,
THE EFFECTIVENESS OF SCHOOL INTERVENTION PROGRAMS ON
TOBACCO USE, ALCOHOL AND DRUG USE AMONG FORM TWO STUDENTS IN FOUR SECONDARY SCHOOLS IN KOTA BHARU,
KELANTAN.
By
DR. JAIDON BIN ROMLI
Dissertation Submitted In Partial Fulfillment Of The Requirements For The Degree Of Master of Medicine
. UNIVERSITI SAINS MALAYSIA
2001
List ofTabk~
List \.)f Figures
Ackno\vledge1nent
Abstract Abbreviations
Chapter 1 -Introduction
1. 1 Adolescents Health Issues 1.2 Adolescents and Smoking
1.3 Adolescents .Alcohol and Drug Use 1. 4 School Health Promotion and Prevention 1 . 5 School Intervent1 on Program
Chapter ?. - Objectives
2. 0 General Objectives 2. 1 Specific Objectives Chapter 3 - 1\'lethodology
3.0 School Intervention Study 3.1 Subjects and l'v1ethods 3.2 Study Sa1npling
3 3 Data Collection and Handling
3 -+ Health Protnotion School Intervention
Progran1s
3.4. 1Brainstonning
and Questionnaire Preparation3.4.2 Educational
tv1aterials
Page
vi
\'11 j
XVll
ll 20
30 35
40
40
40
41 41
43
.1 ...
"1'.)
-t) 1 -
3.4.3 Questionnaire Pilot Project and Validation 3.4.4 Intervention Programs
3.4.4.1 Pre-intervention Session 3.4.4.2 Intervention Session
3.4.4.2(a) School Health Brigade (SHB) Training, Session.
3.4.4.2(b) Intervention Probrratns to All Form Tv.;o
45 46
46 46
47
students. 50
3.4.4.3 Post-intervention Session 53
3.5 Data Analysis 53
3.5(a) Scoring System 54
3.6
WritingofDissertation
573. 7 Research Presentation 57
3.8 Achievement 57
Chapter
4-
Results 584.1
Distributions of Students by Schools
andGroups.
58 4.2 Distribution of Studentsby
Sex and Race. 59 4.3 Pre-interventionknow1edge,
attitudes, skillsand
practices regarding tobacco use, alcohol and drug
use
for bothgroups.
4.3 .1 Cotnparing mean score, category and p value
of know] edge, attitudes, ski11s and practices
60
of smoking for both groups before intervention. 61
4.3.2 Comparing mean score, category and
pvalue ofkno\vledge, attitudes, skills
and practicesof alcohol and drug use for both &rroups before intervention.
4.4
Differences between pre- and post-intervention , mean score
ineach group of the school in
relation to knowledge, attitudes, skills and practices of smoking.
4.5
Differences bet\veen pre- and post-intervention mean score in each group of the school in relation to knowledge, attitudes, skills and practices of alcohol and drug use.
4.6 Sutnmary ofp value of pre- and post-intervention mean difference of score with
95~oconfidence interval for both groups.
4. 7 Swnmary of scoring category in relation with intervention progams
and pvalue of intervention schools.
4.8A Knowledge of smoking before intervention
4.8A 1Smoking and lung cancer
4.8A2 Passive stnoker and
asthmatic attack.
4.8A3 Anyvvay to stop
smoking.
4.8A4 S1noking in lslmn
62
63
64
65
66 67 67
6869
70
4.8B Attitude to\vards smoking. 71
4.8B Smoking and drug use 71
4.8C Skills and practices of smoking 72
4. 8C1 Tried smoking. 72
4.8C2 Age start smoking. 73
4.8C2(a) Sn1oker with age of start stnoking. 74 4.8C3 Number of cigarette smoking per day. 74 4.8C3(a) Smoker with nutnber of cigarette per day. 75 4.8C4 Duration of time since stop stnoking. 75
4.8C4(a) Stnoker with duration of time since stop stnoking 76
.
4. 8C5
Reason for stop sn1oking.76
4. 8C5( a) Smoker with reason for stop stnoking. 77
4.8D Knovvledge of alcohol use 78
4.8.01
Alcoholuse
and liverdisease. 78
4.8D2 Alcohol use and motor vehicle accident. 794.8D3 We can stop taking alcohol. 80
4.8E Attitude regarding alcohol
use
814.8E Alcohol use in
Islatn.
814.8F Knowledge of drug use. 82
4.8Fl Drug use and physical and mental derangement. 82 4. 8F2 Drug addiction and individualtnood and
behavior ehanges. 83
4.8F3 Anyway
to stop drug use. 844.8G Attitudes toward drug use.
