THE INFLUENCE OF RIVER DISCHARGES, TIDES, AND
WINDS ON ESTUARINE PLUME IN NORTHWEST
PENINSULAR MALAYSIA
by
MUHAMMAD SYUKRI
Thesis submitted in fulfillment of the
requirements
for thedegree
of Doctor of
Philosophy
December 2006
<To 'Very
special: peopfe
inmylife:
my
(ate mother (/)juairiali Sa6�
my
wife (]Uni Safitri
anti
my
sonCJ{fLuslian a{ 7(p.syjie
!illuhammad
The origins of oceanography lie in voyaging
...ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
As a
long journey
and endeavour, this thesis was not a solo effort. lowe atremendous of
gratitude
to the manypeople
that assist andsupport
me, that it isdifficult to know where to
begin
and end this list. Even after one of thelongest acknowledgments
list ever written in this thesis isdone,
I am sure I will haveforgotten
some
important people.
To you J offer myapologies
andimplicit
thanks. I would like to thank theUniversity
ofSyiah
Kuala(USK), Darussalam,
BandaAceh,
Indonesia forproviding
thescholarship
tosupport
mystudy.
I also wish to thankUniversity
ScienceMalaysia (USM),
forserving
and the use of allfacility,
where I learnt so much frombeing part
ofagraduate
student here.The very
first,
I want to payspecial
tribute to my advisor and friend Dr. Md. Noordin Abu Bakar has served as a source ofinspiration
since theconception
of thisthesis, helped
me withadvice,
comments andsuggestions.
He wasalways
available when I needed his advice orwisdom,
but gave me the freedom to workindependently.
Hehas demonstrated
impeccable leadership
and hasgiven
me astrong
foundation on which to build my ownindependent
research program.Insya Allah,
my career as anoceanographer
in the future willalways
reflect what I have learned as a student from him. Further more, I also would like to thank to Ass. Prof. Dr. Khiruddin Abdullah as aco-supervisor
forreviewing
some of the results. Then I would like to extent my thanksto Dr. Zuhar Zahir Tuan Harith for
guiding, suggestions
and useful discussionduring
my
study.
111
I would like to thanks the
Malaysia Meteorological
Service(MMS)
forkindly providing
the
meteorology
andhydrographic data,
theHydrology
and Water ResourcesDivision,
Department
ofIrrigation
andDrainage (DID) Malaysia
forgraciously providing
thesuspended
sedimentconcentration,
riverdischarge,
and riverstage data,
theMalaysian Mapping
andSurvey Department (MMSD)
forpleasantly providing
the tide observationdata, Centre
for Marine and Coastal Studies(CEMAC)
USM for their
friendship
and all those whohelped
me withlaboratory
work for the TSSanalysis,
KedahFlying
Club(KFC)
forsupplied
aerialimages
from aerial surveys with their small aircraft. These datasets contributedsignificantly
to thequality
of thework and
study presented
in these pages.I want to thank the Dean School of
Physics USM,
all staff ofGeophysics Laboratory,
School of
Physics,
forproviding
anatmosphere teeming
with a collaborativespirit
andenthusiasm for the research.
Special
thanks also to my wonderful friends and team works En. YaakubOthman,
En.Jamalludin,
Uncle AbuBakar,
for their technicaladvice,
whohelped
me with field surveys of thedays
andnights
and in all weathers.They
were also enthusiastic about myproject
and made thedays
Ispent
fieldsurveying enjoyable.
En. ZainulAbidin,
ShahilAhmad,
ShaifulMahathir,
andFaisal,
avery
special
thank you for all yourhelp, cooperation,
assistance andencouragement.
Further,
I would like to express myspecial
thanks to myparents,
Usman Ismail and(late) Djuairiah Sabi,
and myparents-in-law,
Soewardi Soekirman and Nur AiniUmar,
my sisters andbrothers,
k'ina andb'Samsoel,
k'Nyanyak
andb'PoeJ,
k'ida andb'ljal,
and Ismail for their
supporting
and do'aduring
this verychallenging period
in my life.Finally, especially
and mostimportantly,
to my wife and best friend RiniSafitri,
and my son and sources ofinspiration
Raushan alKasyfie Muhammad,
for their wonderfulsupport, love, patience, distraction,
and comfortduring
thistrying odyssey
know asgraduate school,
andparticularly during
that rather surrealperiod
know as"writing up".
I could not have done this withoutthem,
and dedicate my thesis to them.v
Contents
Page
Acknowledgements
iiiContents vi
List of Tables xiii
List of
Figures
xivList of Abbreviations xxvi
List of
Symbols
xxviiiList of
Appendices
xxxAbstrak xxxi
Abstract xxxiii
1
Chapter
One: Introduction1.0 Introduction 1
1.1 Motivation 2
1.2
Hypothesis
41.3
Objectives
and scope 61.4 Thesis Outline 7
Chapter
Two: Literature Review 92.0
Estuary plume
structures 92.1 Sediment
transport
142.2 Factors
affecting estuary plumes
192.2.1 River
discharges
192.2.2 Tides 20
2.2.3 Winds and waves 22
2.3 Currents in coastal waters and estuaries 25
2.4 Remote
sensing technology
indetecting estuary plume
272.4.1 Innovative
mapping
andmodeling
272.4.2 Other remote
sensing applications
32Chapter
Three:Methodology
343.0 Definition of the
study
areas 343.1 Site
description
and catchment area 363.2
Geological setting
393.3
Meteorological
andhydrographic data
433.3.1 Climate data 45
a.
