The Influence Of River Discharges, Tides, And Winds On Estuarine Plume In Northwest Peninsular Malaysia

141  Download (0)

Full text

(1)

THE INFLUENCE OF RIVER DISCHARGES, TIDES, AND

WINDS ON ESTUARINE PLUME IN NORTHWEST

PENINSULAR MALAYSIA

by

MUHAMMAD SYUKRI

Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the

requirements

for the

degree

of Doctor of

Philosophy

December 2006

(2)

<To 'Very

special: peopfe

inmy

life:

my

(ate mother (/)juairiali Sa6�

my

wife (]Uni Safitri

anti

my

son

CJ{fLuslian a{ 7(p.syjie

!ill

uhammad

The origins of oceanography lie in voyaging

...

(3)

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

As a

long journey

and endeavour, this thesis was not a solo effort. lowe a

tremendous of

gratitude

to the many

people

that assist and

support

me, that it is

difficult to know where to

begin

and end this list. Even after one of the

longest acknowledgments

list ever written in this thesis is

done,

I am sure I will have

forgotten

some

important people.

To you J offer my

apologies

and

implicit

thanks. I would like to thank the

University

of

Syiah

Kuala

(USK), Darussalam,

Banda

Aceh,

Indonesia for

providing

the

scholarship

to

support

my

study.

I also wish to thank

University

Science

Malaysia (USM),

for

serving

and the use of all

facility,

where I learnt so much from

being part

ofa

graduate

student here.

The very

first,

I want to pay

special

tribute to my advisor and friend Dr. Md. Noordin Abu Bakar has served as a source of

inspiration

since the

conception

of this

thesis, helped

me with

advice,

comments and

suggestions.

He was

always

available when I needed his advice or

wisdom,

but gave me the freedom to work

independently.

He

has demonstrated

impeccable leadership

and has

given

me a

strong

foundation on which to build my own

independent

research program.

Insya Allah,

my career as an

oceanographer

in the future will

always

reflect what I have learned as a student from him. Further more, I also would like to thank to Ass. Prof. Dr. Khiruddin Abdullah as a

co-supervisor

for

reviewing

some of the results. Then I would like to extent my thanks

to Dr. Zuhar Zahir Tuan Harith for

guiding, suggestions

and useful discussion

during

my

study.

111

(4)

I would like to thanks the

Malaysia Meteorological

Service

(MMS)

for

kindly providing

the

meteorology

and

hydrographic data,

the

Hydrology

and Water Resources

Division,

Department

of

Irrigation

and

Drainage (DID) Malaysia

for

graciously providing

the

suspended

sediment

concentration,

river

discharge,

and river

stage data,

the

Malaysian Mapping

and

Survey Department (MMSD)

for

pleasantly providing

the tide observation

data, Centre

for Marine and Coastal Studies

(CEMAC)

USM for their

friendship

and all those who

helped

me with

laboratory

work for the TSS

analysis,

Kedah

Flying

Club

(KFC)

for

supplied

aerial

images

from aerial surveys with their small aircraft. These datasets contributed

significantly

to the

quality

of the

work and

study presented

in these pages.

I want to thank the Dean School of

Physics USM,

all staff of

Geophysics Laboratory,

School of

Physics,

for

providing

an

atmosphere teeming

with a collaborative

spirit

and

enthusiasm for the research.

Special

thanks also to my wonderful friends and team works En. Yaakub

Othman,

En.

Jamalludin,

Uncle Abu

Bakar,

for their technical

advice,

who

helped

me with field surveys of the

days

and

nights

and in all weathers.

They

were also enthusiastic about my

project

and made the

days

I

spent

field

surveying enjoyable.

En. Zainul

Abidin,

Shahil

Ahmad,

Shaiful

Mahathir,

and

Faisal,

a

very

special

thank you for all your

help, cooperation,

assistance and

encouragement.

Further,

I would like to express my

special

thanks to my

parents,

Usman Ismail and

(late) Djuairiah Sabi,

and my

parents-in-law,

Soewardi Soekirman and Nur Aini

Umar,

my sisters and

brothers,

k'ina and

b'Samsoel,

k'

Nyanyak

and

b'PoeJ,

k'ida and

b'ljal,

and Ismail for their

supporting

and do'a

during

this very

challenging period

in my life.

Finally, especially

and most

importantly,

to my wife and best friend Rini

Safitri,

and my son and sources of

inspiration

Raushan al

Kasyfie Muhammad,

for their wonderful

(5)

support, love, patience, distraction,

and comfort

during

this

trying odyssey

know as

graduate school,

and

particularly during

that rather surreal

period

know as

"writing up".