85
4.80 Drug abuse in lslatn. 85 4.8H Skills and practices regarding alcohol and drug use. 86
4.8H1 Tried alcohol use. 86
4.8H2 Tried drug use. 87
4.8H3 Duration since starts taking alcohol. 88 4.8H3(a) Alcohol abuser duration since starts taking alcohol. 89
4.8H4 Duration since starts taking drug. 89
4.8H4(a)
Drug
abuser with duration since start takingdrug. 90
4.8H5 Frequency of taking alcohol for the past one montli.
4.8H5(a) Alcohol user \vith frequency of taking
alcohol for
the pastone n1onth.
4.8H6 Frequency of taking drug for the past
one
month.4.8H6(a) Drug abuser with frequency of taking drug for the past one tnonth.
4.8H7 Duration since stops taking alcohol.
4.8H7(a) Alcohol abuser with duration since stop
taking
drug.4.8H8 Reason for stop taking alcohol or drug.
4.8H8(a) Alcohol or
dntg
user with reason for stop taking alcohol or drug.90
91
91
92
92
93 93
94
4.81 Prevalence of smoking, alcohol and drug use before intervention.
Chapter 5 - Discussion
5.0 The School Intervention Study
5.0.1 The Progress of Intervention Programs.
5.1 Demographic. data.
5.2 The School Health Progratn 5.3
Smoking
HabitsAmong Students.
5.3.0 The prevalence of smoking atnong students.
5.3. I Knowledge of Smoking among Students.
5.3.2 .Attitudes of Students against Smoking.
5.3.3
Skills
to Resist against Smoking.5.3.4 Practices of Smoking among Students.
5. 4
Alcohol
and Drug Useat11ong
Students.5.4.0 The prevalence of alcohol and drug use among students.
5.4.1 Knowledge of alcohol and drug use among
a1nong
students.5.4.2 Attitude of students against alcohol and· drug use.
5.4.3
Skillsto
resist alcoholand
drug usean1ong
students.5.4.4 Practices of alcohol and drug use ainong students.
95 96
96
102 103
105 108 108 108 110 1 11
111
I I 3
113 113114
1 15
116
117
5. 5 The effect of intervention programs on stnoking, alcohol and drug among students.
5.5.0 The kno\vledge, attitudes, skills and practices of smoking.
5. 5.1 The kno\vledge, attitudes, skills and practices ,
in
relationto
alcohol and druguse.
Chapter 6 -Conclusions
6.1 Smoking among students.
6.2 Alcohol and drug use among students.
6.3 The
effect of interventionprogrruns
to the knowledge, attitudes, skills and practices ofsmoking, aJcohol and drug use among Fonn Two
students.
Chapter 7 -
Limitations
7.0 Planning Phase7.0.1 Literature Revie\v.
7.0.2 Study Population
7.0.3 Preparation of Questionnaire 7.1 Data Collection.
7.2
JntelVention programs 7. 3 Data Analysis.
Chapter 8-
Recommendations Chapter 9- ReferencesChapter 10-
Glossary120
120
123 126 126 127
128 129 129 129
129 129
130
130
130
131142
Chapter 11 -Appendixes (i) Questionnaire
(ii) Intervention Module
144 145
List of Tables Page
Table 1.2 The prevalence of smoking in different country. 13 Table 1.3 Drug abuser in Malaysia and Kelantan State,
1997. 25
Table 1.4 The relationship between smoking and drug
abuse. 27
Table 3.0 Name of school, number of classes and students. 42 Table 3.4 Items of questionnaire concerning knowledge,
attitudes, skjlJs and practices in relation to
·tobacco use, alcohol and drug use. 44 Table 3.5 Number of variables and maxitnum score
tested in the questionnaire. 56
Table 4.1 Distribution of students by schools and groups. 58 Table 4.2 Distribution of students
by
sex and race. 59 Table 4.3 Pre-intervention mean score andp
value ofknowledge, attitudes, skills and practices of tobacco use, alcohol and drug use for both
groups. 60
Table 4.3.1 Comparing mean score, category and p value of knowledge, attitudes, skills and practices of smoking among both groups before
intervention. 61
Table 4.3.2 Comparing n1ean score, category and p value of knowledge, attitudes, skills and practices of a1coho1 and drug use among both groups
before intervention. 62
Table 4.4 Differences betv;een pre- and post-interVention mean score in each group of the school in relation to knowledge, attitudes, skills and
practices of smoking. 63
Table 4.5 Differences between pre- and post-intervention mean score in each group of the school in relation to k.no,vledge, attitudes, skills and
practices of alcohol and drug use. 64 Table 4.6 Summary ofp value for pre- and post-intervention
mean difference of score and 95°/o confidence
interval in each group of the school. 65 Table 4.7 Summary of scoring categories in relation with
intervention programs and p value of intervention
schools. 66
Table 4.8A1 Percentage of students \vho thinks that smoking
may cause lung cancer. 67
Table 4.8A2
Percentage of students who thinks that passive stnokers who are asthtnatic 1nay get asthmaticattack. 68
Table 4.8A3 Frequency of students vvho thinks there are
~'ays to stop smoking.