Temperature
46b. Relative
humidity
48c. Rainfall 48
3.3.2 Wind data 49
3.3.3 Tidal data 52
3.4 Field surveys 53
3.4.1 Muda surveys 54
3.4.2 Merbok surveys 68
3.4.3 Prai surveys 74
3.5
Laboratory
work 813.6 Data
processing
andanalysis
813.6.1
Mapping
andcontouring
data 813.6.2
Density
823.6.3 Water masses 87
3.6.4 Water
mixing
883.6.5 Validation of total
suspended
solids 89Chapter
Four:Muda Surveys
904.0 Introduction 90
4.1 River
discharge
influence 914.1.1
Salinity
91a. Horizontal distribution 91
b. Vertical distribution 95
VII
4.1.2
Temperature
100a. Horizontal distribution 100
b. Vertical distribution 106
4.1.3
Density
110a. Horizontal distribution 110
b. Vertical distribution 115
4.1.4 Total
suspended
solids 1184.1.5
Suspended
sediment load in the river 1214.2 Tidal influence 128
4.2.1
Salinity
129a. Horizontal distribution 129
b. Vertical distribution 135
4.2.2
Temperature
138a. Horizontal distribution 138
b. Vertical distribution 143
4.2.3
Density
145a. Horizontal distribution 145
b. Vertical distribution 151
4.2.4 Total
suspended
solids 1534.3 :Wind influence 156
4.3.1
Salinity
1564.3.2
Temperature
1584.3.3
Density
1604.3.4 Total
suspended
solids 1614.4 Current characteristics 163
4.4.1 In the
estuary
1634.4.2 At the coastal zone 168
4.5 Discussion 176
4.5.1 River
discharge
influence 176a.
Salinity pattern
176b.
Temperature pattern
181c.
Density pattern
183d. Total
suspended
solidspattern
1864.5.2 Tidal influence 191
a.
Salinity pattern
191b.
Temperature pattern
196c.
Density pattern
199d. Total
suspended
solidspattern
2034.5.3 Wind influence 205
a.
Salinity pattern
206b.
Temperature pattern
207c.
Density pattern
208d. Total
suspended
solidspattern
2094.5.4 Monsoon
variability
andatmospheric temperature
2104.5.5 Water masses 215
4.5.6 Aerial surveys 217
4.6
Summary
of field surveys 226Chapter
Five: MerbokSurveys
2345.0 I ntrod uction 234
5.1 River
discharge
influence 2355.1.1
Salinity
235a. Horizontal distribution 235
b. Vertical distribution 237
5.1.2
Temperature
240a. Horizontal distribution 240
b. Vertical distribution 242
5.1.3
Density
245a. Horizontal distribution 245
b. Vertical distribution 246
5.1.4 Total
suspended
solids 2495.1.5 Secchi
depth
2515.2 Tidal influence 253
5.2.1
Salinity
253a. Horizontal distribution 253
.ix
b. Vertical distribution 254
5.2.2
Temperature
257a. Horizontal distribution 257
b. Vertical distribution 259
5.2.3
Density
261a. Horizontal distribution 261
b. Vertical distribution 263
5.2.4 Total
suspended
solids 2655.2.5 Secchi
depth
2675.3 Wind influence 268
5.3.1
Salinity
2685.3.2
Temperature
2705.3.3
Density
2715.3.4 Total
suspended
solids 2725.3.5 Secchi
depth
2735.4 Current characteristics 274
5.5 Discussion 283
5.5.1 River
discharge
influence 283a.
Salinity pattern
283b.
Temperature pattern
285c.
Density pattern
287d. Total
suspended
solidspattern
290e. Secchi
depth pattern
2925.5.2 Tidal influence 294
a.
Salinity pattern
296b.
Temperature pattern
300c.
Density pattern
301d. Total
suspended
solidspattern
303e. Secchi
depth pattern
3055.5.3 Wind influence 307
a.
Salinity pattern
307b.
Temperature pattern
308c.