I could not have done this without

them,

and dedicate my thesis to them.

v

(6)

Contents

Page

Acknowledgements

iii

Contents vi

List of Tables xiii

List of

Figures

xiv

List of Abbreviations xxvi

List of

Symbols

xxviii

List of

Appendices

xxx

Abstrak xxxi

Abstract xxxiii

1

Chapter

One: Introduction

1.0 Introduction 1

1.1 Motivation 2

1.2

Hypothesis

4

1.3

Objectives

and scope 6

1.4 Thesis Outline 7

Chapter

Two: Literature Review 9

2.0

Estuary plume

structures 9

2.1 Sediment

transport

14

2.2 Factors

affecting estuary plumes

19

2.2.1 River

discharges

19

2.2.2 Tides 20

2.2.3 Winds and waves 22

2.3 Currents in coastal waters and estuaries 25

2.4 Remote

sensing technology

in

detecting estuary plume

27

2.4.1 Innovative

mapping

and

modeling

27

(7)

2.4.2 Other remote

sensing applications

32

Chapter

Three:

Methodology

34

3.0 Definition of the

study

areas 34

3.1 Site

description

and catchment area 36

3.2

Geological setting

39

3.3

Meteorological

and

hydrographic data

43

3.3.1 Climate data 45

a.

Temperature

46

b. Relative

humidity

48

c. Rainfall 48

3.3.2 Wind data 49

3.3.3 Tidal data 52

3.4 Field surveys 53

3.4.1 Muda surveys 54

3.4.2 Merbok surveys 68

3.4.3 Prai surveys 74

3.5

Laboratory

work 81

3.6 Data

processing

and

analysis

81

3.6.1

Mapping

and

contouring

data 81

3.6.2

Density

82

3.6.3 Water masses 87

3.6.4 Water

mixing

88

3.6.5 Validation of total

suspended

solids 89

Chapter

Four:

Muda Surveys

90

4.0 Introduction 90

4.1 River

discharge

influence 91

4.1.1

Salinity

91

a. Horizontal distribution 91

b. Vertical distribution 95

VII

(8)

4.1.2

Temperature

100

a. Horizontal distribution 100

b. Vertical distribution 106

4.1.3

Density

110

a. Horizontal distribution 110

b. Vertical distribution 115

4.1.4 Total

suspended

solids 118

4.1.5

Suspended

sediment load in the river 121

4.2 Tidal influence 128

4.2.1

Salinity

129

a. Horizontal distribution 129

b. Vertical distribution 135

4.2.2

Temperature

138

a. Horizontal distribution 138

b. Vertical distribution 143

4.2.3

Density

145

a. Horizontal distribution 145

b. Vertical distribution 151

4.2.4 Total

suspended

solids 153

4.3 :Wind influence 156

4.3.1

Salinity

156

4.3.2

Temperature

158

4.3.3

Density

160

4.3.4 Total

suspended

solids 161

4.4 Current characteristics 163

4.4.1 In the

estuary

163

4.4.2 At the coastal zone 168

4.5 Discussion 176

4.5.1 River

discharge

influence 176

a.

Salinity pattern

176

b.

Temperature pattern

181

c.

Density pattern

183

d. Total

suspended

solids

pattern

186

(9)

4.5.2 Tidal influence 191

a.

Salinity pattern

191

b.

Temperature pattern

196

c.

Density pattern

199

d. Total

suspended

solids

pattern

203

4.5.3 Wind influence 205

a.

Salinity pattern

206

b.

Temperature pattern

207

c.

Density pattern

208

d. Total

suspended

solids

pattern

209

4.5.4 Monsoon

variability

and

atmospheric temperature

210

4.5.5 Water masses 215

4.5.6 Aerial surveys 217

4.6

Summary

of field surveys 226

Chapter

Five: Merbok

Surveys

234

5.0 I ntrod uction 234

5.1 River

discharge

influence 235

5.1.1

Salinity

235

a. Horizontal distribution 235

b. Vertical distribution 237

5.1.2

Temperature

240

a. Horizontal distribution 240

b. Vertical distribution 242

5.1.3

Density

245

a. Horizontal distribution 245

b. Vertical distribution 246

5.1.4 Total

suspended

solids 249

5.1.5 Secchi

depth

251

5.2 Tidal influence 253

5.2.1

Salinity

253

a. Horizontal distribution 253

.ix

(10)

b. Vertical distribution 254

5.2.2

Temperature

257

a. Horizontal distribution 257

b. Vertical distribution 259

5.2.3

Density

261

a. Horizontal distribution 261

b. Vertical distribution 263

5.2.4 Total

suspended

solids 265

5.2.5 Secchi

depth

267

5.3 Wind influence 268

5.3.1

Salinity

268

5.3.2

Temperature

270

5.3.3

Density

271

5.3.4 Total

suspended

solids 272

5.3.5 Secchi

depth

273

5.4 Current characteristics 274

5.5 Discussion 283

5.5.1 River

discharge

influence 283

a.

Salinity pattern

283

b.

Temperature pattern

285

c.

Density pattern

287

d. Total

suspended

solids

pattern

290

e. Secchi

depth pattern

292

5.5.2 Tidal influence 294

a.

Salinity pattern

296

b.

Temperature pattern

300

c.

Density pattern

301

d. Total

suspended

solids

pattern

303

e. Secchi

depth pattern

305

5.5.3 Wind influence 307

a.

Salinity pattern

307

b.

Temperature pattern

308

c.