69
Table 4.8A4 Frequency of students regarding smoking in
Islam.
70
Table 4.8B Frequency of students ~'ho thinks that smoking
may initiate drug use. 71
Table 4.8CI Frequency of students \vho tried smoking. 72 Table 4.8C2 Frequency of student's time \vhen they start
smoking. 73
Table 4.8C2(a) Frequency of smokers with thne when they start
.
smoking. 74
Table 4.8C3 Frequency of students with number of cigarette
they s1noke everyday. 74
Table 4.8C3(a) Frequency of smokers vvith nwnber of cigarette
everyday. 75
Table 4.8C4 Frequency of student's time when they stop
smoking. 75
Table 4.8C4(a) Frequency of smokers' time when they stop
smoking.
76
Table 4.8C5 Frequency of students with reasons for stop
s1noking. 76
Table 4.8C5(a) Frequency of smokers with reasons for stop
smoking.
77
Table 4.8D1 Frequency of students vvho think alcohol use
may cause liver disease. 78
Table 4.8D2 Frequency of students \vho think alcohol use
may cause motor vehicle accident. 79 Table 4.8D3 Frequency of students who think that we can
stop taking alcohol. 80
Table 4.8E Frequency of students knowledge regarding 81 alcohol use in Islam.
Table 4.8F1 Frequency of students who think drug use
may cause physical and mental derangement.
82
Table 4.8F2 Frequency of students who think drug addiction may change individual mood and
behaviour. 83
Table 4.8F3 Frequency of students who think it is easy to
stop drug abuse. 84
Table 4.8G Frequency of students knowledge about drug
abuse in Islam. 85
Table 4.8H1 Frequency of students who tried alcohol use. 86 Table 4.8H2 Frequency of students who tried drug use. 87 Table 4.8H3 Frequency of students' time when they start
taking alcohol. 88
Table 4.8H3(a) Frequency of alcohol user time when they
start taking alcohol. 89
Table 4.8H4 Frequency of students time vvhen they start
taking drug. 89
Table 4.8H4(a) Frequency of drug user ti1ne when they start
taking drug. 90
Table 4.8H5 Frequency of students with frequency alcoho~
intake for the past one month.
90
Table 4.8H5(a) Frequency of alcohol user with frequency of
alcohol intake for the past one month. 91 Table 4.8H6 Frequency of students with frequency of drug
intake for the past one month. 91
Table 4.8H6(a) Frequency of drug user with frequency of
drug intake for the past one-month. 92 Table 4.8H7 Frequency of students with period since
they stop taking alcohol.
92
Table 4.8H7(a) Frequency of alcohol user ''rith period
since they stop taking alcohol. 93
Table 4.8H8 Frequency of students with reasons for stop
taking alcohol or drug. 93
Table 4.8H8(a) Frequency of alcohol or drug user vv-ith
reasons for stop taking alcohol or drug.
94 Table 4.8I
Prevalence of smoking, alcoho1 and drug useamong students before intervention. 95
Figure 4.1
Figure 4.2 Figure 4.8Al Figure 4.8A2 Figure 4.8A3 Figure 4.8A4 Figure 4.8B Figure 4.8Cl Figure 4.8C2 Figure 4.8C3 Figure 4.8C4 Figure 4.8C5 Figure 4.8Dl Figure 4.8D2 Figure 4.8D3 Figure 4.8E Figure 4. 8F 1
Figure 4. 8F2
Figure 4.8F3
List of Figures
Distributions of students by schools and groups.
Distribution of students by sex.
Smoking and lung cancer
Passive smoker and asthmatic attack.
Any\vay to stop smoking.
Smoking in Islam.
Stnoking and drug use Tried smoking
Age vvhen start smoking
Number of cigarette smoking per day Duration of titne since stop stnoking Reason for stop smoking.
Alcohol use and liver disease
Alcohol use and motor vehicle accident We can stop taking alcohol
Alcohol use in Islam
Drug use and physical and mental derangement.
Drug addiction and individual1nood and behavior changes.
Anyway to stop drug use.
Page
58
59
67
6869
70 71
72 73 74
75
77
7879
80 81
82
83 84
Figure 4.8G Drug abuse in Islam. 85
Figure.4.8H1 Tried alcohol use. 86
Figure 4. 8H2 Tried drug use.
87
Figure 4.8H3 Duration since start taking alcohol. 88
Figure 4.8H4 Duration since start taking drug. 89
Figure 4. 8H5 Frequency of taking alcohol for the
past one month.
90
Figure 4.8H6 Frequency of taking drug for the past
one tnonth. 91
Figure 4.8H7 Duration since stop taking alcohol.