Density pattern
309d. Total
suspended
solidpattern
310e. Secchi
depth pattern
3115.5.4 Monsoon
variability
andatmospheric temperature
3125.5.5 Water masses 317
5.5.6
Mixing
Processes 3195.5.7 Aerial surveys 324
5.6
Summary
of field surveys 332Chapter
Six: PraiSurveys
3356.0 Introduction 335
6.1 River
discharge
influence 3366.1.1
Salinity
3366.1.2
Temperature
3386.1.3
Density
3396.1.4 Total
suspended
solids 3406.2 Tidal influence 341
6.2.1
Salinity
3416.2.2
Temperature
3426.2.3
Density
3436.2.4 Total
suspended
solids 3456.3 Wind influence 346
6.3.1
Salinity
3466.3.2
Temperature
3476.3.3
Density
3486.3.4 Total
suspended
solids 3496.4 Discussion 351
6.4.1 River
discharge
influence 351a.
Salinity pattern
351b.
Temperature pattern
353c.
Density pattern
354d. Total
suspended
solidspattern
3556.4.2 Tidal influence 357
xi
a.
Salinity pattern
357b.
Temperature pattern
358c.
Density pattern
359d. Total
suspended
solidspattern
3606.4.3 Wind influence 362
a.
Salinity pattern
362b.
Temperature pattern
363c.
Density pattern
363d. Total
suspended
solidspattern
3646.4.4Aerial surveys 365
6.5
Summary
of field surveys 376Chapter
Seven: Conclusions and Future Works 3797.0 Conclusions
7.1 Recommendations and future work
requirements
379 383
References
List of Publications
385 398
Appendices
Appendix
A : All results of Muda surveysAppendix
B : All results of Merbok surveysAppendix
C : All results of Prai surveysCD CD CD CD
List of Tables
Page
2.1
Discharge
data for the world'slargest
rivers. 153.1 Field surveys
(date ordered)
on the Muda coastal area. 55 3.2Summary
of cumulative 5days
rainfall and riverdischarge.
Tabulated 59are the river
discharge
conditions underhigh
and lowdischarge
observed
during study period.
3.3
Daily
mean and maximum windspeed
and direction dataalong
the 67survey
days.
3.4 Field surveys
(date ordered)
on the lower MerbokEstuary.
693.5 River
discharge condition,
divide based on S valuesduring study
73period.
3.6 Field surveys
(date ordered)
on the Prai coastal area. 784.1 TSS concentrations
during
various field surveys. 154 4.2 Details of surveys to the Muda coastalregion
and aroundestuary
227mouth
during study period.
4.3 Data measured
(date ordered)
on the Muda coastalregion
and 229around
estuary
mouthduring study period.
4.4
Summary
of characteristics ofestuary plume during
field surveys on 232 the Muda coastalregion.
5.1 River
discharge; condition, density
and TSS valuesduring study
291period.
5.2 The
RL
values for survey on 23 March 2003. 3205.3 The
RL
values for survey on 19May
2003. 3205.4 The
RL
values for survey on 20May
2003. 3215.5 The
RL
values for survey on 7 June 2003. 3215.6 Details of
meteorological
data to lower MerbokEstuary during study
333period.
5.7 Data measured
(date ordered)
on the lower MerbokEstuary during
334study period.
6.1 Details of surveys to Prai coastal area
(Penang Channel) during
377study. period.
6.2 Data measured
(date ordered)
on the Prai coastal area(Penang
378Channel) during study period.
xiii
List of Figures
Page
1.1
(a)
A schematicplan
view of anestuary plume
in the coastalwater,
4 and(b).
A vertical section of anestuary plume
as the fresher waterdischarge
from theestuary
to coastal water.2.1 Sketch of
buoyant layer
scales.(a)
x and yarealongshore
and 10across-shore coordinates. Dashed line denotes a
bounding isopicnal
contour for the
buoyant layer.
U istypical alongshore buoyant
watervelocity.
L andyL
are thealongshore
and the across-shorelength scale, respectively. (b)
Atypical
across-shore vertical section with vertical coordinate z. Dashed line showstypical bounding isopicnal
for the
buoyant
oftypical depth
h.(from Garvine, 1995).
2.2
Salinity
distributionsduring
theJanuary
1997 flood.Upper panels:
12near-surface
(1.5m) salinity distributions:
lowerpanel:
cross-sections atestuary
mouth.(from Geyer
etal., 2000).
2.3 Total
suspended
sediment distributionsduring
the 1997 flood.Upper
13panels:
near-surface(1.5 m) suspended solids,
based on watersamples;
lowerpanel:
cross-sections at rivermouth,
based on watersamples
andoptical
backscatterance sensor(08S) profiles (from Geyer
etai., 2000).
2.4 Schematic
diagram illustrating estuary plume push by gravity
driven 16flow
(from Wright
etai., 2001).
2.5
Conceptual diagram
of riverflow, according
to thestrength
ofoutflow,
21the
plume
may turn to left orright (from James, 1997).
2.6 A schematic
diagram
of the structure of surfacedensity
in the Gulf of 23 Mexico at the mouth of theMississippi
Riverduring (a)
the flood tideand
(b)
ebb tide(from Da99
etaI., 2001).
