4HE$ESIGN)MPROVEMENTOF(IP)MPLANTFOR4OTAL(IP2EPLACEMENT4(2
3OLEHUDDINBIN3HUIB"ARKAWIBIN3AHARI!MRANBIN!HMED3HOKRIAND#HEW3OON#HAI
3CHOOLOF-ECHANICAL%NGINEERING
%NGINEERING#AMPUS5NIVERSITI3AINS-ALAYSIA .IBONG4EBAL3EBERANG0ERAI
-ALAYSIA
%MAILMESHUIB ENGUSMMY
)NSTITUTEOF!DVANCED4ECHNOLOGY 5NIVERSITI0UTRA-ALAYSIA 3ERDANG3ELANGOR
-ALAYSIA
$EPARTMENTOF/RTHOPEDICS 3CHOOLOF-EDICAL3CIENCES(EALTH#AMPUS
5NIVERSITI3AINS-ALAYSIA +UBANG+ERIAN+ELANTAN
-ALAYSIA
2ECEIVED$ATETH!UGUST !CCEPTED$ATETH-ARCH
!"342!#4
(IPIMPLANTSAREARTIlCIALJOINTSTHATAREMADEOFMETALSUCHASTITANIUMORSTAINLESSSTEELANDHAVELONG STEMSWHICHPENETRATEDEEPINTOTHEFEMURCANALTOHOLDTHEMINPLACE)TISGENERALLYUSEDWHENTHERE ISBIOLOGICALDAMAGEINHUMANHIPJOINT2ESEARCHALSOSHOWSTHATTHENUMBEROFPERSONTHATUNDERWENT THISTYPEOFSURGICALOPERATIONISINCREASINGEVERYYEARESPECIALLYFORTHEELDERLYWITHTHEAGEGROUPOF ANDABOVE4HEPURPOSEOFTHISPROJECTISTOSTUDYIMPROVEMENTSONHIPIMPLANTANDPROPOSEADESIGNTHAT MOSTLYFULlLLSTHEASPECTSFORDESIGNINGAHIPIMPLANT4HEREAREMANYASPECTSTOCONSIDERINDESIGNING HIPIMPLANTSUCHASSTIFFNESSIMPLANTCHARACTERISTICANDSIZEOFTHEIMPLANT-ATERIALSAREALSOONEOFTHE MOSTIMPORTANTASPECTSINDESIGNINGAHIPIMPLANTBECAUSEITHASAPOSITIVERELATIONTOTHESTIFFNESSOFTHE IMPLANT4HEMATERIALSTHATCOMMONLYUSEDARE4ITANIUMAND3TAINLESSSTEEL4HEANALYSISWASPERFORMED BYUSING#/3-/37ORKS3OFTWARE)THELPEDINSTUDYINGTHERELIABILITYFAILUREANDOPTIMUMSTRESSTHAT THENEWLYDESIGNEDIMPLANTCANWITHSTAND)NTHISPROJECTTHERESULTSSHOWEDTHATTHEFACTOROFSAFETY
&/3 OFTHEIMPLANTIS
+EYWORDS(IPIMPLANTlNITEELEMENTANALYSIS
!"342!+
!LATGANTITULANGPAHAADALAHSENDIPALSUYANGDIPERBUATDARIPADALOGAMSEPERTI4ITANIUMATAUBESITAHAN KARAT)AJUGAMEMPUNYAITANGKAISTEM PANJANGYANGMENEMBUSIDALAMKESALURANTULANGPAHAUNTUK
MENAHANIAPADATEMPATNYA)ABIASADIGUNAKANAPABILATERDAPATKEROSAKANBIOLOGIDALAMSENDI PAHAKITA0ENYELIDIKANJUGATELAHMENUNJUKKANBILANGANORANGYANGMELAKUKANPEMBEDAHANJENISINI MENINGKATDARITAHUNKETAHUNTERUTAMANYABAGIMEREKAYANGMENJANGKAUTAHUNKEATAS4UJUAN PROJEKINIADALAHUNTUKMENGKAJITENTANGPENAMBAHBAIKANTERHADAPALATGANTITULANGPAHADANCUBA MENGHASILKANSATUREKABENTUKYANGPALINGMEMENUHIASPEKDALAMMEREKABENTUKSEBUAHALATGANTI TULANGPAHA4ERDAPATBANYAKASPEKYANGPERLUKITAPERTIMBANGKANDALAMMEREKABENTUKSESEBUAHALAT GANTITULANGPAHASEPERTIKEKERASANBENTUKSIFATPENCUCUKANDANSAIZ"AHANJUGAMERUPAKANSATUASPEK YANGPENTINGDALAMMEREKABENTUKSESEBUAHALATGANTITULANGPAHAKERANAIAMENGAWALCIRICIRIBAHAN