92
Figure 4.8H8 Reason for stop taking alcohol or drug. 94
ACKJ"JO\\'LEDGEMENT
I \~ish to express tny sincere thanks and appreciation to both my supervisors:
i) Assoc. Prof. (Dr.) Abdul Rahman lsa, Head of Department of Community Medicine, USM
ii) Dr. Shaiful Bahari Ismail, Fatnily Medicine Unit, School of Medical Sciences, USM
My special thanks to all lecturers in Family Medicine Unit especially Dr. Sheikh Mohd. Alnin Sheikh Mubarak, and Prof. Rusli Nordin, Dr. Syed Hateem and Dr. Razlan Musa from Departme~t of Community Medicine, USM for their support and guidance.
My
Special appreciation to Dr. Jusoh A wang Senik final year student M. Med.program of fan1ily medicine for the support and help given during the intervention
~
program as well as Dr. Zahiruddin third year student M. Med. program of community medicine for his guidance on data analysis of the results.
I also wish to thank all the staffs in the Department of Community Medicine and research assistant for the project, especially Tg. Syarmiza Tg. Zahid who has done tremendous work for the success of this project.
My
thank also to Kelantan State Education Department and Principals as well as teachers from Sek. Men. Tanjung Mas, Sek. Men. Panji, Sek. Men. Ketereh and Sek.Men. Pangkal Kalong, Kota Bharu for the help throughout the
study
period. Alsomy
thanks to Agensi Dadah Kebangsaan Kelantan branch especially to Encik Mohd. ZainMohd. Ali for his lecture given to the students and materials for intervention programs, and Kelantan Education Unit, Ministry of Health especially to Puan Rehanah Mohd.
Zain
and
LibrarianUSMCK
forall materials
forintervention
programs.Thank
you also to those who have involved either directly or indirectly in the project.Last but not least,
my
deepest regards tomy family,
bothmy
parents,my
wife, Noriah Hassan,my
two sons, Muhatnmad Hafizzuddin ( 6) and Muhammad Fatih ( 4) and1ny
daughter, Faizatun Nisa' ( 13 month) for their patience, encouragement and understanding that 1nake the study worth while.ABSTRAK
0 B.JF.I(Tl F:
Untuk n1engkaji tahap pengetahuan, sikap. ken1ahiran dan amalan yang
berkaitan dengan penggunaan ten1bakau (merokok), arak dan dadah d1kalangan 1nurid- murid sekolah menengah tingkatan dua di Kota Bharu, Kelantan, dan untuk melihat keberkesanan progra111 intervensi di sekoiah yang menggunakan pelajar sebagai kumpulan penggerak (Briged Kesihatan Sekolah) untuk tnetnbimbing rakan sebaya.
K.-\EDAH:
Kaj ian
intervensi telah d1ja1ankan dika1angan pelajar-pelajar tingkatan duadi
em pat buah seko1ah menengah kerajaan (harian) di Daerah Kota Bharu, Kelantan ..
Kajian ini telah bermula pada bulan Januari 1999 hingga Disember 1999. Seramai 36 orang pelajar dati S1vfK dan 38 orang pelajar dari SMTM telah dipilih untuk menjadi pengajar (Briged Kesihatan Sekolah). Program intervensi dijalankan dengan n1elatih Bri ged Kesihatan Sekolah dan mereka menyarnpaikan program-program tersebut
kepada pelajar-pelajar tingkatan dua vanrr lain di dua buah sekolah selama 3 bulan.
... J : ; ,
Soalan-soalan
kajiselidik kendiri (Bahasa Malaysia) telah diberikan kepada pelajar- pelajar dietnpat
buah sekolah tersebut sebelutn (pre) pada April 1999 dan selepas (post)progra111
intervensi pada Oktober 199Q.KEPlJTllSAN:
i) Data Demografi
Seramai
707orang pelajar telah mengambil bahagian
dalamkajian
ini, dimana 392 (55.5%) pel ajar adalah dari kumpulan intervensi dan 3}5 ( 44.5~/o) pelajar dari kun1pulan kawalan. Daripada keseluruhan pelajar, 388 (54.9o/o) adalah pelajar lelakidan 319
(45.1%)pelajar perempuan. Kesemua pelajar adalah Melayu yang beragama Islam.
ii) Penggunaan tembakau (rokok) dikalangan pelajar
Seramai 150 (2 1 .2°/o) pelajar pemah cuba merokok dan 139 (19. 7%) pelajar telah menjadi perokok.
iii) Penggunaan arak dan dadab dikalangan pelajar
Seratnai 28 (4%) pelajar pernah meminum arak dan 20 (2.9o/o) pelajar telah menjadi penagih arak. Seramai 22 (3.1 %) pelajar pemah mencuba dadah dan 11
(
1.6~'<>)pel ajar telah menagih dadah.