2.7 Structure of vertical
salinity
between 10 and 1m from surface in the 25 Rhine River.(a)
Verticalsalinity
differences at location T = TerHeijde
(between
RotterdamWaterway
andScheveningen),
N =Noorwijk,
and Y = IJmuiden. and
(b)
Verticalsalinity
withpredominantly
windsfrom the east
(±
7 mS·1) (from
DeRuijter
etet., 1997).
2.8 Sea surface
salinity
SLFMR maps fromflights
at 3day
intervals(a)
- 30(d). Strong
surfacesalinity gradients
areprominent
in all the mapswith freshwater
«16 psu)
in the channel andalong
the coasts. A transition zone of intermediatesalinity (30-34 psu)
marks theplume boundary (from Burrage
etaI., 2003).
3.1
Map
of thestudy
areas, the square(a). Muda, (b).
Merbok and(c).
35Prai estuaries and coastal zones.
3.2 Satellite SPOT
image
of thestudy
areas.(derived
from CRISP- 36IKONOS on 31
January
2005 at 03:41:18 LocalTime)
3.3
Map
of the catchments area in Kedah andPenang.
373.4
Geological
map of thestudy
area inPenang region (Source: Courtier,
411974).
3.5
Geological
map of thestudy
area in Kedahregion (Source: Bean,
431969).
3.6 Southwest and Northeast monsoon
patterns
and wind directions. 473.7
Monthly
rainfalls for thePenang region.
493.8
Monthly
rainfalls for the Kedahregion.
503.9 Wind Roses
Summary (1985-2002)
at station Butterworth for the 51period
a.April,
b.May-September,
c.October,
d. November-March.3.10 Annual Wind Roses
Summary
forcyclone
studied from 1985-2002 at 52 station Butterworth. The concentric circles in the dashesrepresent
the various
percentage frequencies
oftime as labeled. The innermost full circlerepresents
thepercentage
occurrence of calm(wind speed
s 0.2
m/s),
the value of which is inscribe within the circle. Variousarms radiate from the innermost circle. The total
length
of each armrepresents
the totalpercentage frequency
of time the wind blows from the direction concerned. Each arm is subdivided into a line andrectangles
of different shades and sizes. Theserepresent
the various classes ofspeed
asgiven
in thekey
scale(Source: MMS).
3.11 Location of the coastal area under
investigation.
The number and 56circle
sign
shows the location of stations of field survey on 7April
2002.
Bathymetry
of the coastalregion
is also shown in meters.3.12
Monthly
mean and maximum riverdischarge (m3/s) hydrographs
for 57the Muda River between 1974 and 2002 at station Jambatan
Syed
Omar.
3.13
Monthly
mean riverdischarge (m3/s) hydrographs
for the Muda River 58 between 2001 and 2002 at JambatanSyed
Omarmeteorological
station.
3.14 The total
monthly
rainfall(mm) diagrams
for the Muda River between 58 2001 and 2002 atBumbung
Lima andPinang Tunggal meteorological
stations.
3.15
Diagram
ofdaily
riverdischarge (m3/s)
and riverstage (m)
at station 61Jambatan
Syed
Omarduring
the months of survey.3.16 Aerial
digital image
ofplume boundary intersecting
with oceanic 64water,
Muda River mouth area,captured
on 20January
2002.3.17 Observation maximum tidal
heights (m)
at Swettenham Pier for the 65 year 2001-2002.3.18
(a) Map
ofstudy
area with details of the boundaries of the lower 70 MerbokEstuary
and(b)
location of the lowerestuary
area underinvestigation.
The number and circlesign
shows the location ofstations of field survey on 10
April 2003,
and the arrows indicates the transects direction.3.19 Distribution of
monthly
mean rainfall atSungai
Petanimeteorological
71station for 20 years
(1975-1995).
xv
3.20
Monthly
rainfallhistograms during
thestudy
surveys(2002-2003)
at 72Sungai
Petanimeteorological
station.3.21 The maximum tidal
heights
observation(m)
at Station Swettenham 73 Pier for the year 2002-2003.3.22
(a) Map
ofstudy
area with details of the boundaries of the Prai River 75 mouth andPenang
Channel and(b) bathymetry (m)
of the coastalregion
as the interestarea of surveysstudy.
3.23 Aerial
image
of riverplume boundary intersecting
with oceanicwater,
76Penang
Strait area,captured
on 28 October 2001.3.24 The total
monthly
rainfall(mm) diagrams
for the Prai River between 79 2001 and 2003 at Butterworthmeteorological
stations.3.25 The total
monthly
rainfall(mm) diagrams
for the Prai River between 79 2001 and 2003 at Praimeteorological
stations.4.1 Horizontal distribution of surface
salinity (%0) during high
river 92discharge
surveys on(a)
8 November and(b)
17 October 2001.4.2 Horizontal distributions of
salinity (%0) during high
riverdischarge
93survey on 17 October at
(a)
1.5 m and(b)
2.5 mdepth.