DANKEKUKUHAN"AHANYANGBIASADIGUNAKANADALAH4ITANIUMDANBESITAHANKARAT"ERDASARKANREKA BENTUKYANGDIHASILKANANALISISDILAKUKANTERHADAPREKABENTUKBERDASARKANTEGANGANDANKECACATAN DENGAN MENGGUNAKAN #/3-/37ORKS 3OFTWARE 0ERISIAN INI TELAH MEMBANTU KEBOLEHPERCAYAAN KEGAGALANDANDAYAOPTIMUMYANGDAPATDITAMPUNGOLEHALATGANTIPAHAYANGDIREKABENTUK+EPUTUSAN MENUNJUKKANFAKTORKESELAMATANBAGIALATGANTIPAHAYANGBARUIALAH
+ATAKUNCI!LATGANTITULANGPAHAKAEDAHUNSURTERHINGGA
).42/$5#4)/.
(IPIMPLANTSAREMADEOFMETALSUCHASTITANIUM OR STAINLESSSTEEL AND HAVE LONG STEMS WHICH PENETRATE DEEP INTO THE FEMUR CANAL CENTER OF THE THIGH BONE TO HOLD THEM IN PLACE )N A SURGICAL OPERATION KNOWN AS 0RIMARY4OTAL (IP 2EPLACEMENT 04(2 THE SURGEON DRILLS A HOLE DOWNTHEFEMORALCANALANDINSERTSTHEIMPLANT lRMLY INTO THE HOLE SOMETIMES USING SPECIAL CEMENTTOENSURETHATTHEIMPLANTSTAYSTIGHTLY lXEDINPLACE
4YPICALLYTHESEIMPLANTSBEGINTOLOOSENOR OTHERWISEFAILAFTERYEARSATWHICHPOINT THE IMPLANT NEEDS TO BE SURGICALLY REPLACED 4HIS PROCEDURE IS KNOWN AS 2EVISION4OTAL (IP 2EPLACEMENT3URGERY24(2 !CTUALLYREVISIONOF PROSTHESESISANEXPENSIVESOMETIMESDANGEROUS ANDALWAYSPSYCHOLOGICALLYCOSTLYFORTHEPATIENT HENCE THE PROCEDURE HAS TO BE AVOIDED IF POSSIBLE -OSTLY IMPLANT WILL FAIL BECAUSE OF THESEFEWEFFECTSLIKECORROSIONWEARFATIGUEAND OTHERDESIRABLEAGENTS)NTHISSURGERYTHEFAILING ORTHOPEDICHIPIMPLANTISREPLACEDWITHANEW ONEBYREMOVINGTHEOLDIMPLANTREMOVINGTHE BONECEMENTENLARGINGTHEIMPLANTCAVITYAND INSERTINGTHENEWIMPLANT24(2ISMORECOMPLEX THAN04(2ITREQUIRESMORECAPABILITIESANDHAS MORE UNCERTAINTY ASSOCIATED WITH IT 3URGEONS MUSTPLANFORANDREMOVETHEOLDIMPLANTANDTHE OLDCEMENTBEFORECUTTINGTHENEWCANALCAVITY 4HEYMUSTPLANFORTHENEWCAVITYINTHEPRESENCE OFTHEOLDIMPLANTANDCEMENT4HISRESULTSINA LONGERSURGERYWITHGREATERRISKTOTHEPATIENTS 3OANEWDESIGNOFHIPIMPLANTWILLBECARRIED OUT WITH HIGHER RELIABILITY AND DURABILITY &EW DESIGNPARAMETERSALSOWILLBEADDEDTOINCREASE ITSSTABILITY
,)4%2!452%2%6)%7
!LTHOUGH4(2HASBEENSUCCESSFULOVERYEARS COMPLICATIONS DUE TO INTERFACE LOOSENING AND BONE RESORPTION IN THE CALCAR REGION STILL EXIST /NEOFTHEMAJORISSUESISTHEEFFECTOFIMPLANT MATERIALPROPERTIESONBONELOSSANDINTERFACE LOOSENING IN4(2 +ATOOZIAN ET AL 3O IMPLANTMATERIALSAREONEOFTHEMOSTIMPORTANT COMPONENTOFAHIPIMPLANTDESIGNTHATCANLAST LONG