iv) Kesan program intervensi terhadap tahap pengetahuan, siknp, ken1cthiran dan amalnn pcngambilan tcmbakau (merokok)
Selepas program intervensi terdapat peningkatan kt!tara pada nilai pcrtengahan pencapaian ( skor) dan nilai penengahan perbezaan pencapaian untuk pengetahuan tentang penggunaan ten1bakau dengan n1lai p<O.OO l.Bagain1ana pun tiada perbezaan yang ketara pada sikap, keJnahiran dan amalan pengambilan te1nbakau.
v) Kesan program intervensi terhadap tahap pengetahuan, sikap, kemahiran dan amalan pengambilan arak dan dadah
Selepas program intervensi terdapat peningkatan ketara pada nilai pertengahan pencapaian (skor) dan nilai pertengahan perbezaan pencapaian untuk, pengetahuan, sikap terhadap pengambilan arak dan dadah, dan amalan pengambilan arak dan dadah dengan nilai p<0.05. Bagaimana pun tiada perbezaan ketara pada ketnahiran untuk mencegah dari pengambilan arak dan dadah.
I<ESThiPULA:"i:
Progratn-program intervenst yang diberikan o\eh Briged Kesihatan Seko\ah di
dua buah sekolah(kU1npulan
intervensi) selama 3 bulan telah dapat m~ningkatkan p~ngetahuan pel ajar ten tang pengatnbilan tctnbakau ( tn~rokok) tetapi tidak dapat 1nen1perbaiki sikap, kc1nahiran dan amalan mereka. Juga progra111 terscbut relah dapattneningkatkan pengetahuan pel ajar tentang pengambilan arak dan dadah, 1netnperbaiki sikap tnereka terhadap pengatnbilan arak dan dadah tetapi tidak untuk kemahiran mencegahnya. Tambahan pula ia telah dapat m~mperbaiki amalan pelajar akan
pengambilan arak dan dadah.
XlV
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVES:
To assess the knowledge, attitudes, skills and practices in relation to tobacco use, alcohol and drug use among Form Two students in four secondary school in Kota Bharu, Kelantan and to assess the effectiveness of school intervention programs that use students as a peer group to educate their colleague.
METHODOLOGY:
An intervention study
wascarried out among Form Two students in four secondary school (daily type) in Kota Bharu, Kelantan. The study was started in January 1999 till December 2000. Thirty-six students in S:MK and thirty-eight students in SMTM were selected to be the teachers (SHB). The intervention programs were done mainly by these trained SHB who disseminated the programs to other Form Two students in two schools over a 3 months period. Self-administered questionnaire (Bahasa Malaysia) were given to the students in four schools before (pre) on April1999 and after (post) intervention
programs on October 1999.
XV
RESULTS:
i) Demographic data
There were 707 students who participated in this study in
which392
(55.5%)students in the intervention group
and315
(44.5%)students in the control group.
388 (54.9%)of the students were males and
319 (45.1%)were females.
Allthe students were Malays Muslim.
ii) · Tobacco use (smoking) among students
.
There were about 150
(21.2%)students who had tried smoking and 139 ( 19. 7°/o) students
whowere regular smoker.
iii) Alcohol and drug use among students
There were
28 (4%)students
whohad
triedalcohol and 20 (2.9°/o)
students were alcohol abusers.
Therewere
22 (3 .1%)students who had tried drug
use and 11 (1.6%) students were drug abusers.
XVI
iv) The effect of intervention programs on the KASP of tobacco use
After intervention programs there was significant increased in mean score and mean difference of score for knowledge of tobacco· use
\\rith pvalue
<0. 001.
However there were no significant difference seen in attitudes, skills and practices of tobacco use.
v) The effect of intervention programs on the KASP of alcohol and drug use
After intervention programs there were significant increased in mean score and mean difference of score for knowledge, attitudes towards alcohol and
druguse, and practices and of alcohol and drug use
withp value <0.05. However there were no significant difference seen
inskills against alcohol
anddrug use.
CONCLUSION:
. Intervention programs given by SHB in
twoschool
within3 months
periodcan increase the knowledge of tobacco use but unable to change their attitudes, skills and
,practices. Also it can increase their knowledge of alcohol and drug uses, improved their attitudes towards alcohol and drug use but not for skills against it. Futhennore it
improved their practices of alcohol and drug use.
A bbrcviations
AIDS ADK CDC HIV
MMA
MOH
NADI PBSS
PMR
SHB SMK SMP SMPK SMTM SPSS U.K.
U.S.A U.S.M.
