EFFICACY OF ABBREVIATED PROGRESSIVE MUSCLE RELAXATION AND ACTIVE RELAXATION TRAINING ON IMPROVEMENT OF ATTENTIVENESS MEDIATED BY TRANSIENT
FEELINGS AND PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL INDICES OF ANXIETY
CHAN SUE MEI
SCHOOL OF HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY SAINS MALAYSIA
2013
CERTIFICATE
This istocertifythatthedissertationentitled
EFFICACY OF ABBREVIATED PROGRESSIVE MUSCLE RELAXATION AND ACTIVE RELAXATIONTRAINING ON
IMPROVEMENT OF ATTENTIVENESS MEDIATED BY TRANSIENT FEELINGS AND PSYCHOBIOLOGICAL INDICES
OF ANXIETY
Is the bona fide record of research workdoneby
CHAN SUE MEI
During the period ofOctober 2012 to June 2013-05-26
under mysupervision
Signature of supervisor
Name and addressof supervisor : Dr. Srilekha Saha
Date : 26th June 2013
EFFICACY OF
ABBREVIATED PROGRESSIVE
MUSCLE RELAXATION ANDACTIVERELAXATION
TRAINING ONIMPROVEMENT
OFATTENTIVENESS MEDIATED BYTRANSIENT FEELINGS
ANDPSYCHOBIOLOGICAL INDICES
OF ANXIETY
By
CHAN SUE MEI
Dissertation submitted in partially fulfilment
of the requirements for the degree of Bachelor of Health Science (Exercise and Sport Science)
JUNE 2013
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
I thank God for this opportunity that given me to do my thesiswith giving me courage, focus and strength to complete this thesis.
I also would like to express my deepest thanks to my supervisor Dr. Srilekha Saha for his encouragement, guidance and support me throughout the preparation of this dissertation.
Special thanks to my helpful friend Ms. Nurfarah Ezzaty binti Mohd Zahir as my co partner who had me a lot during my research study. And also special thanks to all Exercice and Sport Science Officers and staffs of USM especially to Mr. Hafezi Mat Zain and Puan Mazra Othman for their co-operation to allow me using the laboratory and instruments forthis study.
My greatest gratitude to all participants who volunteered themselves to participate in my study.
My lovely thank to my beloved family for all the support during the research period.
Without them, I don’t think I canbe this strong and tough to complete this thesis.
CHAN SUE MEI JUNE 2013
TABLE OF CONTENTS
ACKNOWLEGDEMENT i TABLEOF CONTENTS ii
LIST OF TABLES .v
LIST OF FIGURES vi
LISTSOF ABBREVIATIONS vii ABSTRACT viii
ABSTRAK ix
CHAPTER 1-INTRODUCTION PAGE 1.1 StudyBackground 1
1.1.1 Attention 2
1.1.2 Psychotherapeutic Interventions
1.2 Significanceof the Study 6
1.3 Objectives of the Study
1.3.1 General Objectives 7
1.3.2 Specific Objectives 7
1.4 Research Hypothesis 8
CHAPTER II- LITERATURE REVIEW
A) Review ofthe previous literatures 9
1. Effects of abbreviated progressive muscle relaxation (APMR) 9 trainingon attention
ii
2. Abbreviated progressive muscle relaxation(APMR) 11 training and anxiety amelioration
3. Effectsof active relaxationon attention 15 4. Active relaxationand anxiety amelioration 16 B) Summary of thepreviousliteratures 18
CHAPTERIII- METHODOLOGY 3.1 General Methodology- Introduction 19
3.2 Section A - The State - Trait AnxietyInventory (STAI) 20 3.3 Section B -Reaction Time 21
3.4 Section C - Physiological Measures- Skin Conductance (Sc) 25 3.5 Participants 31
3.5.1 InclusionCriteriaofthe Present Participants 31
3.5.2 Exclusion Criteria 32
3.6 InterventionTechniques Employed
3.6.1 Progressive Muscle Relaxation 32