4.3 Horizontal distributions of
salinity (%0) during high
riverdischarge
93survey on 8 November at
(a)
1 m and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.4 Horizontal distributions of
salinity (%o) during
low riverdischarge
94surveys on
(a)
9 March 2002 and(b)
4July
2002.4.5 Horizontal distributions of
salinity (%0) during
low riverdischarge
95survey on 17
January
2002 at(a)
1 m and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.6 Horizontal distributions of
salinity (%0) during
low riverdischarge
96survey on 11 June 2002 at
(a)
1m and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.7 Vertical distributions of
salinity (%0) during high
riverdischarge
at(a)
97transect 1
(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(across shore)
survey on 8November 2001.
4.8 Vertical distributions of
salinity (%0) during high
riverdischarge
at 98transect 1
(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(across shore)
survey on 17October
2001.4.9 Vertical distributions of
salinity (%0) during
low riverdischarge
at 99transect 1
(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(across shore)
survey on17
January
2002.4.10 Horizontal distribution of
temperature (oC) during high
riverdischarge
101surveys on
(a)
25September
2001 and(b)
7May
2002.4.11 Horizontal distributions of
temperature (oC) during high
river 102discharge
survey on 25 October 2002 at(a)
1m and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.12 Horizontal distributions of
temperature (oC) during high
river 102discharge
survey on 7May
2002 at(a)
1m and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.13 Horizontal distribution of
temperature (oC) during
low riverdischarge
104surveys on
(a)
20January
and(b)
11 June 2002.4.14 Horizontal distributions of
temperature (oC) during
low riverdischarge
105 survey on 20January
2002 in(a)
1.5m and(b)
3 mdepth.
4.15 Horizontal distributions of
temperature (oC) during
low riverdischarge
105survey on 11 June 2002 in
(a)
1m and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.16 Vertical distributions of
temperature (oC) during high
riverdischarge
106at
(a)
transect 1(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(across shore)
survey on 25
September
2001.4.17 Vertical distributions of
temperature (oC) during high
riverdischarge
107at
(a)
transect 1(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(across shore)
survey on 8 November 2001.
4.18 Vertical distributions of
temperature (oC) during
low riverdischarge
at 108(a)
transect 1(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(across shore)
surveyon 20
January
2002.4.19 Vertical distributions of
temperature (oC) during
low riverdischarge
at 109(a)
transect 1(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(across shore)
surveyon 11 June 2002.
4.20 Horizontal distribution of
density (kgm3) during high
riverdischarge
111surveys on
(a)
28July
2001 and(b)
8 November 2001.4.21 Horizontal distributions of
density (kgm·3) during high
riverdischarge
112survey on 28
July
2001 at(a)
1.5 m and(b)
2.5 mdepth.
4.22 Horizontal distributions of
density (kgm-3) during high
riverdischarge
112survey on 8 November 2001 at
(a)
1m and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.23 Horizontal distribution of
density (kgm·3) during
low riverdischarge
113 surveys on(a)
6February
and(b)
6 June 2002.4.24 Horizontal distributions of
density (kgm·3) during
low riverdischarge
114survey
on 6February
2002 in(a)
1 m and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.25 Horizontal distributions of
density (kgm·3) during
low riverdischarge
115survey on 6 June 2002 in
(a)
2 m and(b)
3 mdepth.
4.26 Vertical distributions of
density (kgm'3) during high
riverdischarge
at 116(a)
transect 1(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(cross shore)
surveyon 28
July
2001.4.27 Vertical distributions of
density (kgm·3) during
low riverdischarge
at 118(a)
transect 1(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(cross shore)
surveyon 6 June 2002.
4.28 Horizontal distribution of TSS
(rnql") during high
riverdischarge
119surveys on
(a)
8 November 2001 and(b)
28April
2002.4.29 Horizontal distribution of TSS
(rnql") during
low riverdischarge
120surveys on
(a)
12January
and(b)
11 June 2002.4.30
Monthly
meansuspended
sediment(tones/month) hydrographs
for 121the Muda River between 1976 and 2002
(26 years)
at JambatanSyed
Omar station(Source: DID).
4.31 Muda River
discharge (rrr's")
versussuspended
sediment loads 122(tones
perday)
between 1976 and 2002(Source: DID).
xvii
4.32
Monthly
meansuspended
sediment(tones/month) hydrographs
for 123the Muda River
during
the month of surveys between 2001 and 2002 at JambatanSyed
Omar station.4.33
Diagram
ofdaily
riverdischarge (m3/s)
andsuspended
sediment 124(tones/day)
at station JambatanSyed
Omarduring
the months ofsurvey.
4.34 Muda River
discharge (m3s·1)
versussuspended
sediment load(ton
128per
day)
for the year of 2001.4.35 Muda River
discharge (rrr's')
versussuspended
sediment load(ton
128per
day)
for the year of 2002.4.36 Horizontal distribution of
salinity (%o)
inspring
tide condition for flood 130tide,
survey on 17 October2001,
and(b)
ebb to flood tide survey on12
August
2002.4.37 Horizontal distribution of
salinity (%0)
inspring
tide condition survey 132on 17 October 2001 at
(a)
1.5 and(b)
2.5 mdepth.
