction condition: mass of catalyst = 0.15 g; molar ratio of glycerol to benzaldehyde = 2:1; reaction time = 8 h.

89

Fig. 4.4 Reusability study on the acetalisation reaction between glycerol with benzaldehyde over RHAPrSO3H. Reaction conditions;

molar ratio of glycerol to benzaldehyde derivative=2:1; mass of catalyst = 0.15 g; time = 8 h, temperature = 120 °C.

93

Fig. 4.5 A plausible reaction mechanism showing the reaction of glycerol and benzaldehyde forming a six member ring isomer

94

Fig. 4.6 A plausible reaction mechanism showing the reaction of glycerol and benzaldehyde forming a five member ring isomer

95

Fig. 4.7 The crystal structure of cis-5-hydroxy-2-phenyl-1,3-dioxane 98

(17)

xvi

isomer, showing a trimolecular H-bond as dotted lines

Fig. 4.8 The crystal packing diagram of cis-5-hydroxy-2-phenyl-1,3- dioxane showing the trimolecular H-bond as dotted lines

99

Fig: 4.9 The crystal structure of cis-5-hydroxy-2-phenyl-1,3-dioxane showing the atom labelling system

99

Fig. 4.10 Perspective view of a trimolecular association of the compound 100 Fig. 5.1 The influence of reaction time on the conversion of PO to PC and

its selectivity

107

Fig. 5.2 The effect of CO2 pressure on the conversion of PO to PC and its selectivity

108

Fig. 5.3 The influence of catalyst mass on the conversion of PO to PC and its selectivity

109

Fig. 5.4 The effect of temperature on the conversion of PO to PC and its selectivity

100

Fig. 5.5 Reusability test on the conversion of PO to PC 113 Fig. 5.6 The synthesis of various carbonates over RHAPrTMG 114 Fig. 5.7 The proposed reaction mechanism showing the resonance

structures of the guanidinium cation which could lead to the formation of propylene carbonate

116

Fig. 5.8 The effect of time on the conversion of PO to PC and their selectivity over RHAPrTBD

117

Fig. 5.9 The effect of temperature on the conversion of PO to PC and its selectivity

118

Fig. 5.10 The effect of CO2 pressure on the conversion of PO to PC and its selectivity

119

Fig. 5.11 The influence of catalyst mass on the conversion of PO to PC and its selectivity

120

(18)

xvii

Fig.5.12 Reusability study on the RHAPrTBD catalyst showing the number of recycled experiments carried out

121

Fig. 5.13 The synthesis of various carbonates over RHAPrTBD catalyst 123 Fig. 5.14 The proposed reaction mechanism showing the fixation of CO2 by

TBD guanidine

124

Fig. 6.1 The 13C MAS NMR spectrum of the tetramethylguanidine 130 Fig. 6.2 The 13C MAS NMR spectrum of the TMG-CO2 adduct 131 Fig. 6.3 The 13C MASS NMR spectra of TMG-CO2 over a range of low

temperature conditions

132

Fig. 6.4 The 13C MAS NMR spectrum of TBD in CDCl3 solvent 133 Fig. 6.5 The 13C MAS NMR spectra for TBD-CO2 adduct 133 Fig. 6.6 The HMBC 15N MAS NMR spectra for TBD-CO2 adduct 135

(19)

xviii

LIST OF SCHEMES

Page Scheme 1.1 The formation of siloxane bond by thermal condensation of

silanols

8

Scheme 1.2 The transesterification reaction of triglyceride with methanol showing the formation of glycerol as by-product

16

Scheme 1.3 Equation of synthesis of cyclic carbonate from CO2 and epoxide

20

Scheme 2.1 The equation of synthesis of RHACCl from sodium silicate solution and (3-Chloropropyl)triethoxy silane

27

Scheme 2.2 The reaction scheme for the one-pot synthesis of RHAPrSO3H.The possible structures of the catalyst are shown in accordance with the 29Si NMR analysis

28

Scheme 2.3 The functionalisation of RHACCl with tetramethylguanidine to form RHAPrTMG

29

Scheme 2.4 The functionalization of 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (TBD) on RHACCl to form RHAPrTBD catalyst

30

Scheme 4.1 The equation for the reaction of glycerol with benzaldehyde, producing 6- and 5-membered cyclic isomers, in the presence of RHAPrSO3H

83

Scheme 5.1 The equation of synthesis of PC from PO and CO2 106 Scheme 5.2 The reaction of PO with water to form 1,2-propandiol as

side product

107

Scheme 6.1 The proposed equation for the reaction of TMG with CO2 to form TMG-CO2 adduct

129

Scheme 6.2 The proposed equation for the reaction of TBD with CO2 to form TBD-CO2 adduct

129

(20)

xix

LIST OF APPENDICES

Appendix A: The FT IR spectra of fresh and reused catalysts Page

Fig. A1 The FT IR spectra of RHAPrSO3H, the fresh and reused catalyst 152

Fig. A2 The FT IR spectra of RHAPrTMG, the fresh and reused catalyst 154

Fig. A3 The FT IR spectra of RHAPrTBD, the fresh and reused catalyst 155 Appendix B: The Energy dispersive X-ray (EDX)

Fig. B1 The area 1 table of elemental content and EDX spectra of RHAPrSO3H catalyst

156

Fig. B2 The area 1 table of elemental content and EDX spectra of RHAPrTMG catalyst

157

Fig. B3 The area 1 table of elemental content and EDX spectra of RHAPrTBD catalyst

158

Fig. B4 The area 1 table of elemental content and EDX spectra of RHASiO2

159

Appendix C: The GC and GC-MS spectra

Fig. C1 The GC chromatograph of acetalisation of glycerol with benzaldehyde

160

Fig. C2 The mass spectra of 5-hydroxymethyl-2-phenyl-1,3-dioxolane (HMPD)