3.6.2 Active Relaxation (Breathing Exercise) 33
3.7 Study Procedures 34
3.8 Flow Chart 36
3.9 Statistical Analysis 37
CHAPTER IV- RESULTS 38
CHAPTER V- DISCUSSION 49
iii
CHAPTER VI- CONCLUSION
6.1 Conclusion 60
6.2 Implications 61 6.3 Limitations 62
6.4 Recommendations 62 REFERENCES 63
69 APPENDIX A-Letterfrom USM EthicsCommittee
APPENDIX B- Modified Version of Jacobson's Progressive Relaxation Procedure 71
APPENDIX C- Breathing Exercise Procedure 75
APPENDIX D- State-Trait Anxiety Inventory 78
APPENDIXE- Pictures during Research 81
iv
LIST OF TABLES
V
Table 1: Descriptive Statisticsexplaining natureofchanges depicted in differentphases of experiment(forparticipantsof Control Condition)
Table 2: Descriptive Statistics explainingnature ofchanges depicted in different phases of experiment (for participants whoreceived trainingofAPMR)
Table 3: Descriptive Statistics explaining nature of changes depicted in different phases ofexperiment (for participants who received trainingofactive relaxation)
Table 4: Mean of State anxiety for three different groups across the experimental sessions
Table 5: Mean of Simple reaction ability for three different groups across the experimental sessions
Table 6: Mean of Complex reaction ability for three different groups across the experimental sessions
Table 7; Mean of Tonic skin conductance parameters for three different groups across the experimental sessions
Table 8: Mean of Phasic skin conductance parameters for three different groups across the experimental sessions
Table 12: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects - checking the effect of covariates of psychobiological parameters observed in different phases from the participants ofboth of theexperimental groups I & II.
Table 13: Multiple linear regression representing contribution of autonomic predictors (when only participants who received APMRwere included).
Table 14: Multiple linear regression representing contribution of autonomic predictors (when participants who received trainingof Active Relaxation were only included).
Table 15: Multiple linear regression representing contribution of autonomic predictors (when participants who receivedtrainingofAPMRwere only included).
Table 16; Multiple linear regression representing contribution of autonomic predictors (when only participantswho received APMRwere included).
Table 11: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects - checking the effect of covariates of psychological, psychomotor and psychobiological parameters observed in different phases from the participants of the experimental group 2.
Table 9; Tests of Within-Subjects Effects - checking the effect of covariates of psychological and psychomotor parameters observed in different phases from the participants ofthecontrol group.
Table 10: Tests of Within-Subjects Effects - checking the effect of covariates of psychological and psychomotor parameters observed in different phases from the participantsof theexperimental groupI.
LIST OF FIGURES
: Flow Chart Figure 1
Figure 2
vi
Table 18: Multiple linear regression representing contribution of autonomic predictors (when only participantsof control group were included).
Table 17: Multiple linear regression representing contribution ofautonomic predictors (whenonlyparticipants who received Active Relaxation were included).