Density pattern

309

(11)

d. Total

suspended

solid

pattern

310

e. Secchi

depth pattern

311

5.5.4 Monsoon

variability

and

atmospheric temperature

312

5.5.5 Water masses 317

5.5.6

Mixing

Processes 319

5.5.7 Aerial surveys 324

5.6

Summary

of field surveys 332

Chapter

Six: Prai

Surveys

335

6.0 Introduction 335

6.1 River

discharge

influence 336

6.1.1

Salinity

336

6.1.2

Temperature

338

6.1.3

Density

339

6.1.4 Total

suspended

solids 340

6.2 Tidal influence 341

6.2.1

Salinity

341

6.2.2

Temperature

342

6.2.3

Density

343

6.2.4 Total

suspended

solids 345

6.3 Wind influence 346

6.3.1

Salinity

346

6.3.2

Temperature

347

6.3.3

Density

348

6.3.4 Total

suspended

solids 349

6.4 Discussion 351

6.4.1 River

discharge

influence 351

a.

Salinity pattern

351

b.

Temperature pattern

353

c.

Density pattern

354

d. Total

suspended

solids

pattern

355

6.4.2 Tidal influence 357

xi

(12)

a.

Salinity pattern

357

b.

Temperature pattern

358

c.

Density pattern

359

d. Total

suspended

solids

pattern

360

6.4.3 Wind influence 362

a.

Salinity pattern

362

b.

Temperature pattern

363

c.

Density pattern

363

d. Total

suspended

solids

pattern

364

6.4.4Aerial surveys 365

6.5

Summary

of field surveys 376

Chapter

Seven: Conclusions and Future Works 379

7.0 Conclusions

7.1 Recommendations and future work

requirements

379 383

References

List of Publications

385 398

Appendices

Appendix

A : All results of Muda surveys

Appendix

B : All results of Merbok surveys

Appendix

C : All results of Prai surveys

CD CD CD CD

(13)

List of Tables

Page

2.1

Discharge

data for the world's

largest

rivers. 15

3.1 Field surveys

(date ordered)

on the Muda coastal area. 55 3.2

Summary

of cumulative 5

days

rainfall and river

discharge.

Tabulated 59

are the river

discharge

conditions under

high

and low

discharge

observed

during study period.

3.3

Daily

mean and maximum wind

speed

and direction data

along

the 67

survey

days.

3.4 Field surveys

(date ordered)

on the lower Merbok

Estuary.

69

3.5 River

discharge condition,

divide based on S values

during study

73

period.

3.6 Field surveys

(date ordered)

on the Prai coastal area. 78

4.1 TSS concentrations

during

various field surveys. 154 4.2 Details of surveys to the Muda coastal

region

and around

estuary

227

mouth

during study period.

4.3 Data measured

(date ordered)

on the Muda coastal

region

and 229

around

estuary

mouth

during study period.

4.4

Summary

of characteristics of

estuary plume during

field surveys on 232 the Muda coastal

region.

5.1 River

discharge; condition, density

and TSS values

during study

291

period.

5.2 The

RL

values for survey on 23 March 2003. 320

5.3 The

RL

values for survey on 19

May

2003. 320

5.4 The

RL

values for survey on 20

May

2003. 321

5.5 The

RL

values for survey on 7 June 2003. 321

5.6 Details of

meteorological

data to lower Merbok

Estuary during study

333

period.

5.7 Data measured

(date ordered)

on the lower Merbok

Estuary during

334

study period.

6.1 Details of surveys to Prai coastal area

(Penang Channel) during

377

study. period.

6.2 Data measured

(date ordered)

on the Prai coastal area

(Penang

378

Channel) during study period.

xiii

(14)

List of Figures

Page

1.1

(a)

A schematic

plan

view of an

estuary plume

in the coastal

water,

4 and

(b).

A vertical section of an

estuary plume

as the fresher water

discharge

from the

estuary

to coastal water.

2.1 Sketch of

buoyant layer

scales.

(a)

x and yare

alongshore

and 10

across-shore coordinates. Dashed line denotes a

bounding isopicnal

contour for the

buoyant layer.

U is

typical alongshore buoyant

water

velocity.

L and

yL

are the

alongshore

and the across-shore

length scale, respectively. (b)

A

typical

across-shore vertical section with vertical coordinate z. Dashed line shows

typical bounding isopicnal

for the

buoyant

of

typical depth

h.

(from Garvine, 1995).

2.2

Salinity

distributions

during

the

January

1997 flood.

Upper panels:

12

near-surface

(1.5m) salinity distributions:

lower

panel:

cross-sections at

estuary

mouth.

(from Geyer

et

al., 2000).

2.3 Total

suspended

sediment distributions

during

the 1997 flood.

Upper

13

panels:

near-surface

(1.5 m) suspended solids,

based on water

samples;

lower

panel:

cross-sections at river

mouth,

based on water

samples

and

optical

backscatterance sensor

(08S) profiles (from Geyer

et

ai., 2000).

2.4 Schematic

diagram illustrating estuary plume push by gravity

driven 16

flow

(from Wright

et

ai., 2001).

2.5

Conceptual diagram

of river

flow, according

to the

strength

of

outflow,

21

the

plume

may turn to left or

right (from James, 1997).

2.6 A schematic

diagram

of the structure of surface

density

in the Gulf of 23 Mexico at the mouth of the

Mississippi

River

during (a)

the flood tide

and

(b)

ebb tide

(from Da99

et

aI., 2001).