USMCK WHO
Acquired lmmune Deficiency Syndrome Agensi Dadah Kebangsaan
Centre for Disease Control Human lmmunodificiency Virus
K.nowl~unc ~ ~ At\in~g~~, S~j))s af)d Practices
Ministry of Health
National Drug Information System .Program Bersepadu Sekolah Sihat
Peperiksaan Menengah Rendab School Health Brigade
Sekolah Menengah Ketereh Sekolah Menengah Panji
Sekolah Menengah Pangkal Kalong Sekolah Menengah Tanjung Mas Statistical Package for Social Sciences United Kingdom
United States of America Universiti Sains Malaysia
Universiti Sains Malaysia Cawangan Kelantan Wor\d Health Organization
CHAPTER!:
'(
INTRODUCTION
1
Th"TRODUCTION
1.1 Adolescents Health Issues
The WHO Technical Report Series 886 ( 1999) on Programming for Adolescent Health and Development states that adolescent health no longer requires justification. More than half the world's population is below 25, with four out of five young people living in developing countries.
Changing conditions are bringing about changes in behaviour, and countries have recognized that behaviour formed in the second decade of life has lasting implications for individual and public health. The multiplicity of health problems associated with specific types of behaviour include problems associated with the use of tobacco, alcohol and otper substances that impair judgement and increase the risk of cancers, cardiovascular and respiratory diseases.
Health-enhancing behavior is primarily the responsibility of young people themselves, who must increasingly take and effect decisions with major health consequences for the present and future. Young people often have little understanding of their own maturation,
are unprepared for new relationships, and are unaware of
healthservices available
to them.Young people who have developed personal competence, social maturity, and a sense of identity and self-esteem are much more likely to make decisions, which will positively affect their health and development.
2
The second decade of life is a period of rapid growth and personal development without which individuals cannot acquire the competence needed to adapt to a diverse and changing world. Generally, competence develops whenever there are opportunities to practice certain skills
by
understanding and using social conventions. The ability to solve problems and anticipate the outcome of one's choices helps to Cieveiop a positive sense of self-efficacy and self-worth.One feature of modern society is the rapidity with which people, ideas and images move across cultures, including the rural to urban transition. This can threaten adult's value systems, authority and knowledge. Yet, such increase in communication provides access to information
and
ideas that can be value. Meanwhile,the shift
of economic control from the public to private sector accentuates a competitive rather than cooperative model of society, and this may also threaten traditional values. Global communication also changes aspirations, andmany
yoWlg people are disadvantaged by the increasing gaps between the rich and poor of North and South andwithin
countries. This situation is aggravated by rapid population growth in countries least equipped to meet the new challenges.There are health problems which need to be dealt with differently
in
adolescents than in adults and children- clearly, the traditional approach to preventing and managing thehealth problems of adults is not always
effective indealing with
thoseof
adolescents.Early education programs for the prevention of smoking sought to infonn about the long-tenn health problems of smoking. The programs often used scare tactics; futilely
3
relying on the theory that fear of consequences would deter adolescents from smoking.
More successful programs now focus on the development needs of adolescents. They emphasize the short-tenn physical and social consequences of smoking (such as the disagreable odour on clothes and on the breath, stains on the fingers and teeth, and
'
reduced exercise and sports performance). In addition, they prepare adolescents to resist social and peer pressure by bel ping them strengthen their skills.
Adolescent health, like adolescent development, is a positive concept.
It
comprises physical, mental and social well being and not merely the absence of disease orinfirmity
(WHO Constitution) and, like development, it is closely related to adolescent behaviour.However, many diseases and injuries are the resu1t of an unsafe environment beyond the control of the adolescent. Health issues related to the young person's own behaviour include: the age at which sexual activity is initiated, and whether protection is used~
eating habits; level of physical activity; and use of tobacco, alcohol and .. other psychoactive substances. Evidence shows that the health problems of adolescents are interrelated. That is because the factors, which determine their health behavior,
are
also interrelated. Adolescents who have had the safety, support and opportunity to develop their physical, psychological, social, moral, spiritual, artistic or vocational potential are more likely to have the self-esteem, knowledge and skills to be healthy, and to behave inways that avert life- or health-threatening
problems.Most programs designed to 'prevent' a specific problem do so primarily by promoting competencies that are at the heart of adolescent develop1nent. Moreover, many programs are beginning to employ strategies to modify the sociaJ environment of adolescents,
\/
\..'
4
reCObl'T11zing the inherent risk and protective factors in the environn1ent. The process of development involves the changing relations benveen the adolescent and his or her context. Healthy develop1nent requires the meeting of basic needs and also the acquisition of the co1npetencies necessary to negotiate the social environment and take on adult roles.
Programming that focuses on helping adolescents meet their basic personal needs and master by competencies for living strengthen their overall development and resilience, and ultimately contributes to the motivation and skills needed, to make choices that enhance health. Adolescents with self-esteem, who have mastered essential skills, are better prepared to exploit educational, vocational and social opportunities, or to cope better than others with the lack of such opportunities.