: Fig. 2.0 Adapted from Saha et al. (2013), explaining combined significance of both Thalamo-Cortical-Amygdaloid (TCA) pathways and Hypothalamic- Pituitary-Adrenaline (HPA) Axis in emotional regulation toward achievement of high attentive performance
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
Adaptation Level ALAnalysisofVariance ANOVA
Abbreviated Progressive Muscle Relaxation APMR
Active Relaxation AR
Beck Anxiety Inventory BAI
Complex reaction time CRT
Competitive StateAnxiety Inventory 2 CSAI-2R
Depression Anxiety and Stress Scale DASS
Group Exercise GE
Galvanic Skin Resistance GSR
Psychogalvanic Reflex PGR
Progressive Muscle Relaxation PMR
Progressive Muscle Relaxation Training PMRT
Reaction Timer RT
State-Anxiety SA
Skin Conductance Sc
StandardDeviation SD
Spontaneous Fluctuation SF
Stress Management Intervention SMI
Statistical Package for Social Sciences SPSS
Skin Resistance SR
SimpleReaction time SRT
State-Trait Anxiety Inventory STAI
TA Trait-Anxiety
USMKK Universiti Sains Malaysia Kubang Kerian
vii
1
ABSTRACT
Thepresentstudy was undertaken with an objective todetermine differential efficacyof psychotherapeutic interventions, namely abbreviated progressive muscle relaxation (APMR) exercise training and active relaxation in enhancing attentive capacity in young active female participants. Twenty seven female students ofUniversiti Sains Malaysia in the age ranging from 18 to 24 years volunteered as participants, who were assessed with dispositional and transient anxiety by employing Spielberger’s State and Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Thereafter, they were randomly categorized into three groups; viz. - Group A- control group; Group B - participants received training of APMR and Group C - participants received training of Active relaxation. All of the participants were subjected to evaluation of transient anxiety; both simple and complex reaction ability; psychobiological measures of tonic and phasic skin conductance
intervention conditions were introduced to their respective intervention training programs following standardized protocol (15 minutes/day; 2 days/week for 6 weeks).
Mid-term analyses (all of the parameters of pre-intervention analyses were repeated) were done three weeks after the introduction of intervention sessions. Thereafter the similar protocol of intervention was followed for three more weeks. Thereafterall of the participants were assessed once again for the post-intervention analyses (following similar analyses protocols). Findings of the analyses suggested that both APMR and active relaxation intervention had beneficial impacts on attentive performance, characterized by psychomotor simple muscular reaction time and on cognitively dominated complex reaction performance. Furthermore, both of the interventions have been observed to result inalteration in the psychobiological make-upof the participants, which finallyresulted in improvements inattentiveperformances.
viii
activity as measure of pre-intervention analyses. Thereafter the participants of
ABSTRAK
Kajian ini telah dijalankan dengan objektifuntuk menentukan keberkesanan perbezaan ?
(APMR) dan relaksasi aktif dalam meningkatkan tumpuan dalam kalangan peserta
Malaysia dalam lingkungan usia 18 hingga 24 tahun menawarkan diri secara sukarela sebagai peserta, dan dinilai dengan kebimbangan disposisi dan transien dengan menggunakan “State and Trait Anxiety Inventory” (STAI) Spielberger. Selepas itu mereka dikategorikan secara rawak kepada tiga kumpulan, iaitu. - Kumpulan A- kumpulan kawalan; Kumpulan B - peserta menerima latihan APMR dan Kumpulan C -
kebimbangan transien; kedua-dua keupayaan tindak balas ringkas dan kompleks;
mengukur psikobiologikal tonik dan phasic aktiviti konduktan kulit sebagai pengukuran analisis pra-intervensi. Selepas itu peserta intervensi diperkenalkan kepada program latihan intervensi masing-masing dengan mengikuti protokol piawaian(15 minit/ hari, 2 hari / minggu selama 6 minggu). Analisis Pertengahan Intervensi (semua parameter analisis pra-intervensi diulangi) dan dilakukan tiga minggu selepas pengenalan sesi intervensi. Selepas ituprotokol intervensi yang sama dilakukan selama tiga minggulagi.
Selepas itu semua peserta dinilai sekali lagi untuk analisis akhir intervensi (yang mengikuti protokol analisis yang sama). Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahawa kedua-dua APMR dan intervensi relaksasi aktif mempunyai kesan positif ke atas prestasi tumpuan.
berunsurkan psikomotor masa tindak balas otot ringkas dan kognitif dikuasai prestasi tindak balas kompleks. Tambahan pula, kedua-dua intervensi telah menyebabkan perubahan dalam psikobiologikal peserta, yang akhirnya menyebabkan peningkatan dalam prestasitumpuan.
ix
intervensi psikoterapi, iaitu latihan senaman singkat relaksasi otot secara progresif
perempuan muda dan aktif. Dua puluh tujuh pelajar perempuan Universiti Sains
peserta menerima latihan relaksasi aktif. Semua peserta menjalani penilaian