2.7 Structure of vertical

salinity

between 10 and 1m from surface in the 25 Rhine River.

(a)

Vertical

salinity

differences at location T = Ter

Heijde

(between

Rotterdam

Waterway

and

Scheveningen),

N =

Noorwijk,

and Y = IJmuiden. and

(b)

Vertical

salinity

with

predominantly

winds

from the east

7 m

S·1) (from

De

Ruijter

et

et., 1997).

2.8 Sea surface

salinity

SLFMR maps from

flights

at 3

day

intervals

(a)

- 30

(d). Strong

surface

salinity gradients

are

prominent

in all the maps

with freshwater

«16 psu)

in the channel and

along

the coasts. A transition zone of intermediate

salinity (30-34 psu)

marks the

plume boundary (from Burrage

et

aI., 2003).

3.1

Map

of the

study

areas, the square

(a). Muda, (b).

Merbok and

(c).

35

Prai estuaries and coastal zones.

3.2 Satellite SPOT

image

of the

study

areas.

(derived

from CRISP- 36

IKONOS on 31

January

2005 at 03:41:18 Local

Time)

3.3

Map

of the catchments area in Kedah and

Penang.

37

(15)

3.4

Geological

map of the

study

area in

Penang region (Source: Courtier,

41

1974).

3.5

Geological

map of the

study

area in Kedah

region (Source: Bean,

43

1969).

3.6 Southwest and Northeast monsoon

patterns

and wind directions. 47

3.7

Monthly

rainfalls for the

Penang region.

49

3.8

Monthly

rainfalls for the Kedah

region.

50

3.9 Wind Roses

Summary (1985-2002)

at station Butterworth for the 51

period

a.

April,

b.

May-September,

c.

October,

d. November-March.

3.10 Annual Wind Roses

Summary

for

cyclone

studied from 1985-2002 at 52 station Butterworth. The concentric circles in the dashes

represent

the various

percentage frequencies

oftime as labeled. The innermost full circle

represents

the

percentage

occurrence of calm

(wind speed

s 0.2

m/s),

the value of which is inscribe within the circle. Various

arms radiate from the innermost circle. The total

length

of each arm

represents

the total

percentage frequency

of time the wind blows from the direction concerned. Each arm is subdivided into a line and

rectangles

of different shades and sizes. These

represent

the various classes of

speed

as

given

in the

key

scale

(Source: MMS).

3.11 Location of the coastal area under

investigation.

The number and 56

circle

sign

shows the location of stations of field survey on 7

April

2002.

Bathymetry

of the coastal

region

is also shown in meters.

3.12

Monthly

mean and maximum river

discharge (m3/s) hydrographs

for 57

the Muda River between 1974 and 2002 at station Jambatan

Syed

Omar.

3.13

Monthly

mean river

discharge (m3/s) hydrographs

for the Muda River 58 between 2001 and 2002 at Jambatan

Syed

Omar

meteorological

station.

3.14 The total

monthly

rainfall

(mm) diagrams

for the Muda River between 58 2001 and 2002 at

Bumbung

Lima and

Pinang Tunggal meteorological

stations.

3.15

Diagram

of

daily

river

discharge (m3/s)

and river

stage (m)

at station 61

Jambatan

Syed

Omar

during

the months of survey.

3.16 Aerial

digital image

of

plume boundary intersecting

with oceanic 64

water,

Muda River mouth area,

captured

on 20

January

2002.

3.17 Observation maximum tidal

heights (m)

at Swettenham Pier for the 65 year 2001-2002.

3.18

(a) Map

of

study

area with details of the boundaries of the lower 70 Merbok

Estuary

and

(b)

location of the lower

estuary

area under

investigation.

The number and circle

sign

shows the location of

stations of field survey on 10

April 2003,

and the arrows indicates the transects direction.

3.19 Distribution of

monthly

mean rainfall at

Sungai

Petani

meteorological

71

station for 20 years

(1975-1995).

xv

(16)

3.20

Monthly

rainfall

histograms during

the

study

surveys

(2002-2003)

at 72

Sungai

Petani

meteorological

station.

3.21 The maximum tidal

heights

observation

(m)

at Station Swettenham 73 Pier for the year 2002-2003.

3.22

(a) Map

of

study

area with details of the boundaries of the Prai River 75 mouth and

Penang

Channel and

(b) bathymetry (m)

of the coastal

region

as the interestarea of surveys

study.

3.23 Aerial

image

of river

plume boundary intersecting

with oceanic

water,

76

Penang

Strait area,

captured

on 28 October 2001.

3.24 The total

monthly

rainfall

(mm) diagrams

for the Prai River between 79 2001 and 2003 at Butterworth

meteorological

stations.

3.25 The total

monthly

rainfall

(mm) diagrams

for the Prai River between 79 2001 and 2003 at Prai

meteorological

stations.

4.1 Horizontal distribution of surface

salinity (%0) during high

river 92

discharge

surveys on

(a)

8 November and

(b)

17 October 2001.

4.2 Horizontal distributions of

salinity (%0) during high

river

discharge

93

survey on 17 October at

(a)

1.5 m and

(b)

2.5 m

depth.