-OST COMMONLY THE LONG FEMORAL ELEMENT IS MADE OF STAINLESS STEEL #OBALT #HROMIUM
#O#R ALLOYS OR 4ITANIUM 4I ALLOYS &OR A BETTER PERFORMANCE4I ALLOYS IS SUGGESTED DUE TO ITS IMPROVEMENT IN WEAR PROPERTIES IN4(2 COMPARED WITH OTHERS MATERIALS )N ADDITION TO THAT4I ALLOYS ARE ALSO FAVORABLE FOR THEIR IMPRESSIVE BIOCOMPATIBILITY HIGH CORROSION RESISTANCE AND SPECIlC MECHANICAL PROPERTIES 0OHLER "ESIDESTHATTITANIUMIMPLANTSARE NOTFERROMAGNETICANDDONOTCAUSEHARMTOTHE PATIENTINMAGNETRESONANCEIMAGING-2) UNITS
&ORINTERNALlXATIONTITANIUMIMPLANTSAREALWAYS ANALTERNATIVETOSTAINLESSSTEELFORPATIENTSWHO AREALLERGICTONICKEL
4I ALLOYS HAVE LOWER MODULUS OF ELASTICITY WHEN COMPARED TO #O#R-O ALLOYS 3AMIENTO ET AL HAS COMPARED THE LONG TERM PERFORMANCE OF THESE TWO DIFFERENT ALLOYS AS FEMORALCOMPONENTS7ITHLOWERMODULUSSTEM THEREWASASIGNIlCANTLYLOWERINCIDENCEOFSTRESS SHIELDING(OWEVERTHISWASATTHEEXPENSEOFA SIGNIlCANTLY HIGHER INCIDENCE OF BONECEMENT INTERFACERADIOLUCENCY
4HE APPLICATION OF BIOACTIVE COATINGS TO 4I BASED ALLOYS ENHANCE THE ADHESION OF4I BASEDIMPLANTTOTHEEXISTINGBONERESULTINGIN
SIGNIlCANTLYBETTERIMPLANTLIFETIMETHATCANBE ACHIEVEDWITHMATERIALSINUSETODAY3LOTENET AL
:IRCONIA OR ZIRCONIUM OXIDE IS THE MATERIAL OFCHOICECURRENTLYFORBALLHEADSBECAUSEOFITS HIGHSTRENGTHANDLOWWEARRATE!FFATATOETAL
4HElRSTPAPERTOREPORTTHEUSEOFZIRCONIA IN BIOMEDICAL APPLICATIONS WAS IN AND THElRSTPAPERILLUSTRATINGTHEUSEOFZIRCONIATO MANUFACTUREBALLHEADSFOR4(2WASREPORTEDIN (ELMER AND $RISKELL #ONSIDERABLE RESEARCH HAS FOCUSED ON ZIRCONIA AND YTTRIA CERAMICSTHATARECHARACTERIZEDBYlNEGRAINED MICROSTRUCTURES4HEREAREAUTHORSWHOPROPOSE CERAMICSBALLHEADMADEOFAMIXOFZIRCONIUM OXIDEANDALUMINIUMOXIDECLAIMINGAGAINHIGHER
STRENGTHS AND LOWER WEAR RATES (ELMER AND
$RISKELL
4HERE ARE FOUR DESIGN PARAMETERS THAT HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED IN DESIGNING THE STEM OF HIP IMPLANT NAMELY SHAPES STEPS FLUTES AND SLOTS4O INCREASE STEM ROTATIONAL STABILITY DISTAL mUTES HAVE BEEN INCORPORATED INTO THE STEM DESIGN 2OTATIONAL STABILITY REMAINS THE PRIMARY CONCERN OF ANY FEMORAL COMPONENT 4HESESLOTSSERVETOREDUCEDISTALSTEMSTIFFNESS ALLOWINGTHESTEMTOmEXWITHTHEFEMURDURING NORMALDAILYACTIVITY4HISFEATUREHASHISTORICALLY DEMONSTRATEDREDUCEDTHIGHPAIN#AMERONET AL )NADDITIONITHELPSTOREDUCECHANCES
&)'52%&INALDESIGNWITHDESCRIPTION