160

Fig. C3 The mass spectra of 5-hydroxy-2-phenyl-1,3-dioxane (HPD) 161 Fig. C4 The reference spectra of 5-hydroxyl-2-phenyl-1,3-dioxane (HPD) 161 Fig. C5 The mass spectrum of 2-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,3-dioxan-5-ol 162 Fig. C6 The mass spectrum of (2-(2-chlorophenyl)-1,3-dioxolan-4- 162

(21)

xx yl)methanol

Fig. C7 The mass spectrum of 2-(2-methoxyphenyl)1,3-dioxan-5-ol 163 Fig. C8 The mass spectrum of 2-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1,3-dioxolan-5-

methanol

163

Fig. C9 The GC chromatograph for the cyclo addition of CO2 with propylene oxide

164

Fig. C10 The mass spectrum of propylene carbonate 164 Fig. C11 The reference spectra of propylene carbonate 165 Fig. C12 The mass spectrum of propane -1,2- diol 165 Fig. C13 The GC chromatography for the synthesis of epoxyhexene

carbonate from epoxy hexane and CO2

166

Fig. C14 The mass spectra of 4-butyl-[1,3]dioxolan-2-one (epoxyhexane carbonate)

166

Fig. C15 The GC chromatography for the synthesis of epichlorohydrin carbonate from epichlorohydrin and CO2

167

Fig. C16 The mass spectrum of 4-chloromethyl-[1,3]dioxolan-2-on (epichlorohydrin carbonate)

167

Fig. C17 The mass spectra 3-chloropropan-1,2-diol (3-MCPD) 168 Fig. C18 The mass spectra of 3-chloropropan-1,2-diol from the reference

library

168

Appendix D: Crystal Structure Report

Fig. D1 Copy of CCDC CIF deposition and validation report 169

Table 1 Sample and crystal data 171

Table 2 Data Collection and Structure Refinement of the crystal 172 Table 3 Atomic coordinates and equivalent isotropic atomic displacement

parameters (Å2)

173

Table 4 Bond lengths (Å) 175

(22)

xxi

Table 5 Bond angles (°) 176

Table 6 Torsion angles (°) 178

Table 7 Anisotropic atomic displacement parameters (Å2) 179 Table 8 Hydrogen atomic coordinates and isotropic atomic displacement

parameters (Å2)

180

(23)

xxii

LIST OF SYMBOLS AND ABBREBIATIONS

APTS (3-aminopropyl)trimethoxysilane BJH Barrett, Joyner and Halenda BET Branauer Emmet Tyler

CCDC Cambridge crystallographic data centre

CHN Carbon, Hydrogen and Nitrogen elemental analysis CEC Cation exchange capacity

CO2 Carbon dioxide CP Cross polarisation

CPTES 3-(Chloroprophyl)triethoxy silane DABCO 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane DMF Dimethylformamide

DCM Dichloromethane

DTA Differential thermal analysis ECHC Epichlorohydrin carbonate ECH Epichlorohydrin

EH Epoxy hexane

EDS Energy dispersion spectroscopy Ea Activation energy

Et3N Triethyl amine

Fig. Figure

FID Flame ionisation detector FT-IR Fourier Transformed Infra-Red GC Gas chromatography

(24)

xxiii

GC-MS Gas chromatography-mass spectrometry

h hour

H Hysterisis loop

IUPAC International Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry IR Infrared

ka Rate constant

kJ Kilo joule

M Molar amount of grafted material

MAS NMR Magic Angle Spininig-Nuclear Magnetic Resonance MCM Mobil Composition of Matter

mg milligram

m2g-1 meter square per gram

min minute

MPTMS 3-Mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane MPa Millipascal

MTBD Methyltriazabicyclodec-5-ene NaOH Sodium hydroxide

N Surface coverage

nm nanometer

µgL-1 microgram per litre PC Propylene carbonate

PO Propylene oxide

pH hydrogen ion function P/Po Relative pressure Pw Weight percent

(25)

xxiv

RH Rice husk

RHA Rice husk ash

RHACCl chloro-propyl silica support Rpm rotations per minute

SBA Santa Barbara amorphous SBET BET surface area

SC Styrene carbonate

SDA Structure directing agents SEM Scan Electron Microscopy

TBD 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene TEM Transmission electron microscopy THF Tetrahydrofuran

TMG 1,1,3,3-Tetramethylguanidine TEOS Tetraethyl orthosilicate TGA Thermogravimetric analysis TOF Turnover frequency

TMSCN trimethylsilyl cyanide XRD X-ray diffraction

(26)

xxv

KAJIAN MENGENAI PENGHETEROGENAN ASID SULFONIK DAN GUANIDINA KE ATAS SILIKA DAN AKTIVITI PEMANGKINAN

MEREKA

ABSTRAK

Tiga pemangkin homogen iaitu sulfonik asid, 1,1,3,3-tetrametil guanidina dan 1,5,7- triazabisiklo guanidina telah diimobilisasikan ke atas silika daripada abu sekam padi.