4.3 Horizontal distributions of

salinity (%0) during high

river

discharge

93

survey on 8 November at

(a)

1 m and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.4 Horizontal distributions of

salinity (%o) during

low river

discharge

94

surveys on

(a)

9 March 2002 and

(b)

4

July

2002.

4.5 Horizontal distributions of

salinity (%0) during

low river

discharge

95

survey on 17

January

2002 at

(a)

1 m and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.6 Horizontal distributions of

salinity (%0) during

low river

discharge

96

survey on 11 June 2002 at

(a)

1m and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.7 Vertical distributions of

salinity (%0) during high

river

discharge

at

(a)

97

transect 1

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(across shore)

survey on 8

November 2001.

4.8 Vertical distributions of

salinity (%0) during high

river

discharge

at 98

transect 1

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(across shore)

survey on 17

October

2001.

4.9 Vertical distributions of

salinity (%0) during

low river

discharge

at 99

transect 1

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(across shore)

survey on

17

January

2002.

4.10 Horizontal distribution of

temperature (oC) during high

river

discharge

101

surveys on

(a)

25

September

2001 and

(b)

7

May

2002.

4.11 Horizontal distributions of

temperature (oC) during high

river 102

discharge

survey on 25 October 2002 at

(a)

1m and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.12 Horizontal distributions of

temperature (oC) during high

river 102

discharge

survey on 7

May

2002 at

(a)

1m and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.13 Horizontal distribution of

temperature (oC) during

low river

discharge

104

surveys on

(a)

20

January

and

(b)

11 June 2002.

(17)

4.14 Horizontal distributions of

temperature (oC) during

low river

discharge

105 survey on 20

January

2002 in

(a)

1.5m and

(b)

3 m

depth.

4.15 Horizontal distributions of

temperature (oC) during

low river

discharge

105

survey on 11 June 2002 in

(a)

1m and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.16 Vertical distributions of

temperature (oC) during high

river

discharge

106

at

(a)

transect 1

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(across shore)

survey on 25

September

2001.

4.17 Vertical distributions of

temperature (oC) during high

river

discharge

107

at

(a)

transect 1

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(across shore)

survey on 8 November 2001.

4.18 Vertical distributions of

temperature (oC) during

low river

discharge

at 108

(a)

transect 1

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(across shore)

survey

on 20

January

2002.

4.19 Vertical distributions of

temperature (oC) during

low river

discharge

at 109

(a)

transect 1

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(across shore)

survey

on 11 June 2002.

4.20 Horizontal distribution of

density (kgm3) during high

river

discharge

111

surveys on

(a)

28

July

2001 and

(b)

8 November 2001.

4.21 Horizontal distributions of

density (kgm·3) during high

river

discharge

112

survey on 28

July

2001 at

(a)

1.5 m and

(b)

2.5 m

depth.

4.22 Horizontal distributions of

density (kgm-3) during high

river

discharge

112

survey on 8 November 2001 at

(a)

1m and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.23 Horizontal distribution of

density (kgm·3) during

low river

discharge

113 surveys on

(a)

6

February

and

(b)

6 June 2002.

4.24 Horizontal distributions of

density (kgm·3) during

low river

discharge

114

survey

on 6

February

2002 in

(a)

1 m and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.25 Horizontal distributions of

density (kgm·3) during

low river

discharge

115

survey on 6 June 2002 in

(a)

2 m and

(b)

3 m

depth.

4.26 Vertical distributions of

density (kgm'3) during high

river

discharge

at 116

(a)

transect 1

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(cross shore)

survey

on 28

July

2001.

4.27 Vertical distributions of

density (kgm·3) during

low river

discharge

at 118

(a)

transect 1

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(cross shore)

survey

on 6 June 2002.

4.28 Horizontal distribution of TSS

(rnql") during high

river

discharge

119

surveys on

(a)

8 November 2001 and

(b)

28

April

2002.

4.29 Horizontal distribution of TSS

(rnql") during

low river

discharge

120

surveys on

(a)

12

January

and

(b)

11 June 2002.

4.30

Monthly

mean

suspended

sediment

(tones/month) hydrographs

for 121

the Muda River between 1976 and 2002

(26 years)

at Jambatan

Syed

Omar station

(Source: DID).

4.31 Muda River

discharge (rrr's")

versus

suspended

sediment loads 122

(tones

per

day)

between 1976 and 2002

(Source: DID).

xvii

(18)

4.32

Monthly

mean

suspended

sediment

(tones/month) hydrographs

for 123

the Muda River

during

the month of surveys between 2001 and 2002 at Jambatan

Syed

Omar station.

4.33

Diagram

of

daily

river

discharge (m3/s)

and

suspended

sediment 124

(tones/day)

at station Jambatan

Syed

Omar

during

the months of

survey.

4.34 Muda River

discharge (m3s·1)

versus

suspended

sediment load

(ton

128

per

day)

for the year of 2001.

4.35 Muda River

discharge (rrr's')

versus

suspended

sediment load

(ton

128

per

day)

for the year of 2002.

4.36 Horizontal distribution of

salinity (%o)

in

spring

tide condition for flood 130

tide,

survey on 17 October

2001,

and

(b)

ebb to flood tide survey on

12

August

2002.