OFINTRAOPERATIVEFEMORALFRACTURESDURINGSTEM INSERTION"ULLETEDGEOMETRYHELPSREDUCEDISTAL POINTLOADINGWHILECREATINGASMOOTHTRANSITION ZONEFORLOADTRANSFER-C4IGHEETAL
$%3)'.$%6%,/0-%.4!.$!.!,93)3
&ROMALLTHEPARAMETERSANDCONSIDERATIONSTHAT HAVEBEENTAKENHEREARETHElNALDESIGNSTHAT HAVEBEENMADEASSHOWNIN&IGURE
&%ANALYSISWASPERFORMEDONTHEDESIGNED MODELFORITSSTRESSDISTRIBUTIONANDDEFORMATION -ODELS WERE GENERATED ANALYZED AND POST PROCESSEDUSING#/3-/37ORKS
"ASEDONTHERESULTOBTAINEDFROMSIMULATION IT IS NOT SUFlCIENT TO PROVE THAT IMPROVEMENT HAS BEEN MADE THIS MODEL OF HIP IMPLANT
6ALIDATIONPROCESSHASTOBEMADEBYCOMPARING THE RESULTS FROM SIMULATION WITH LITERATURE "Y COMPARINGTHERESULTSTHEDIFFERENCESBETWEEN THEPROPOSEDMODELWITHTHEEXISTINGMODELCAN BEANALYZED
-ANN ET AL HAVE CARRIED OUT SOME RESEARCH ON LOADING CASES IN PEOPLE WALKING ESPECIALLY DURING TWO CONDITIONS NAMELY STRENUOUS LOADING CASE AND POSTOPERATIVE LOADING CASES 3TRENUOUS LOADING CASE WAS ESTIMATEDBASEDONLOADINGINANACTIVEINDIVIDUAL WHEREAS POSTOPERATIVE LOADING WAS BASED ON LOADINGDURINGPATIENTREHABILITATIONPERIOD4HE LOADSAPPLIEDAREASSHOWNIN4ABLE!BODYOF
WEIGHTOF.WASUSED4HESTRENUOUSLOADING DATAWASOBTAINEDFROM0AUL ANDWOULD REPRESENTGAITINANACTIVEANDHEALTHYINDIVIDUAL 4HE POSTOPERATIVE LOADING CASES WERE BASED ONCRUTCHASSISTEDGAITDATAINAPOSTOPERATIVE SITUATIONANDWEREBASEDONINVIVOJOINTREACTION FORCE$AVYETAL
"ESIDES IN ORDER TO MAKE SURE THAT THE DESIGNED MODEL CAN FUNCTION WELL IN ANY
CONDITION SO THE DESIGNED MODEL IS ANALYZED IN STUMBLING CONDITION )N THIS CASE RESEARCH DONEBY%L3HEIKHETAL ONlNITEELEMENT SIMULATIONOFTHEHIPJOINTDURINGSTUMBLINGWAS REFERRED4HE STUMBLING CONDITION WAS CHOSEN SIMPLY BECAUSE IT PRODUCES PEAK LOAD DURING HUMANACTIVITY
&OR STATIC ANALYSIS THE MAXIMUM STUMBLING RESULTANTFORCE&ONTHEHEADOFTHEFEMURIS TIMESTHEBODYWEIGHT"7KG ATOF THEGAITCYCLE"ESIDES%L3HEIKHETAL ALSO CONSIDEREDTHEMUSCLELOADMAGNITUDEAPPLIED TOTHE&%MODELASSHOWNIN4ABLE
3INCEMATERIALISANIMPORTANTPARAMETERTHAT CANAFFECTPERFORMANCEOFHIPIMPLANTTHERESULTS FORTHREEMAINTYPESOFMATERIALFORTHESTEMWERE THENCOMPARED
2%35,43
"ASED ON COMPARISON BETWEEN THE RESULTS FROM THE RESEARCH OF -ANN ET AL AND THATOFPROPOSEDDESIGNITCANBESEENTHATTHE MAXIMUMSTRESSFROM-ANNWASAPPROXIMATELY -0A WHILE FOR THE PROPOSED DESIGN THE
4!",%,OADINGCASESUSEDINTHElNITEELEMENTMODELS
,OADINGCASE
(EADLOAD COMPONENTS
[XYZ].