Sodium silikat daripada abu sekam padi telah terimobilkan dengan 3- (merkaptopropil)trimetoksilana. Ini seterusnya dioksidakan kepada asid sulfonik dalam satu langkah yang mudah. Pemangkin asid pepejal telah dilabelkan sebagai RHAPrSO3H. Analisis pemangkin oleh penjerapan-penyahjerapan nitrogen menggunakan kaedah Brunauer, Emmet dan Teller (BET) telah menunjukkan bahawa luas permukaan pemangkin adalah 340 m2g-1 dengan purata isipadu liang 0.24 cc g-1 dan diameter liang 2.9 nm. Ujian keasidan menggunakan kapasiti pertukaran kation dan penjerapan piridina FT-IR mennujukkan kehadiran tapak asid pada permukaan pemangkin. Hasil kajian MAS NMR 29Si RHAPrSO3H mendedahkan kehadiran Q4, Q3, pusat silikon T3, T2 dan T1, manakala hanya Q4 dan pusat silikon Q3 dilemui pada RHASiO2. Mangkin ini telah digunakan dalam tindak balas pengasetalan gliserol dengan benzaldehid. pada keadaan tindak balas tubaih, iaitu suhu 120 °C, nisbah molar 2:1 gliserol:benzaldehid, jisim mangkin 0.15 g dan 8 jam tindak balas penghasilan dengan pemilihan yang tinggi terhadap isomer gelang lima ahli telah diperolehi. Pemisahan campuran tindak balas selanjutnya membolehkan pengasingan tunggal yang telah dianalisis dengan kristalografi sinar- X. Kristal tunggal telah di kenalpasti kristal sebagi isomer cis- gelang enam ahli (cis-5-hydroxy-2-phenyl-1,3-dioxan). Mangkin telah dikitar semula beberapa kali dan tidak menunjukkan sebarang perubahan ketara dalam aktivitinya. Sodium silikat dari

(27)

xxvi

abu sekam padi (RHA) telah juga digabungkan dengan 1,1,3,3-tetrametilguanidina (TMG) dan 1,5,7-triazabisiklo[4.4.0]dek-5-ena (TBD), melalui 3- kloropropiltrietoksilina (CPTES) sebagai ejen pengsililatan untuk membentuk RHAPrTMG dan RHAPrTBD sebagai pemangkin pepejal. Analisis BET kedua-dua pemangkin menunjukkan bahawa, RHAPrTMG mempunyai luas permukaan 527 m2g-1 dan diameter liang 3.7 nm, manakala RHAPrTBD mempunyai luas permukaan yang lebih rendah aitu 326 m2g-1 dan diameter liang 3.6 nm. Analisis CHN kedua- dua pemangkin menunjukkan kehadiran nitrogen, yang menggantikan klorin pada RHACCl. RHAPrTMG telah digunakan dalam tindak balas penambahan siklik karbon dioksida dengan epoksida, didalam autoklaf 500 mL tekanan tinggi dengan pengacau magnet (Roth Model IV). pada keadaan tindak balas terbaik 130 °C, 50 bar tekanan CO2, 0.2 g jisim mangkin dan 8 jam tindak balas penghasilan dan pemilihan untuk karbonat bersiklo telah diperolehi. Begitu juga, mangkin RHAPrTBD digunakan dalam tindak balas siklo karbon dioksida dengan epoksida, dalam autoklaf 100 mL tekanan tinggi (Amar Equipments PVT). Di bawah keadaan tindak balas terbaik 130 °C, 50 bar tekanan CO2, 0.2 g jisim pemangkin dan 10 jam tindak balas penghasilan dan pemilihan untuk karbonat bersiklo telah diperolehi. Kedua-dua mangkin juga telah dikitar semula sekurang-kurangnya tiga kali tanpa kehilangan aktiviti yang ketara.

(28)

xxvii

STUDIES ON THE HETEROGENISATION OF SULFONIC ACID AND GUANIDINES ON SILICA AND THEIR CATALYTIC ACTIVITY

ABSTRACT

The immobilization of three homogeneous catalysts namely; sulfonic acid, 1,1,3,3-tetramethyl guanidine and 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene guanidine was carried out on silica from rice husk ash. Sodium silicate from the rice husk ash was immobilised with 3-(mercaptopropyl)trimethoxysilane. This was further oxidised to sulfonic acid in a simple one pot method. The solid acid catalyst was denoted as RHAPrSO3H. Analysis of the catalyst by nitrogen adsorption-desorption using Brunauer, Emmet and Teller (BET) method showed its surface area to be 340 m2g-1 with average pore volume of 0.24 cc g-1 and pore diameter of 2.9 nm. Acidity tests by cation exchange capacity and pyridine FT-IR adsorption, revealed the presence of acid sites on the catalyst surface. Similarly, the 29Si MAS NMR of RHAPrSO3H revealed the presence of Q4, Q3, T3, T2 and T1 silicon centres, while only Q4 and Q3 silicon centres were present in RHASiO2. The catalyst was used in the acetalization reaction of glycerol with benzaldehyde. Under the best reaction conditions of 120 °C temperature, 2:1 molar ratio of glycerol: benzaldehyde, 0.15g mass of catalyst and 8 h reaction time, significant conversion was achieved with high selectivity towards five member ring isomer. Further separation of the reaction mixture enabled the isolation and X-ray crystallography analysis of a single crystal. The crystal was cis- isomer of the six-membered ring (cis-5-hydroxy-2-phenyl-1,3-dioxane) compound.

The catalyst was recycled few more times and showed no significant change in its catalytic activity. Similarly, sodium silicate from rice husk ash (RHA) was also functionalised with 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine (TMG) and 1,5,7-

(29)

xxviii

triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ne (TBD) via 3-(chloropropyl)triethoxysilane (CPTES) as silylating agent to form RHAPrTMG and RHAPrTBD as solid catalysts respectively.

The nitrogen adsorption-desorption using BET method showed that, RHAPrTMG had a surface area of 527 m2g-1 and average pore diameter of 3.7 nm, while RHAPrTBD, had a lower surface area of 326 m2g-1 and average pore diameter of 3.6 nm. The CHN analysis on both catalysts indicated the presence of nitrogen, which substituted the chlorine from RHACCl. RHAPrTMG catalyst was used in the cyclo addition reaction of carbon dioxide with epoxides, in a 500 mL high pressure bottom stirred laboratory autoclave (Roth Model IV). Under the best reaction conditions of 130 °C temperature, 50 bar of CO2 pressure, 0.2 g mass of catalyst and 8 h reaction time, a significant conversion and selectivity to cyclic carbonates was achieved.