4.37 Horizontal distribution of

salinity (%0)

in

spring

tide condition survey 132

on 17 October 2001 at

(a)

1.5 and

(b)

2.5 m

depth.

4.38 Horizontal distribution of

salinity (%0)

in

spring

tide condition survey 132

on 12

August

2001 at

(a)

1 and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.39 Horizontal distribution of

salinity (%0)

in neap tide condition for ebb 133

tide, surveyed

on 25 October 2001 and

(b)

flood tide survey on 7

Apri12002.

4.40 Horizontal distribution of

salinity (%0)

in neap tide condition survey on 134 25 October 2001 at

(a)

1 and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.41 Horizontal distribution of

salinity (%0)

in neap tide condition survey on 135 7

April

2002 at

(a)

1.5 and

(b)

2.5 m

depth.

4.42 Vertical distributions of

salinity (%0) during spring

tide at transect 1 136

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(across shore)

survey on 17 October 2001.

4.43 Vertical distributions of

salinity (%o) during

neap tide at transect 1 137

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(across shore)

survey on 25 October

2001.

4.44 Horizontal distribution of

temperature (oC)

in

spring

tide condition for 138

(a)

flood

tide,

survey on 13

February

2002 and

(b)

ebb to flood tide

survey on 12

August

2002.

4.45 Horizontal distribution of

temperature (oC)

in

spring

tide condition 139 survey on 13

February

2002 at

(a)

1 and

(b)

1.5 m

depth.

4.46 Horizontal distribution of

temperature (oC)

in

spring

tide condition 140 survey on 12

August

2001 at

(a)

1 and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.47 Horizontal distribution of

temperature (oC)

in neap tide condition for 141

(a)

ebb

tide, surveyed

on 25

September

2001 and

(b)

flood tide

surveyed

on 7

April

2002.

4.48 Horizontal distribution of

temperature (oC)

in neap tide condition 142 survey on 25

September

2001 at

(a)

1 and

(b)

2 m

depth.

(19)

4.49 Horizontal distribution of

temperature (oC)

in neap tide condition 143

survey on 7

April

2002 at

(a)

1.5 and

(b)

2.5 m

depth.

4.50 Vertical distributions of

temperature (oC) during spring

tide at transect 144 1

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(across shore)

survey on 13

February

2002.

4.51 Vertical distributions of

temperature (oC) during

neap tide at transect 145 1

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(across shore)

survey on 25

September

2001.

4.52 Horizontal distribution of

density (kgm-3)

in

spring

tide condition for 146 survey on

(a)

17 October 2001 and

(b)

11 June 2002.

4.53 Horizontal distribution of

density (kgm-3)

in

spring

tide condition 147

survey on 17 October 2001 at

(a)

1.5 and

(b)

2.5 m

depth.

4.54 Horizontal distribution of

density (kgm-3)

in

spring

tide condition 147

survey on 11 June 2002 at

(a)

1 and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.55 Horizontal distribution of

density' (kgm-3)

in neap tide condition for

(a)

148

flood

tide,

survey on 6 June 2002 and

(b)

ebb tide survey on 28

July

2001.

4.56 Horizontal distribution of

density (kgm-3)

in neap tide condition survey 150

on 6

February

2002 at

(a)

1 and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.57 Horizontal distribution of

density (kgm-3)

in neap tide condition survey 150

on 28

July

2001 at

(a)

1.5 and

(b)

2.5 m

depth

4.58 Vertical distributions of

density (kgm-3) during spring

tide at transect 1 151

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(across shore)

survey on 17 October 2001.

4.59 Vertical distributions of

density (kgm-3) during

neap tide at transect 1 153

(along shore)

and

(b)

transect 2

(across shore)

survey on 7

April

2002.

4.60 Horizontal distribution of TSS

(rnql") during spring

tide at flood

tide,

155

surveyed

on 12

January

2002 and

(b)

ebb to flood tide survey on 28

Apri12002.

4.61 Horizontal distribution of TSS

(rnql") during

neap tide at

(a)

ebb to 156

flood

tide, surveyed

on 17

January

2002 and

(b)

flood to ebb tide

survey on 4

July

2002.

4.62 Horizontal distribution of

(a) salinity (%0) during strong

wind surveys 157

on

(a)

28

July

2001 and

(b)

12

January

2002.

4.63 Horizontal distribution of

(a) salinity (%0) during

weak wind surveys on 158

(a)

17 October 2001 and

(b)

12

August

2002.

4.64 Horizontal distribution of

temperature (oe) during strong

wind surveys 159

on

(a)

25 October 2001 and

(b)

28 March 2002.

4.65 Horizontal distribution of

temperature (oC) during

weak wind surveys 159

on

(a)

17

January

2002 and

(b)

4

July

2002.

xix

(20)

4.66 Horizontal distribution of

density (kgm-3) during strong

wind surveys 160

on

(a)

13

February

2002 and

(b)

7

April

2002.

4.67 Horizontal distribution of

density (kgrn-3) during

weakwind surveys on 161

(a)

8 November 2001 and

(b)

12

August

2002.