(EADLOAD MAGNITUDE
X"7
'REATER TROCHANTERLOAD
COMPONENTS [XYZ].
'REATER TROCHANTERLOAD
MAGNITUDE X"7
3TRENUOUS
0OSTOPERATIVE
4!",%-USCLELOADMAGNITUDESAPPLIEDTOTHE&%MODEL%L3HEIKHETAL
&ORCECOMPONENT. 'LUTEUSMEDIUS. 'LUTEUSMINIMUS. )LIOTIBIALBAND.
&X
&Y
&Z
4HESEALLLOADSCANBERESOLVEDINTO
&X.&Y.&Z.
MAXIMUMSTEMWASABOUT-0A&ROMSTRESS DISTRIBUTION IT WAS SEEN THAT THE MAXIMUM STRESS OF THE PROPOSED DESIGN REACHED -0A IN THE NECK PART4HIS VALUE HOWEVER CAN NOTBECOMPAREDWITH-ANNETAL MODEL BECAUSEITDIDNOTINCLUDETHENECKPARTDURING THESIMULATIONANALYSIS4HEREFOREONLYTHESTRESS ATTHEEDGEOFTHESTEMCANBECOMPARED4HE RESULTS SHOW THAT THE STRESSES IN THE PROPOSED
DESIGNAREMUCHLESSERTHAN-ANNETAL MODEL4HIS MEANS THAT FURTHER IMPROVEMENTS ARENECESSARYINDESIGNINGTHEHIPIMPLANT &OR STUMBLING CONDITION THE RESULTS FROM SIMULATIONARESHOWNIN&IGURES
4HERE ARE THREE MAIN MATERIALS THAT ARE GENERALLYUSEDINTHEFABRICATIONOFTHESTEMPART OFHIPIMPLANT&ORTHESAMEFORCEAPPLIEDTHE RESULTSOFDISPLACEMENTDISTRIBUTIONANDFACTOR OFSAFETY&/3 FORTHESETHREEKINDSOFMATERIAL NAMELY4ITANIUMALLOY4I!L6 3TAINLESS3TEEL , AND #OBALT #HROME #O.I#R-O WILL BE COMPARED&IGURESSHOWSTHEDISPLACEMENTFOR THREE DIFFERENT MATERIALS WHERE THE MAXIMUM AND THE MINIMUM DISPLACEMENT ARE SHOWN
&IGURE PRESENTS THE RESULTS OF THE &ACTOR OF 3AFETY&/3 FORTHESETHREEKINDSOFMATERIALS
$)3#533)/.3
&IGURESHOWSTHATTHEMAXIMUMSTRESSOCCURS ATTHENECKOFTHESTEMWASABOUT-0A4O ENSURETHATTHESTEMISSAFETOUSETHEFACTOROF SAFETY&/3 DISTRIBUTIONWILLBEREFERREDWHERE IT DIVIDES THE STRESS ON THE ELEMENT WITH THE
ULTIMATE TENSILE STRENGTH OF THE4ITANIUM ALLOY MATERIALS
&IGURESHOWSTHATTHEMINIMUM&/3ISAT THE CRITICAL PART WHICH IS AROUND 'ENERALLY FOR DESIGN PURPOSES THE VALUE OF &/3 WILL BE IN THE RANGE OF 4HIS IS TO ENSURE THAT THEREARESOMETOLERANCESONIT&IGURESHOWS THATTHEMAXIMUMDISPLACEMENTISMM AND IT OCCURS ON THE SURFACE WHERE THE LOADS WEREAPPLIED4HATVALUEWASCONSIDEREDSMALL THEREFOREITCANBENEGLECTED2ESULTSOF&IGURES WERESUMMARIZEDIN4ABLE
4HEOVERALLRESULTSSHOWTHATTHE&/3ISALMOST THE SAME FOR THESE THREE KINDS OF MATERIALS 4HE VALUE OF &/3 FOR #OBALT #HROME IS DOUBLE THAT OF THE 3TAINLESS 3TEEL AND4ITANIUM ALLOY
#OBALT#HROMEISTHEBESTMATERIALTOBEUSEDIN FABRICATIONOFHIPIMPLANT
#/.#,53)/.