Similarly, the catalyst, RHAPrTBD was also used in the cyclo addition reaction of carbon dioxide with epoxides, in a 100 mL high pressure bottom stirred reactor (Amar Equipments, PVT). Under the best reaction conditions of 130 °C temperature, 50 bar of CO2 pressure, 0.2 g mass of catalyst and 10 h reaction time, a significant conversion and selectivity to cyclic carbonates was achieved. Both catalysts were also recycled at least three more times without significant loss of activity.

(30)

1 CHAPTER 1 INTRODUCTION

1.0 Catalysis

The 2005 Nobel Prize in Chemistry was awarded to Chauvin, Grubbs, and Schrock for their research on olefin metathesis catalysis. Their work specifically highlighted the potential of their research to provide access to ‘‘greener’’ synthetic routes (Anastas and Beach, 2007). In other words, their research stressed the importance of catalysis to green chemistry.

Catalysts are species that are capable of accelerating thermodynamically feasible reactions, while they remain unaltered at the end of the reaction. Catalysts increase the rate of the reaction by providing an alternative route with lower activation energy for the reaction. The performance of a catalyst is largely measured in terms of its effect on the reaction kinetics (Clark, 2002).

In addition to increasing the rate of reaction, the presence of catalysts in reactions offers the advantages of: (i) increase in the productivity (ii) formation of new products (iii) economisation of raw materials and energy consumption (iv), minimise of waste products and hence, protecting the environment (Barrault, et al., 2002). Catalysis has played a central role in the chemical industry from its beginning in the late eighteenth century.

Today, catalytic processes are used to make gasoline, to synthesize most pharmaceuticals, chemicals, polymers, and to reduce pollution from cars and power plants (Smith, 2003). By the 20th century, the estimated total contribution of catalysts in World Gross National Product (GNP) reached ~20% (Clark, 2002). The word catalysis was coined by Berzelius in 1836, specifically referring to a growing body of

(31)

2

experimental data. Half a century later, Wilhelm Ostwald linked catalysis to chemical thermodynamics and kinetics and therefore refined the definition of catalysis as substances that alter the velocity of chemical reactions without appearing in the end products. Homogeneous catalytic processes have been used by mankind for some thousands of years, for example in fermentation (Robertson, 1975).

The immobilization of homogeneous catalysts onto a solid support is a promising strategy to simplify the separation of catalysts from the reaction mixture and provide means of recycling the catalyst. This will also reduce waste and minimise pollution of the environment. However, heterogenization of homogeneous catalysts often sacrifices catalytic performance, which includes activity and/or selectivity (Takenaka, et al., 2012).

1.1.1 Heterogeneous catalysts

Generally, there are three types of catalysts, i.e. heterogeneous, homogeneous and biological. However, among these catalysts, heterogeneous catalyst has several advantages over the others. These include:

• Easy and cheap recovery after use

• Generally considered as non toxic (depending on the support material)

• Easy to handle without posing any danger

• Recyclable for subsequent application

• Tolerate a wide range of temperatures

• Easy and safe disposal method

The most important physical properties of heterogeneous catalysts are surface area, pore volume and pore size distribution. The importance of surface area on a solid catalyst is to provide adequate space for the substrate to adsorb or react on.

(32)

3

Thus, other related properties such as surface roughness, the functional group present, hydrophilicity and hydrophobicity are also important in catalysis. The presence of wide pores in a catalyst, usually leads to small surface area in a given volume of catalyst, which results in poor catalytic activity (Brunauer, 1976). On the other hand, too narrow pores result in diffusion restriction, which could lead to poor catalyst also. According to IUPAC notation, catalytic materials are classified with respect to their sizes in to three groups: microporous, mesoporous and macroporous materials (Pierotti and Rouquerol, 1985). Microporous materials have diameters less

< 2 nm, mesoporous materials have pore diameters between 2 and 50 nm, and macroporous materials have pore diameters > 50 nm.

1.1.2 Types of support for heterogeneous catalysts

Catalytic support in a heterogeneous system refers to the substance, usually solid, with high surface area, to which the active phase of the catalyst is, affixed (Brunauer, 1976). Such a solid could be catalytically inert, but it may contribute in the overall catalytic activity of the reaction system. Good support material possesses the quality of high dispersion and high degree of thermal stability for the catalytic component (Campanati, et al. 2003).

Depending on the internal architecture of the catalyst, there are several kinds of support for heterogeneous systems, which include:

ü Armorphous support: example, metal oxides, silica, carbon etc.

ü Layard support: example, Clay.

ü Microporous supported material: These include zeolites, which are crystalline aluminosilicates having microporous channels or cages within their structure.

(33)

4 1.2 Rice Husk

Rice husk is the hard outer covering of the rice grain. It is an agricultural waste abundantly available in rice-producing countries. It constitutes about 20% of the weight of rice, and contains about 50 % cellulose, 25–30 % lignin, and 15–20 % silica (Riveros and Garza, 1986; Chandrasekhar et al., 2003; Adam; Chua 2004; and Abubakar et al., 2010). When rice husk is burnt, rice husk ash (RHA) is generated.

The burning of rice husk can be controlled to produce better quality rice husk ash, whose specific particle size and surface area are dependent on burning conditions (Nizam, 1993; and Watari, et al., 2006). Sun and Gong (2001) reported that, the combustion of RHA below 800 °C produces amorphous silica. However, some researchers are of the view that, in addition to variation of composition due to burning conditions, the composition of the ash also depends upon soil type and the farming environment (Nizam, 1993; Souza, 2000). It has been estimated that, out of every 1000 kg of paddy rice milled, about 200 kg (20%) of husk is produced, which when burnt, also produces about 50 kg (25%) of rice husk ash (Abubakar, et al., 2010). It accounts for about one-fifth of the annual gross rice production of 545 million metric tons, of the world (Srivastava, et al., 2006).