4.68 Horizontal distribution of TSS

(rnql") during strong

wind surveys on 162

(a)

25

September

2001 and

(b)

28 March 2002.

4.69 Horizontal distribution of TSS

(mql") during

weak wind surveys on

(a)

163

17 October 2001 and

(b)

6 June 2002.

4.70 Tide

prediction (m)

data

during

the

day

of survey on 11

September

164

2004

4.71 Water level observations

(m)

on 11

September

2004

(spring tide).

164

4.72 Tide

prediction (m)

data

during

the

day

of survey on 25

September

165

2004.

4.73 Water level observations

(m)

on 25

September

2004

(neap tide).

165

4.74 Measured current

magnitude (m/s)

on 11

September

2004. 166

4.75 Measured current direction

(deg).

on 11

September

2004. 166

4.76 Measured current

magnitude (m/s)

on 25

September

2004. 167

4.77 Measured current direction

(deg)

on 25

September

2004. 167

4.78 Distribution of

(a)

the survey stations and

(b)

current

magnitude

170

(ern/s)

and direction

(deg)

at 0.5 m

depth,

survey on 12

August

2005.

4.79 Distribution of the current

magnitude (ern/s)

and direction

(deg),

170

survey on 12

August

2005 at

(a)

1 m and

(b)

2 m

depth.

4.80 Distribution of current

magnitude (em/s)

and direction

(deg)

at 3m 171

depth,

survey on 12

August

2005.

4.81 Distributions of

temperature

at

(a)

1 m and

(b)

2 m

depth

survey on 172 12

August

2005.

4.82 Distributions of

salinity

at

(a)

1 m and

(b)

2 m

depth

survey on 12 173

August

2005.

4.83 Distributions of

density

at

(a)

1 m and

(b)

2 m

depth

survey on 12 173

August

2005.

4.84 Vertical distribution of

temperature (oe)

at

along

shore transect 174

survey

on 12

August

2005.

4.85 Vertical distribution of

salinity (%0)

at

along

shore transect survey on 175 12

August

2005.

4.86 Vertical distribution of

density (kgm-3)

at

along

shore transect survey 175

on 12

August

2005.

4.87

Salinity-density diagrams along

the date of surveys. 187

(21)

4.88 Schematic

diagrams

in 3D model of the

salinity

distribution in the 195 Muda coastal water for

(a) spring

tide is characterized

by stronger

energy

(bigger arrow),

isohaline is closer to the coastline and the

homogenous pattern

and

(b)

neap tide is characterized

by

weaker

energy

(smaller arrow),

isohaline is further to coastline and stratified

pattern.

4.89 Horizontal distribution of

(a) salinity (%0)

and

(b) temperature (oC)

211

survey on 8 November 2001.

4.90 Horizontal distribution of

(a) salinity (%o)

and

(b) temperature (oC)

211

survey on 7

May

2002.

4.91 Horizontal distribution of

(a) salinity (%0)

and

(b) temperature (oC)

212

survey on 12

January

2002.

4.92 Horizontal distribution of

(a) salinity (%0)

and

(b) temperature (oC)

213

survey on 6 June 2002.

4.93 Horizontal distribution of

temperature (oC)

survey on

(a).

17 October 215

2001 and

(b).

28 March 2002.

4.94 An aerial

digital image

over the Muda coastal water,

showing

the 218

distinct

edge

of

estuary plume, captured

on 28

July

2001. The

plume pattern

was identified

by

field observation

(TSS) during

similar date

(insert Figure).

4.95

Sequence

of aerial

digital images

over the Muda coastal water, 220

showing

the distinct

edge

of

estuary plume, captured

on 20

January

2002. The

plume pattern

was identified

by

field observation

(TSS) during

similar date

(insert Figure).

4.96

Sequence

of aerial

digital images

over the Muda coastal

water,

223

showing

the distinct

edge

of

estuary plume, captured

on 9 March

2002. The

plume pattern

was identified

by

field observation

(TSS) during

similar date

(insert Figure).

4.97

Sequence

of aerial

digital images

over the Muda coastal

water,

225

showing

the distinct

edge

of

estuary plume, captured

on 1

September

2003.

5.1 Surface horizontal distributions of

salinity (%0) during (a) high

river 236

discharge,

on 26 October

2002,

and

(b)

low river

discharge,

on 23

March 2003.

5.2 Vertical distributions of

salinity (%0) during high

river

discharge,

on 20 238

May

2003 at

(a)

transect

1, along estuary

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary.

5.3 Vertical distributions of

salinity (%0) during

low river

discharge

on 17 239

June 2003 at

(a)

transect

1, along estuary

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary.

5.4 Surface horizontal distributions of

temperature (oC) during (a) high

241

river

discharge,

on 26 October 2002 and

(b)

low river

discharge,

on

23 March 2003.

xxi

(22)

5.5 Vertical distributions of

temperature (oC) during high

river

discharge

242

on 19

May

2003 at

(a)

transect

1, along estuary

and

(b)

transect 2,

across

estuary.

5.6 Vertical distributions of

temperature (oC) during

low river

discharge

243

on 7 June 2003 at

(a)

transect

i, along estuary

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary.