4.38 Horizontal distribution of
salinity (%0)
inspring
tide condition survey 132on 12
August
2001 at(a)
1 and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.39 Horizontal distribution of
salinity (%0)
in neap tide condition for ebb 133tide, surveyed
on 25 October 2001 and(b)
flood tide survey on 7Apri12002.
4.40 Horizontal distribution of
salinity (%0)
in neap tide condition survey on 134 25 October 2001 at(a)
1 and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.41 Horizontal distribution of
salinity (%0)
in neap tide condition survey on 135 7April
2002 at(a)
1.5 and(b)
2.5 mdepth.
4.42 Vertical distributions of
salinity (%0) during spring
tide at transect 1 136(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(across shore)
survey on 17 October 2001.4.43 Vertical distributions of
salinity (%o) during
neap tide at transect 1 137(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(across shore)
survey on 25 October2001.
4.44 Horizontal distribution of
temperature (oC)
inspring
tide condition for 138(a)
floodtide,
survey on 13February
2002 and(b)
ebb to flood tidesurvey on 12
August
2002.4.45 Horizontal distribution of
temperature (oC)
inspring
tide condition 139 survey on 13February
2002 at(a)
1 and(b)
1.5 mdepth.
4.46 Horizontal distribution of
temperature (oC)
inspring
tide condition 140 survey on 12August
2001 at(a)
1 and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.47 Horizontal distribution of
temperature (oC)
in neap tide condition for 141(a)
ebbtide, surveyed
on 25September
2001 and(b)
flood tidesurveyed
on 7April
2002.4.48 Horizontal distribution of
temperature (oC)
in neap tide condition 142 survey on 25September
2001 at(a)
1 and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.49 Horizontal distribution of
temperature (oC)
in neap tide condition 143survey on 7
April
2002 at(a)
1.5 and(b)
2.5 mdepth.
4.50 Vertical distributions of
temperature (oC) during spring
tide at transect 144 1(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(across shore)
survey on 13February
2002.4.51 Vertical distributions of
temperature (oC) during
neap tide at transect 145 1(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(across shore)
survey on 25September
2001.4.52 Horizontal distribution of
density (kgm-3)
inspring
tide condition for 146 survey on(a)
17 October 2001 and(b)
11 June 2002.4.53 Horizontal distribution of
density (kgm-3)
inspring
tide condition 147survey on 17 October 2001 at
(a)
1.5 and(b)
2.5 mdepth.
4.54 Horizontal distribution of
density (kgm-3)
inspring
tide condition 147survey on 11 June 2002 at
(a)
1 and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.55 Horizontal distribution of
density' (kgm-3)
in neap tide condition for(a)
148flood
tide,
survey on 6 June 2002 and(b)
ebb tide survey on 28July
2001.
4.56 Horizontal distribution of
density (kgm-3)
in neap tide condition survey 150on 6
February
2002 at(a)
1 and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.57 Horizontal distribution of
density (kgm-3)
in neap tide condition survey 150on 28
July
2001 at(a)
1.5 and(b)
2.5 mdepth
4.58 Vertical distributions of
density (kgm-3) during spring
tide at transect 1 151(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(across shore)
survey on 17 October 2001.4.59 Vertical distributions of
density (kgm-3) during
neap tide at transect 1 153(along shore)
and(b)
transect 2(across shore)
survey on 7April
2002.
4.60 Horizontal distribution of TSS
(rnql") during spring
tide at floodtide,
155surveyed
on 12January
2002 and(b)
ebb to flood tide survey on 28Apri12002.
4.61 Horizontal distribution of TSS
(rnql") during
neap tide at(a)
ebb to 156flood
tide, surveyed
on 17January
2002 and(b)
flood to ebb tidesurvey on 4
July
2002.4.62 Horizontal distribution of
(a) salinity (%0) during strong
wind surveys 157on
(a)
28July
2001 and(b)
12January
2002.4.63 Horizontal distribution of
(a) salinity (%0) during
weak wind surveys on 158(a)
17 October 2001 and(b)
12August
2002.4.64 Horizontal distribution of
temperature (oe) during strong
wind surveys 159on
(a)
25 October 2001 and(b)
28 March 2002.4.65 Horizontal distribution of
temperature (oC) during
weak wind surveys 159on
(a)
17January
2002 and(b)
4July
2002.xix
4.66 Horizontal distribution of
density (kgm-3) during strong
wind surveys 160on
(a)
13February
2002 and(b)
7April
2002.4.67 Horizontal distribution of
density (kgrn-3) during
weakwind surveys on 161(a)
8 November 2001 and(b)
12August
2002.4.68 Horizontal distribution of TSS
(rnql") during strong
wind surveys on 162(a)
25September
2001 and(b)
28 March 2002.4.69 Horizontal distribution of TSS
(mql") during
weak wind surveys on(a)
16317 October 2001 and
(b)
6 June 2002.4.70 Tide
prediction (m)
dataduring
theday
of survey on 11September
1642004
4.71 Water level observations
(m)
on 11September
2004(spring tide).