The concept that certain problems have common causes has been validated by findings in a recent study in Cape Town, South Africa, showing that risky types of behaviour
/
involving sexuality, smoking, alcohol and drug use, and suicide are strongly related. }\n extensive study of American adolescents concludes that love; understanding and parental attention help adolescents to avoid high risk activities both in one-parent and two-parent households. At school positive relationship with teachers were found to be more Important in protecting adolescents then any other factor, including classroom size or the amount of training a teacher has (WHO: 1999).
The overall aim of adolescent programs must be to produce well-informed"' skilled young people who are motivated to make healthy choices., through an environment that encourages and facilitates these choices, and provides key services., opponunities~ and
5
interpersonal support. The information young people need and are entitled to be part of a safe and supportive environment for them.
• Adolescents require basic infonnation about growth and development and the changes experienced physically, psychologically (both emotionally and cognitively), and socially during maturation.
• Adolescence represents an important opportunity to share and explore information about the needs (both shared and sex-specific) that males and fetnale experience, and about the roles each sex plays in relationships, family life and society.
• Adolescents require information about specific areas of health, such as nutritional requirements etc.
• Adolescents require information about potential risks to their health from behaviour such as use of tobacco, abuse of alcohol and other drugs, and on how to avert these risks.
• Adolescents also need information about opportunities and available services related to health, education and vocational and recreational opportunities, to optimize the use of resources available to them.
The information should be interactive, active in approach, urr~~~u iu a 'voiuntary' as opposed to a 'captive' audience tailored to the needs of individual adolescents and reaches a large number of people.
Peer to peer education
has
been found to be effective approach to sharing information.Young people are often willing to listen to and follow advice from their peers. Researches indicate that peer-led education is at least as successful as adult-led education in health
6
risk reduction programs on matters such as drug abuse, prevention of pregnancy and HIV.
Young people stating support for and modeling important prevention behaviour (such as thinking about personal choices by avoiding abuse of alcohol) have been found to help create and strengthen positive attitude in-groups towards the healthy behaviour. As role models, peers can be very effective in enhancing information sharing as an intervention.
The intervention of building skills is the process of teaching competencies to influence behaviour
through
a set of structured activities. Teaching of skills is practical and intended to equip the young people with new or improved abilities in selected areas.Young people need to develop competencies and particular skills in physical, psychological, social, moral and vocational areas, to promote healthy development and help prevent particular health problems. Skills that are needed for performing various specifics task in everyday life and include:
- practical self-care skills - livelihood skills
- skills for dealing with specific risky situations, such as the ability to say 'no' while under peer pressure to use drugs.
The activities used to build skills include working in small groups and pa1rs, brainstorming, rehearsal, role-playing, games and debates. To teach a new skills, it is
useful to
introducethe behaviour or
ski11 andprovide information on its
use~demonstrate
the skill, give participants an opportunity to try it out, ask for self-assessment of performance (and of ways to improve it), provide feed-back, and then provide the opportunity to try out the skill again. It has been found most effective to give the7
feedback in a constructive, supportive tnanner. This in itself is an important skill that adolescents and adults to learn. If the technique of role-playing is used, for example to learn skills for avoiding risky situations, it is often useful to introduce progressively complex situations to which the young person must respond, thereby practising the selected skills.
A review of some research on life skills programming noted:
- positive changes in self-reporting of health behaviour (for example substance abuse and smoking) following the programs;
- those based upon skill learning worked better than traditional approaches based
upon
information provision;- improvements in mental health status, in particular self -esteem and self-confidence;
- improved relations, and more open communication with parents~
- evidence of teacher satisfaction, improved teacher-pupil relations and classroom behaviour, following training and implementation of a program on skills.
A review (J Howard unpublished data, 1995) of the effectiveness of interventions to reduce substance abuse identified training
in
skills along with cognitive behaviourand
residential treatments,as
having positive outcomesin
the few controlled trials available.Training in skills has also been cited as important in reducing alcohol consumption
among adolescents in both the short and
long tenns.A review of the effectiveness of tobacco, alcohol and drug abuse programs for young people noted the importance of teaching young people skills to help them resist identified
8
pressure in the media and correcting misconceptions of social nonns governing drug use.
Also highlighted was the importance of teaching adolescents general skills to prevent drug use. These typically include two or more of the following types of training in skills:
problem solving and decision-making, cognitive skills for resisting negative social influences, skills for increasing self-control and self-esteem, coping strategies for relieving stress and anxiety, interpersonal and assertiveness skills. Such approaches have reportedly shown some success in relation to both alcohol and marijuana use.
Intervention plays a dual role in promoting healthy development and reducing high- risk behaviour. Designing programmes, which involve a combination of interventions suited to the particular, needs of the young people served can enhance this dual benefit.