Due to its high silicon content, rice husk has become one of the major sources for elementary silicon (Hunt, et al., 1984, Banerjee et al., 1982) and a number of silicon compounds (Karera et al, 1986). Many studies have reported the chemical composition of rice husk in different parts of the world; however, most of these studies reported the organic content in rice husk as 72% by weight, with variation in the different constituents (Chandrasekhar et al., 2003). Govindarao, (1980) has analysed some reported data on the chemical composition of rice husk from various countries and gave an average composition on dry basis as: ash 20%, lignin 22%,

(34)

5

cellulose 38%, pentose’s 18% and other organic matter 2%. Due to its high calorific power (approximately 16720 kJ/kg), there is an increase in the application of rice husk as a source of fuel for heat generation, particularly, for drying rice (Della, et al., 2002). However, after burning of rice husk, approximately 20 wt % of ash is left as a waste, and this constitutes a pollution hazard (Souza, et al., 2000) if it is left in the open.

Rice husk ash contains high proportions of silica. Many authors have reported different proportions of silica in rice husk ash, depending upon the burning conditions and the extraction process. Table 1.1 shows the chemical composition of rice husk ash from different authors. It can be observed from the table that, the ash produced from the rice husk burning contains a great amount of silica and small amounts of other elements which are considered as impurities. The most common trace elements in RHA are sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium, iron, copper, manganese and zinc (Foletto et al., 2006). Differences in composition may occur due to geographical factors, type of ground, and year of harvest, sample preparation and analysis methods.

The chemical composition of silica in the rice husk ash ranges between 84.30–94.95

%, with some trace amount of metal oxides such as Al2O3 Fe2O3, CaO. etc.

(35)

6

Table1.1: Comparative analysis on the chemical composition of rice husk ash (RHA).

% Composition S/N Constituents Nizam,

(1993)

Della et al., (2002)

Rodríguez (2006)

Foletto, et, al., (2006)

1. SiO2 92.01 94.95 87.20 94.4

2. Al2O3 1.48 0.39 0.15 0.61

3. Fe2O3 0.40 0.26 0.16 0.03

4. TiO2 Traces 0.02 - NR

5. P2O5 Traces 0.74 - NR

6. CaO 1.52 0.54 0.55 0.83

7. MgO 0.41 0.90 0.35 1.21

8. Na2O 0.63 0.25 1.12 0.77

9. K2O 1.53 0.94 3.60 1.06

10. Loss on ignition 2.01 0.85 6.55 -

1.2.1 Extraction of silica from Rice Husk Ash (RHA)

Silica is the major constituent of rice husk ash (RHA) as seen in the Table 1.1 above. The extracted silica could be utilised for several applications such as adsorbents and catalyst support. Due to its high thermal and chemical stability, high surface area, porosity and accessibility, many organic functional groups can be immobilised on the silica surface, to produce multitude of heterogeneous catalysts (Gupta, et al, 2007). The common way of extracting silica from RHA is by acid- leaching and pyrolysis (Conrad et al., 1992; Real et al., 1996; Yalcin and Sevinc, 2001; Della et al., 2002; Liou, 2006). At acidic pH, gelation of silica is slower and hence sodium ions may diffuse out of the gel matrix and can be washed out easily to produce high purity silica (Kalapathy, 2002).

The effect of H2SO4, HCl and HNO3 on the extraction of silica from RHA was reported by Matori, et al., (2009). The study found that, HCl was the most effective among the acids used, particularly in removing metal impurities.

A simple method based on alkaline extraction followed by acid precipitation was used to produce pure silica from RHA (Kalaphathy 2000, 2002). The method

(36)

7

involved dissolving the silica with alkaline solution at 100°C to form sodium silicate solution and subsequently converted to silica gel by the addition of HCl to lower the pH to 7.

Similarly, Adam et al., (2009) reported an eco- friendly sol-gel method of extracting silica from RHA. The sodium silicate solution was converted to silica gel by the gradual addition of HNO3 at room temperature to lower the pH to 3.

Due to its amorphous nature, the silica from RHA is best extracted using sol- gel process at lower temperature. This is because the solubility of amorphous silica is very low at a lower pH, and therefore, enables the silica to be extracted in pure form by solubilisation under alkaline condition and subsequently precipitate at lower pH.

(Kamath and Proctor,1998).

1.2.2 Modification of silica surface

The general purpose of supporting active sites of a homogeneous catalyst on an insoluble solid is to make a heterogeneous catalyts. There are many ways to make a heterogeneous system, this ranges from mere physisorption (adsorption by physical forces) onto the solid surface, to covalent anchoring. Covalent anchoring on silica surfaces is based on the presence of silanol groups. These silanol groups are of two types: Isolated, which are those with single hydroxyl group attached to the silicon atom (≡SiOH), and the germinal, which are those with two hydroxyl groups attached to the same silicon atom (=Si(OH)2). The silica samples obtained by sol-gel synthesis have a considerably higher population of silanol groups, due to incomplete condensation of the molecular precursors (Coma and Garcia, 2006). When silica is treated at a temperature of about 900 °C, the neighbouring surface silanol groups

(37)

8

condense together to form a siloxane bond [≡SiOSi≡]. The formation of siloxane bond is shown in Scheme 1.1

Scheme 1.1: The formation of siloxane bond by condensation of silanols

The most common methodology used to anchor other molecules on silica surfaces is the reaction of surface silanol groups with silylating reagents (Coma and Garcia, 2006). These silylating agents are chemically reactive towards the free silanol groups on the silica surface (Cestari, et al., 2001). The silylating agents are usually alkoxysilanes with general formula (RO)3Si−R where R is methyl or ethyl groups and R* is an n–propylic carbon chain containing end functional groups such as: amine, halogen or sulfur, or a combination of them (Cestari & Airoldi, 1997).