1644.72 Tide
prediction (m)
dataduring
theday
of survey on 25September
1652004.
4.73 Water level observations
(m)
on 25September
2004(neap tide).
1654.74 Measured current
magnitude (m/s)
on 11September
2004. 1664.75 Measured current direction
(deg).
on 11September
2004. 1664.76 Measured current
magnitude (m/s)
on 25September
2004. 1674.77 Measured current direction
(deg)
on 25September
2004. 1674.78 Distribution of
(a)
the survey stations and(b)
currentmagnitude
170(ern/s)
and direction(deg)
at 0.5 mdepth,
survey on 12August
2005.4.79 Distribution of the current
magnitude (ern/s)
and direction(deg),
170survey on 12
August
2005 at(a)
1 m and(b)
2 mdepth.
4.80 Distribution of current
magnitude (em/s)
and direction(deg)
at 3m 171depth,
survey on 12August
2005.4.81 Distributions of
temperature
at(a)
1 m and(b)
2 mdepth
survey on 172 12August
2005.4.82 Distributions of
salinity
at(a)
1 m and(b)
2 mdepth
survey on 12 173August
2005.4.83 Distributions of
density
at(a)
1 m and(b)
2 mdepth
survey on 12 173August
2005.4.84 Vertical distribution of
temperature (oe)
atalong
shore transect 174survey
on 12August
2005.4.85 Vertical distribution of
salinity (%0)
atalong
shore transect survey on 175 12August
2005.4.86 Vertical distribution of
density (kgm-3)
atalong
shore transect survey 175on 12
August
2005.4.87
Salinity-density diagrams along
the date of surveys. 1874.88 Schematic
diagrams
in 3D model of thesalinity
distribution in the 195 Muda coastal water for(a) spring
tide is characterizedby stronger
energy
(bigger arrow),
isohaline is closer to the coastline and thehomogenous pattern
and(b)
neap tide is characterizedby
weakerenergy
(smaller arrow),
isohaline is further to coastline and stratifiedpattern.
4.89 Horizontal distribution of
(a) salinity (%0)
and(b) temperature (oC)
211survey on 8 November 2001.
4.90 Horizontal distribution of
(a) salinity (%o)
and(b) temperature (oC)
211survey on 7
May
2002.4.91 Horizontal distribution of
(a) salinity (%0)
and(b) temperature (oC)
212survey on 12
January
2002.4.92 Horizontal distribution of
(a) salinity (%0)
and(b) temperature (oC)
213survey on 6 June 2002.
4.93 Horizontal distribution of
temperature (oC)
survey on(a).
17 October 2152001 and
(b).
28 March 2002.4.94 An aerial
digital image
over the Muda coastal water,showing
the 218distinct
edge
ofestuary plume, captured
on 28July
2001. Theplume pattern
was identifiedby
field observation(TSS) during
similar date(insert Figure).
4.95
Sequence
of aerialdigital images
over the Muda coastal water, 220showing
the distinctedge
ofestuary plume, captured
on 20January
2002. The
plume pattern
was identifiedby
field observation(TSS) during
similar date(insert Figure).
4.96
Sequence
of aerialdigital images
over the Muda coastalwater,
223showing
the distinctedge
ofestuary plume, captured
on 9 March2002. The
plume pattern
was identifiedby
field observation(TSS) during
similar date(insert Figure).
4.97
Sequence
of aerialdigital images
over the Muda coastalwater,
225showing
the distinctedge
ofestuary plume, captured
on 1September
2003.
5.1 Surface horizontal distributions of
salinity (%0) during (a) high
river 236discharge,
on 26 October2002,
and(b)
low riverdischarge,
on 23March 2003.
5.2 Vertical distributions of
salinity (%0) during high
riverdischarge,
on 20 238May
2003 at(a)
transect1, along estuary
and(b)
transect2,
acrossestuary.
5.3 Vertical distributions of
salinity (%0) during
low riverdischarge
on 17 239June 2003 at
(a)
transect1, along estuary
and(b)
transect2,
acrossestuary.
5.4 Surface horizontal distributions of
temperature (oC) during (a) high
241river
discharge,
on 26 October 2002 and(b)
low riverdischarge,
on23 March 2003.
xxi
5.5 Vertical distributions of
temperature (oC) during high
riverdischarge
242on 19
May
2003 at(a)
transect1, along estuary
and(b)
transect 2,across
estuary.
5.6 Vertical distributions of
temperature (oC) during
low riverdischarge
243on 7 June 2003 at
(a)
transecti, along estuary
and(b)
transect2,
across
estuary.
5.7
Diagram
of maximumtemperature (oC)
at stationPenang Airport
244during
the months of survey in(a) May
and(b)
June 2003.5.8 Surface horizontal distributions of
density (kgm·3) during (a) high
river 246discharge,
survey on 26 October 2002 and(b)
low riverdischarge,
survey on 22 March 2003.