#EMENTLESSHIPIMPLANTHASBEENCHOSENASTHE MAINFACTORINDESIGNINGTHEIMPLANTlXATION)T ISBELIEVEDTHATITCANBELONGLASTINGCOMPARED TOTHECEMENTEDHIPIMPLANTlXATIONDUETOTHE BREAKINGUPOFCEMENTPARTICLES!NOTHERBENElT OFUSINGCEMENTLESSHIPIMPLANTISTHATITISSAFER DURINGREVISIONSURGERYFORHIPREPLACEMENT 4O AVOID LOOSENING OF HIP IMPLANT FEW CONCEPTS HAVE BEEN ADDED IN THE NEW DESIGN MODELINORDERTOINCREASEITSSTABILITY&LUTESAND STEPSAREADDEDTOPREVENTTHEMOVEMENTOFHIP IMPLANTANDINCREASETHElXATIONOFHIPIMPLANT 3LOTSAREADDEDTOREDUCEBENDINGSTIFFNESSOF THEIMPLANT
4O ENSURE THAT THE DESIGNED IMPLANT WORK VALIDATION HAS BEEN MADE BY COMPARING THE RESULTSWITHEARLIERRESEARCH"YAPPLYINGTHESAME BOUNDARYCONDITIONTHERESULTSSHOWEDTHATTHE STRESS DEVELOPED ON THE DESIGNED IMPLANT ARE MUCHMORELESSTHAN-ANNETAL MODEL 4HISPROVESTHATTHEREARESOMEIMPROVEMENTS INTHEDESIGNEDIMPLANT
!NALYSIS HAS ALSO BEEN DONE ON DIFFERENT MATERIALUSEDINIMPLANT"YAPPLYINGTHESAME CONDITIONOFLOADINGTHEMAXIMUMDISPLACEMENT VALUESARETOOSMALLUNTILCANBENEGLECTED/NLY FORTHEVALUEOF&/3THE#OBALT#HROMEHASTHE VALUEASHIGHAS
&ORALLTHESTUDYANDDESIGNTHATHAVEDONE IT IS BELIEVED THAT THERE ARE IMPROVEMENT OF PERFORMANCE FOR THE DESIGNED HIP IMPLANT IN THECASEOFDURABILITYANDRELIABILITY(OWEVERIN THISPROJECTTHECONCLUSIONONLYCANMAKEFROM THEORETICALRESULTS4HEMAINFACTORTHATINmUENCES THEPERFORMANCEOFHIPIMPLANTSUCHASWEARRATE CANNOT BE DETERMINED IN THIS PROJECT )N ORDER TODETERMINETHEWEARRATETHEBESTMETHODIS BYFABRICATINGAHIPIMPLANTANDINSERTINGITINA PATIENTSBODY5SINGTHISEXPERIMENTALMETHOD THE ACTUAL WEAR RATE OF THE HIP IMPLANT CAN BE CALCULATED IN ORDER FOR THE DURABILITY TO BE KNOWN
!#+./7,%$'%-%.43
4HE AUTHORS ACKNOWLEDGE SUPPORT FROM 53- SHORTTERMGRANTNO
&)'52%3TRESSDISTRIBUTIONDUETOSTUMBLINGCONDITION
&)'52%$ISPLACEMENTDISTRIBUTIONOFHIPIMPLANT
&)'52%&/3DISTRIBUTIONOFDESIGNEDHIPIMPLANT
&)'52%$ISPLACEMENTDISTRIBUTIONFORA #OBALT#HROMEB 3TAINLESS3TEELANDC 4ITANIUMALLOYWHERE THEMAXIMUMDISPLACEMENTAREINTHESAMEPLACEWITHTHEALMOSTSAMEVALUEOFA XM
B XMANDC XM
4!",%2ESULTSOFSIMULATIONFORDIFFERENTMATERIALS
-ATERIALS -AXIMUM
$ISPLACEMENTM &/3
#OBALT#HROME X
3TAINLESS3TEEL X
4ITANIUM!LLOY X
&)'52%&/3DISTRIBUTIONFORA #OBALT#HROMEB 3TAINLESS3TEELANDC 4ITANIUMALLOYWHERETHE MINIMUM&/3VALUESAREA B ANDC
2%&%2%.#%3
!FFATATO34ESTONI-#ACCIARI',AND4ONI!