One of the advantages of immobilisation of functional groups on the silica surface through the silylating agents is to make the functional group resistant to elimination by the use of water and other organic solvents (Arakaki and Airoldi, 2000).

1.3 Solid sulfonic acid catalyst

Acid-catalyzed reactions are among the most extensive areas for the application of heterogeneous catalysis (Sheldon and Downing, 1999). A solid acid catalyst is a solid porous support (rigid or non-rigid) upon which active acid groups are grafted or otherwise incorporated. In the past, traditional homogeneous acid catalysts such as AlCl3, HF, BF3, H2SO4 etc, were mainly used for liquid phase

(38)

9

reactions, but due to some drawbacks such as production of large volume of toxic waste during catalyst separation, and corrosiveness, it makes the process economically unacceptable and environmentally hazardous (Margolese et al., 2000).

Al-MCM-41 was among the earliest solid acid catalysts synthesised, but due to its low acid strength (Armengol et al., 1995), it has been replaced with more efficient organic-inorganic supported materials such as alkyl and aryl sulfonic acid groups (Nakajima, 2005; Diaz, et al., 2000; Lim, et al., 1998; Van Rhijn, et al., 1998).

Sulfonic acid resins such as Amberlyst-15 suffer from low surface area and thermal stability (Shimizu et al., 2004), while zeolites provide some reaction products with high conversion and selectivity. However, these catalysts also suffer from diffusion restrictions, due to small pore diameter (Hermida et al., 2008). These makes them unsuitable for liquid phase reactions, especially with bulky molecules such as 1,3-dioxane and 1,3-dioxolanes. To overcome this drawback, a number of silica supported catalysts such as SBA-15 sulfonic acid (Margolese et al., 2000), MCM-41 sulfonic acid (Van Rhijn et al., 1998), and even polymer supported sulfonic acids (Xing, et al., 2007; Siril, et al., 2007) have been employed in acetalization, esterification, ketalization, and other related processes. This is partly because these catalysts are non-volatile, recoverable, and easy-to-synthesize. These types of catalysts are also generally regarded as “green catalysts”, because of their eco- friendly nature.

The tedious work-up procedure such as several hours of refluxing and use of hazardous chemicals such as tetraethoxysilane (TEOS) as silica source or poly(ethyleneglycol), and cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), as template, are considered as the main drawbacks of this types of solid acid catalysts. In the

(39)

10

present work, template-free, and one-step process was used to synthesize a silica supported sulfonic acid catalyst, using rice husk ash (RHA) as a cheap source of silica, under ambient conditions.

1.4 Guanidines

Guanidines are regarded as organic super bases (Costa, et al., 1998). This is due to the resonance stability of their conjugated acids (Yamamoto, and Kojima, 1991). Guanidinium salts are well known for their denaturing action on proteins; for example, in a 6.0 M solution of guanidinium chloride, almost all proteins lose their ordered secondary structure.

In addition to the electron donating ability of the C=N bond, guanidines also possess a lone pair of electrons which can act as Lewis base. This is why they are used in several base catalysed reactions.

As strong organic bases, guanidines catalyse various types of organic reactions. Among the guanidine compounds; 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine(or N,N,N- tetramethylguanidine, (TMG) is regarded as a typical and fundamental guanidine compound, and it has been utilised in many kinds of base-catalysed reactions.

Another example, is the preparation of pentaalkylguanidines by Barton et al., (1982) and their application in organic synthesis as sterically-hindered organic bases, which are called ‘Barton’s bases’. Similarly, bicyclic guanidines, such as, 1,5,7- triazabicycle(4.4.0)dec-5-ene (TBD) and its N-methyl analogue (MTBD) were introduced by Schwesinger, (1985). One of the derivatives of guanidine, which is refered to as arginine, is found in the side-chain of the amino acid, and plays an important role in the interaction with enzymes or receptors through hydrogen

(40)

11

bonding and/or electrostatic interactions, largely because of its strong basic character (de Assuncao, et al., 2010).

Guanidines have been used both as homogeneous and heterogeneous catalysts in several base catalyzed organic reactions, such as Michael addition (Ye, et al., 2005; Ma and Cheng,1999), transesterification of vegetable oils (Schuchardt, et al., 1998; Serchelli, et al.,1999; Faria, et al, 2008; Meloni, et al., 2011), methylation of phenol (Bercelo, et al., 1990), Aldol and Knoevenagel condensation reactions (Serchelli, et al., 1997), esterification of glycerol (Jerome, 2004) and in cyclo addition of carbon dioxide to cyclic carbonates (Zhang, et al., 2006; Barbarini, et al., 2003; Dai, et al., 2009).

1.4.1 Functionalisation of silica with guanidine

The silica material can be functionalised with an organic moiety using a silylating agent. These silylating agents can be functionalised on the silica either by one-pot process or post synthesis-grafting method. While the later involves high refluxing temperature and use of toxic chemicals, on the other hand, the former is an eco-friendly method and less time consuming. So far, most of the works published indicated the use of post synthesis grafting method for the covalent attachment of organic moieties on to the silica surface. In addition to the variation in the methods adopted to functionalise silica, other types of alkyl silane linkers have also been used to functionalise silica with several types of guanidines. For example, trimethoxysilylpropoxymethyloxirane was used as a linker in Michael addition reactions (Rao, et al., 2003), and in transesterification reactions (Sercheli et al., 1999).

(41)

12 1.4.2 1,1,3,3-Tetramethyl guanidine (TMG)

Fig. 1.1: The structure of 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidine

Tetramethylguanidine is among the different types of guanidines with the molecular formula HNC(N(CH3)2)2. It is a colourless liquid with strong basic character comparable to that of NaOH. Few literature reports have shown that, tetramethylguanidine can be immobilised on solid support and be used as a heterogeneous catalyst as detailed out below.