5.9 Vertical distributions of
density (kgm·3) during high
riverdischarge
at 247(a)
transectt, along estuary
and(b)
transect2,
acrossestuary,
survey on 20
May
2003.5.10 Vertical distributions of
density (kgm·3) during
low riverdischarge
at 248(a)
transectt, along estuary
and(b)
transect2,
acrossestuary,
survey on 7 June 2003.
5.11 Surface horizontal distribution of TSS
(rnql") during (a) high
river 250discharge,
survey on 26 October 2002 and(b)
low riverdischarge,
survey on 07 June 2003.
5.12 Surface horizontal distributions of Secchi
depth (em) during (a) high
252river
discharge,
survey on 26 October 2002 and(b)
low riverdischarge,
survey on 22 March 2003.5.13 Surface horizontal
distributions'
ofsalinity (%0) during spring tide,
253survey on 17 June 2003 and
(b)
neaptide,
survey on 7 June 2003.5.14 Vertical
distributions;
ofsalinity (%0) during spring
tide at(a)
transect 255t, along estuary
and(b)
transect2,
acrossestuary,
survey on 23March 2003,
5.15 Vertical distributions of
salinity (%0) during
neap tide at(a)
transect1,
256along estuary
and(b)
transect2,
acrossestuary,
survey on 7 June2003.
5.16 Surface horizontal distribution of
temperature (oC) during spring tide,
258survey on 17 June 2003 and
(b)
neaptide,
survey on 7 June 2003.5.17 Vertical distributions of
temperature (oC) during spring
tide at(a)
259transect
t. along estuary
and(b)
transect2,
acrossestuary,
surveyon 17 June 2003.
5.18 Vertical distributions of
temperature (oC) during
neap tide at(a)
260transect
1, along estuary
and(b)
transect2,
acrossestuary,
surveyon 7 June 2003.
'
5.19 Surface horizontal distributions of
density (kgm·3) during spring tide,
262 survey on 17 June 2003 and(b)
neaptide,
survey on 7 June 2003.5,20 Vertical distributions of
density (kqrn") during spring
tide at(a)
263transect
t, along estuary
and(b)
transect2,
acrossestuary,
surveyon 17 June 2003.
5.21 Vertical distributions of
density (kgm-3) during
neap tide at(a)
transect 2651, along estuary
and(b)
transect2,
acrossestuary,
survey on 7 June2003
5.22 Surface horizontal distributions of TSS
(rnql") during spring tide,
266survey on 22 March 2003 and
(b)
neaptide,
survey on 7 June 2003.5.23 Surface horizontal distributions of Secchi
depth (ern) during spring
268tide,
survey on 22 March 2003 and(b)
neaptide,
survey on 7 June2003.
5.24 Surface horizontal distribution of
salinity (%0) during strong wind,
269survey on 17 June 2003 and
(b)
weakwind,
survey on 23 March 2003.5.25 Surface horizontal
distributions'
oftemperature (oe) during strong
270wind,
survey on 22 March 2003 and(b)
weakwind,
survey on 26October 2002.
5.26 Surface horizontal distributions of
density (kgm-3) during strong wind,
271 survey on 22 March 2003 and(b)
weakwind,
survey on 23 March2003.
5.27 Surface horizontal distributions of TSS
(mgr1) during strong wind,
272 survey on 7 June 2003 and(b)
weakwind,
survey on 26 October2002.
5.28 Surface horizontal distributions of Secchi
depth (cm) during strong
273wind,
survey on 22 March 2003 and(b)
weakwind,
survey on 23March 2003.
5.29 Distribution of
(a)
the survey stations and(b)
currentmagnitude
275(cm/s)
and direction(deg)
at 0.5 mdepth,
survey on 12August
2005.5.30 Distribution of the current
magnitude (cm/s)
anddirection (deg),
276survey on 12
August
2005 at(a)
1 m and(b)
2 mdepth.
5.31 Distributions of
temperature
at(a)
1 m and(b)
2 mdepth
survey on 27712
August
2005.5.32 Distributions of
salinity
at(a)
1 m and(b)
2 mdepth
survey on 12 278Aug
ust 2005.5.33 Distributions of
density
at(a)
1 m and(b)
2 mdepth
survey on 12 278August
2005.5.34 Vertical distribution of current
magnitude (cm/s)
at(a)
transect1,
279along estuary
and(b)
transect2,
acrossestuarysurvey
on 12August
2005.
5.35 Vertical distribution of
temperature (oe)
at(a)
transect1, along
280estuary
and(b)
transect2,
acrossestuary
survey on 12August
2005.5.36 Vertical distribution of
salinity (%0)
at(a)
transect1, along estuary
and 281(b)
transect2,
acrossestuary
survey on 12August
2005.5.37 Vertical distribution of
density (kgm-3)
at(a)
transect1, along estuary
282and
(b)
transect2,
acrossestuary
survey on 12August
2005.xxiii