-IXED OXIDES PROSTHETIC CERAMIC BALL HEADS 0ARTEFFECTOFTHE:R/FRACTIONONTHEWEAR OF CERAMIC ON POLYETHYLENE JOINTS*OURNALSOF
"IOMATERIALS
#AMERON(54RICK,73HEPHERD"$4URNBULL!
.OILES$AND-C4IGHE4!NINTERNATIONAL MULTICENTER STUDY ON HIGH IN IN TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS 3CIENTIFIC %XIBIT !!/3 !NNUAL -EETING
$AVY $4 +OTZAR '- "ROWN 2( (EIPLE +' 'OLBERG6-(EIPLE*R+'"ERILLA*AND"URSTEIN
!( 4ELEMETRIC FORCE MEASUREMENTS ACROSSTHEHIPAFTERTOTALARTHROPLASTY*"ONE*T 3URG!
%L3HEIKH(&-AC$ONALD"*AND(ASHMI-3*
&INITEELEMENTSIMULATIONOFTHEHIPJOINTDURING STUMBLING A COMPARISON BETWEEN STATIC AND DYNAMICLOADING*OURNALOF-ATERIALS0ROCESSING 4ECHNOLOGY
(ELMER *$ AND $RISKELL 4$ 2ESEACH IN BIOCERAMICS IN 0ROCEEDINGSOFTHE3YMPOSIUM ON5SEOF#ERAMICSAS3URGICAL)MPLANTS#LEMSON 5NIVERSITY3#53!
+ATOOZIAN($AVY$4!RSHI!AND3AADATI5 -ATERIAL OPTIMIZATION OF FEMORAL COMPONENT OF TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS USING lBER REINFORCED
POLYMERIC COMPOSITES *OURNAL OF -EDICAL
%NGINEERING0HYSICS
-ANN+!"ARTEL$,7RIGHT4-AND"URSTEIN!(
#OULOMBFRICTIONALINTERFACESINMODELING CEMENTED TOTAL HIP REPLACEMENTS ! MORE REALISTICMODEL*OURNALOF"IOMECHANICS6OL .OPP
-C4IGHE4 #AMERON (5 3MIT - 2EYNOLDS (- +EGGI +* $ESIGN #ONSIDERATIONS &OR ! -ODULAR.ECK)N4OTAL(IP!RTHROPLASTY7ORLD
#ONGRESS ON /STEOARTHRITIS /!23) "ERLIN 'ERMANY
0AUL*0&ORCESATTHEHUMANHIPJOINT0H$THESIS 5NIVERSITYOF'LASGOW'LASGOW3COTLAND 0OHLER/%-5NALLOYEDTITANIUMFORIMPLANTS
INBONESURGERY)NJURY
3AMIENTO!.ATARAJAN6'RUEN4!AND-C-AHON - 2ADIOGRAPHIC PERFORMANCE OF TWO DIFFERENT TOTAL HIP CEMENTED ARTHROPLASTIES
! SURVIVORSHIP ANALYSIS /RTHOP#LIN.ORTH!M
3LOTEN *6 ,ABEY , !UDEKERCKE 26 AND 0ERRE '6 -ATERIALS SELECTION AND DESIGN FOR ORTHOPAEDIC IMPLANTS WITH IMPROVED LONG TERM PERFORMANCE *OURNALOF"IOMATERIALS