Faria, et al, (2008) has reported the immobilisation of tetramethylguanidine on silica gel and applied it as a catalyst on transesterification of vegetable oil to produce biodiesel. The catalyst was effective in the transesterification of soya bean with methanol. Using 0.5 g amount of catalyst and reaction temperature of 80 °C, 86

% yield was achieved in three hours reaction time. It was also found to be recoverable and reusable nine times, thus satisfying many principles of green chemistry.

De Oliveira, et al., (2006) has reported a methodology for the attachment of tetramethylguanidine to silica gel by co-condensation process and used the catalyst in the Michael addition reaction between nitro methane and cyclopentenone. Under mild reaction conditions, the result presented an excellent yield of 98 % after 3 h.

Studies on the preparation and use of silica supported tetramethylguanidine and triazabicyclodecene guanidine as catalysts in the epoxidation reaction of

N N

NH

(42)

13

alkenones was reported by Blanc et al., (2000). Results show that, the conversion and selectivity depends on the type of catalyst employed. The same catalysts were also found to be effective in the Aldol condensation of malonic acid with heptanal.

However, the reusability studies for this reaction proved to be poor, possibly due to adsorption of some by products, such as diols at the active site.

The immobilisation of ionic liquid, 1,1,3,3-tetramethylguanidinium lactate on two kinds of support, SBA-15 and bentonite were studied by Liang, et al., (2010).

The catalysts were proved to be excellent for the reaction of methanol with propylene oxide to form propylene glycol methyl ether (PGME). At the optimised reaction conditions, the yield of (PGME) and selectivity towards 1-methoxy-2-propanol over the TMG-bentonite catalyst was as high as 89 and 93 % respectively.

1.4.3 1,5,7-Triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (TBD)

Bicyclic guanidine bases such as 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene (TBD) and 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane (DABCO) are among the class of guanidines with strong basic character.

(a) (b)

Fig. 1.2: The structures of (a) 1,5,7-triazabicyclo[4.4.0]dec-5-ene and (b) 1,4-diazabicyclo[2.2.2]octane.

N

N H

N

N N

(43)

14

Among these bases, triazabicyclodec-5-ene has been shown to promote various organic transformations, such as Wittig reaction (Simoni, et al., 2000). The reaction was carried out in the presence of polymer supported bicyclicguanidine catalyst. Results show that, between 80-95 % conversion was achieved in 1 h at 0 °C.

However, the catalyst was not active for aliphatic ketones and acetophenone. Similar catalyst has also been used in the nitro Aldol condensation reaction. Under mild reaction conditions, high conversion was achieved within few minutes (Simoni et al., 2000).

A mild, catalytic and efficient methodology for the Micheal-type reactions, using homogeneous TBD as catalyst was reported by Ye, et al., (2005). Their study showed that, TBD catalysed the reaction much faster compared to other organic bases.

The cyanosilylation of aldehydes and ketones with trimethylsilyl cyanide (TMSCN) was studied by Matsukawa, (2012). The reaction was carried out in the presence of 1 mol % polymer supported TBD catalyst. High yield was achieved, but the reaction was carried out in presence of CH3CN solvent, and the polymer supported catalysts usually suffer from swelling when in contact with the solvent.

The chemical fixation of CO2 to propylene carbonate over various amine- functionalised silica catalysts was investigated by Zhang, et al. (2006), their study indicated that, among the amine-functionalised catalysts, TBD/SiO2 showed the highest catalytic activity, showing 100 % conversion in 20 h using 20 bar CO2

pressure.

The design of a suitable catalyst to activate CO2 into more useful products must consider energy input, eco-friendly process and simple work-up procedure. In this context therefore, the use of toxic chemicals, complicated methodology, or the

(44)

15

application of higher temperatures during catalyst preparations are obvious limitations.

While a large body of work has been devoted to the study of the chemistry of ionic bases, and their utility in organic synthesis is well established (Simoni et al., 2000), non-ionic nitrogen bases such as guanidines have not been fully utilised for similar organic transformations. In addition to their simplicity in handling, non-ionic bases such as guanidines are also environmentally friendly and commercially available. This is why these types of organocatalysts offer the practical alternatives for several catalytic transformations, such as cycloaddition of CO2 to epoxides.

1.5 Glycerol production

Environmental pollution has been a source of concern for the growing population. Efforts must be made to minimise the presence of these pollutants, otherwise, the effect could be catastrophic. As a result of increasing demand for renewable energy, biodiesel production has been on the increase and by extension to glycerol as well. However, one of the challenges in the production of biodiesel is disposal of the glycerol which is a by-product. Every three molecules of biodiesel results in the production of one molecule of glycerol (Scheme 1.2)

(45)

16

Scheme 1.2: The transesterification reaction of triglyceride with methanol showing the formation of glycerol as by-product. The equation shows that, every three molecules of biodiesel produced, one molecule of glycerol is formed as by-product.

Biodiesel production has created a large influx of glycerol into the market.

The great challenge here is what to do with the glycerol that is produced as by- product. Reports have shown that, every one metric ton of biodiesel produced is accompanied by 100 kg of glycerol as by product (Behr, et al., 2008). As of 2008, it has been estimated that, the world biodiesel production had reached 12.24 million metric tonnes (Lines, 2009; Zhou, 2008). By extension this means that, 1.224 million metric tonnes of crude glycerol was produced from the biodiesel conversion process.

With the increased expansion of biodiesel and the sharp decrease in the glycerol prices, the excess crude glycerol produced must be utilised in the best way possible.

Some of the excess glycerol is utilised for pharmaceutical and food applications.

However, the rest end up as a waste and is largely disposed by incineration (Liang, 2011). The burning of glycerol in power station results in poor energy conversion and inefficient combustion, thereby creating pollution.