5.7

Diagram

of maximum

temperature (oC)

at station

Penang Airport

244

during

the months of survey in

(a) May

and

(b)

June 2003.

5.8 Surface horizontal distributions of

density (kgm·3) during (a) high

river 246

discharge,

survey on 26 October 2002 and

(b)

low river

discharge,

survey on 22 March 2003.

5.9 Vertical distributions of

density (kgm·3) during high

river

discharge

at 247

(a)

transect

t, along estuary

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary,

survey on 20

May

2003.

5.10 Vertical distributions of

density (kgm·3) during

low river

discharge

at 248

(a)

transect

t, along estuary

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary,

survey on 7 June 2003.

5.11 Surface horizontal distribution of TSS

(rnql") during (a) high

river 250

discharge,

survey on 26 October 2002 and

(b)

low river

discharge,

survey on 07 June 2003.

5.12 Surface horizontal distributions of Secchi

depth (em) during (a) high

252

river

discharge,

survey on 26 October 2002 and

(b)

low river

discharge,

survey on 22 March 2003.

5.13 Surface horizontal

distributions'

of

salinity (%0) during spring tide,

253

survey on 17 June 2003 and

(b)

neap

tide,

survey on 7 June 2003.

5.14 Vertical

distributions;

of

salinity (%0) during spring

tide at

(a)

transect 255

t, along estuary

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary,

survey on 23

March 2003,

5.15 Vertical distributions of

salinity (%0) during

neap tide at

(a)

transect

1,

256

along estuary

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary,

survey on 7 June

2003.

5.16 Surface horizontal distribution of

temperature (oC) during spring tide,

258

survey on 17 June 2003 and

(b)

neap

tide,

survey on 7 June 2003.

5.17 Vertical distributions of

temperature (oC) during spring

tide at

(a)

259

transect

t. along estuary

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary,

survey

on 17 June 2003.

5.18 Vertical distributions of

temperature (oC) during

neap tide at

(a)

260

transect

1, along estuary

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary,

survey

on 7 June 2003.

'

5.19 Surface horizontal distributions of

density (kgm·3) during spring tide,

262 survey on 17 June 2003 and

(b)

neap

tide,

survey on 7 June 2003.

5,20 Vertical distributions of

density (kqrn") during spring

tide at

(a)

263

transect

t, along estuary

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary,

survey

on 17 June 2003.

(23)

5.21 Vertical distributions of

density (kgm-3) during

neap tide at

(a)

transect 265

1, along estuary

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary,

survey on 7 June

2003

5.22 Surface horizontal distributions of TSS

(rnql") during spring tide,

266

survey on 22 March 2003 and

(b)

neap

tide,

survey on 7 June 2003.

5.23 Surface horizontal distributions of Secchi

depth (ern) during spring

268

tide,

survey on 22 March 2003 and

(b)

neap

tide,

survey on 7 June

2003.

5.24 Surface horizontal distribution of

salinity (%0) during strong wind,

269

survey on 17 June 2003 and

(b)

weak

wind,

survey on 23 March 2003.

5.25 Surface horizontal

distributions'

of

temperature (oe) during strong

270

wind,

survey on 22 March 2003 and

(b)

weak

wind,

survey on 26

October 2002.

5.26 Surface horizontal distributions of

density (kgm-3) during strong wind,

271 survey on 22 March 2003 and

(b)

weak

wind,

survey on 23 March

2003.

5.27 Surface horizontal distributions of TSS

(mgr1) during strong wind,

272 survey on 7 June 2003 and

(b)

weak

wind,

survey on 26 October

2002.

5.28 Surface horizontal distributions of Secchi

depth (cm) during strong

273

wind,

survey on 22 March 2003 and

(b)

weak

wind,

survey on 23

March 2003.

5.29 Distribution of

(a)

the survey stations and

(b)

current

magnitude

275

(cm/s)

and direction

(deg)

at 0.5 m

depth,

survey on 12

August

2005.

5.30 Distribution of the current

magnitude (cm/s)

and

direction (deg),

276

survey on 12

August

2005 at

(a)

1 m and

(b)

2 m

depth.

5.31 Distributions of

temperature

at

(a)

1 m and

(b)

2 m

depth

survey on 277

12

August

2005.

5.32 Distributions of

salinity

at

(a)

1 m and

(b)

2 m

depth

survey on 12 278

Aug

ust 2005.

5.33 Distributions of

density

at

(a)

1 m and

(b)

2 m

depth

survey on 12 278

August

2005.

5.34 Vertical distribution of current

magnitude (cm/s)

at

(a)

transect

1,

279

along estuary

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuarysurvey

on 12

August

2005.

5.35 Vertical distribution of

temperature (oe)

at

(a)

transect

1, along

280

estuary

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary

survey on 12

August

2005.

5.36 Vertical distribution of

salinity (%0)

at

(a)

transect

1, along estuary

and 281

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary

survey on 12

August

2005.

5.37 Vertical distribution of

density (kgm-3)

at

(a)

transect

1, along estuary

282

and

(b)

transect

2,

across

estuary

survey on 12

August

2005.

xxiii

Figure

Updating...

References

Related subjects :