(46)

17 1.5.1 Applications of glycerol

The first industrial application of glycerol was discovered in 1860 by Alfred Nobel, during the production of nitroglycerin, which later gave access to production of dynamite (Sudarsanam, 2013). Since then, various reaction methodologies have been evolved for the transformation of glycerol to valuable chemicals, such as, etherification, esterification, acetalisation, oligomerisation, polymerisation, pyrolysis, hydrogenolysis and many other applications (Behr et al., 2008). Below are some important applications of glycerol.

1.5.1.1 Food industry

In the 21st century, the increasing world population faced two major problems, these are; the supply of food and energy. In order to meet the demand of food, the commercial production of fats and oils has increased rapidly. In 1970 the total production of fats and oils was in the range of 40 million tons (MT).This value increased to about 144 MT in 2005. A further rise to about 200 MT can be foreseen by the year 2015. In many such processes, the natural fats and oils are used in food applications to obtain chemical products some of which can lead to glycerol as a by- product (Behr, 2008).

Glycerol is used as an artificial sweetener, which is a substitute to sugar; it is also used as a softening agent in candy and cakes, as a solvent for certain flavours, and as a substitute ingredient in animal feed (Lines, 2009).

1.5.1.2 Pharmaceuticals Industry

Glycerol is used as an additive in cough syrup, toothpaste, skin and hair care products and in soap manufacturing (New world Encyclopaedia, 2008).

(47)

18 1.5.1.3 Chemicals Industry

Explosives - Nitroglycerin is a compound made from glycerol, this compound is commonly used in all types of explosives (Lines, 2009).

1.5.1.4 Acetalisation of glycerol

One of the important applications of glycerol is the condensation reaction with aldehydes or ketones to form cyclic acetals. These acetals are useful in cosmetics (Bauer, 1990), pharmaceuticals (Bruns, 1979), food and beverage industries (Behr, 2008; Climent, 2002) as fuel additives (Mota, et al., 2010), surfactants, flavours, disinfectants and so on (Silva et al., 2010).

Until recently, most catalysts employed for the acetalization and ketalisation reactions are generally, Lewis acids (Umbarkar, et al., 2009) and several types of transition metal complexes such as Rh, Pd and Pt (Cataldo, 1999). Although the use of these types of catalyst may yield good results, however, the separation of the catalyst from the reaction mixture and products may be a strong draw-back, in addition to the expensive nature of these noble metals. Recently, a series of heterogeneous catalytic processes of converting glycerol to acetals has been reported in the literature. For instance, Deutsch et al. (2007) reported the use of zeolite, amberlyst-36 and perfluoroalkane sulfonic acid polymer catalysts, for the condensation of glycerol with aldehydes and ketones. Results of their study showed that, when formaldehyde was used in place of benzaldehyde, high selectivity towards 6-membered cyclic acetal was obtained. However, when the reaction was carried out in presence of acetone, instead of formaldehyde, higher selectivity towards 5- membered cyclic acetal was achieved.

(48)

19

The formation of heterocyclic acetals from the reaction of glycerol and acetaldehyde (in a port wine condition) was investigated by Antonio (2002). During the oxidative aging, the concentrations of the cis- and trans-5-hydroxy-2-methyl- 1,3dioxane and cis- and trans-4-hydroxymethyl-2-methyl-1,3-dioxolane isomers increased with time.

The valorisation of glycerol with acetone over silica-immobilised heteropoly cids, i.e. molybdophosphoric (PMo), tungstosilisic (SiW) and molybdosilisic (SiMo) acids were investigated by Ferreira, et al., (2010). Their report showed about 98%

selectivity towards solketal ((2,2-dimethyl-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)methanol).

A comparative study on the acetalisation of glycerol with formaldehyde employing homogeneous Bronsted and Lewis acids was performed by Ruiz, et al., (2010). Results of their study indicated that, the valorization of pure glycerol and glycerol in water was achieved by reaction with aldehydes to form valuable acetals.

It was also discovered that, homogeneous para-toluenesulfonic acid was more active than solid Brønsted acids such as zeolites and resins.

In general, the reaction of glycerol with carbonyl compounds give acetals as the major product; however, the selectivity of the acetal is usually a function of the type of carbonyl compound employed and sometimes the nature of the catalyst used.

1.6 Transformation of CO2 into cyclic carbonate

Despite its environmental impact, carbon dioxide remains an economical C1 source for organic synthesis- it being an inexpensive reagent, non-toxic and renewable. Its utilisation to generate valuable chemicals has attracted much attention (Omae, 2006; Sakakura, 2007; Sakakura, 2009). In 1800, before the industrial era, the atmospheric level of CO2 was about 280 ppm (Neftel, 1988; Barnola, 1987).

Rujukan

Outline

DOKUMEN BERKAITAN

One way to synthesize pectin is from the extraction of pomelo peel and this research specifically studies the extraction using tartaric acid as the solvent and under

Effect of combining Palm Oil Fuel Ash (POFA) and Rice Husk Ash (RHA) as partial cement replacement to the compressive strength of concrete.. Muhammad Afiq Tambichik 1 , Abdul

All reaction parameters (temperature, time, catalyst loading, and glycerol to acetic acid molar ratio) have been optimized to obtain the highest selectivity to

Sol-gel silica-supported hydrated silicotungstic acid (STA sol-gel), prepared by incorporating hydrated silicotungstic acid (STA) into silica via sol-gel technique, was used

RHA reactivity depends on the amorphous/crystalline ratio [20], and when rice husk was burnt at uncontrolled temperature, it tend to produce crystalline silica and consequently poor

This research focuses on the splitting tensile strength of foamed mortar incorporated with 7 different types of fibres used such as wood ash, pulverized fuel ash, silica

An experimental investigation was conducted to explore the effects of using waste cockle shells as a heterogeneous catalyst on the transesterification process of very high free

Silica &#34;nanoparticles were prepared by &#34;Stober method using tetraethoxysilane as precurSor, and i ammonia) as (catalyst- The silica nanop~icles then were functionalized