Various studies have confirmed that the factors related to antisocial behaviour in late adolescence and adulthood are found in childhood and early adolescence - the absence of a competent or caring adult, early educational difficulties and unaddressed learning
difficulties, among others -
are
directly related to unprotected sexual activity, delinquency, drug abuse and other antisocial and self-destructive behaviour. In addition, evidence frommany
developing countries suggests that adolescents are dropping out of school as early as age 10. Thus, empirical demographic trends as well as research from developmental psychology suggest that investing in problem prevention for vulnerableadolescents
shouldstart
atan
early age.It
isimportant to encourage the development of
desired behaviour at crucial stages of adolescence before undesirable behaviour becomes habits.
9
Adolescence is a time in which various developmental tasks must be completed. The consolidation of identity, reduced dependence on parents, establishment of intimate relationships outside the immediate family and selection of a vocation are major tasks of adolescence.
The focus of interventions can be seen as two-fold:
• Interventions are required which focus on the individual: intervention, such as providing information and building skills, and counseling may be offered in-group of varying sizes or on an individual basis, but the main focus of each intervention is on influencing the development and behavioural choices of adolescents as individuals.
• Interventions are also required which address selected external factors in the adolescents social environment: (a) existing or non-existent policies and legislation, such as laws on smoking and school attendance of pregnant adolescents; (b) the social norms prevailing in a society, such as attitudes towards the general role of adolescents, and towards sexual activity of young people; and (c) the presence of caring and supportive family, friends and other adults.
A safe and supportive environment is part of what motivates young people to make healthy choices. 'Safe' in this context refers to absence of trauma, excessive stress, violence (or fear of violence) or abuse. 'Supportive' means an environment that provides a positive, close relationship with family, other adults (including teachers and youth and religious leaders) and peers. Such relationships can nurture and guide young people, set limits when needed, and challenge certain assumptions and beliefs supportive and caring
10
relationships with adults and friends, and positive school experiences are particularly significant aspects of a supportive environment for adolescents. Such relationships provide specific support in making individual behaviour choices, such as when to become sexually active, how to handle anger, what to eat, and when and if to use substances.
Adolescent is a gateway to the promotion of health.
Many
of the behavioural patterns acquired during adolescence (such as gender relations, sexual conduct, the use of tobacco, alcohol and other drugs, eating habit, and dealing with conflicts and risks) will last a lifetime. They will affect the health and well being of future generations. Adolescence provides opportunities to prevent the onset of health-damaging behaviour and potential repercussions. Fortunately, adolescents are receptive to· new ideas; they are keen to make the most of their growing capacity for making decisions. Their curiosity and interest are tremendous opening to foster personal responsibility for health. Furthermore, engaging in positive and constructive activities provides occasions to forge relationships with' adults and peers as well as to acquire behaviour that is crucial to health.The attitudes and behaviour programs seek to influence (e.g. sexual behaviour and gender relations, use of substance, dealing with conflicts and risks) often arise from and feed off one another. For example, the use of psychoactive substances alters judgement and thus makes aggressive acts, unprotected sex and accidents more likely (WHO, 1999).
l l
1.2 Adolescents and Smoking
ft is no longer a doubt that smoking is hazardous to health. Tobacco consumption is the fonn of cigarene smoking is a serious public health problem in Malaysia. The most important cause of preventable premature death in this country is related to smoking for the past decade, heart diseases. cerebrovascular diseases and cancers remain the leading causes of death (MOH., Malaysi~ 1996). Smoking ·is a major problem amongst youth in Malaysia. A survey by the Ministry of Youth and Sports on negative behaviors among 5 860 adolescents showed that 80% of them smoked (N N Naing et al, 1997).
Cigarette smoking has gradually been accepted as part of 'modern culture'. Small- scale community studies and the 1987 nationwide survey conducted by the Ministry of Health have reponed a smoking prevalence of 40 to 50 per cent. Studies among university students in the 1970's have found a smoking prevalence of about 25 per cent (B Hashami et al, 1994). The National Health and Morbidity Survey·l996 conducted by Ministry of Health have reported a smoking prevalence of 31.3 per cent. By age group 18 to 19 years old smoking prevalence of 22.5 per cent. In Kelantan State the prevalence of smoking among adult's age> 18 years old was 38.3 percent. There are also a studies that shown the prevalence of smolGng was 26.6 per cent among students in Malaysia and 18.8 per cent among students in Australia (average 23.4 ~/o) (B Hashami et al, 1994).
Z Ahmad ( 1999) in his preliminary report was mention nearly half of the students \~·ho
smoke started smoking while are stilJ in the primary school ( 48.6o/o). For non-smokers~
only 31 students (1.3~'o) are keen to start smoking when they become adults. The majority
of the students (51.0°,'0) have fathers who are s1nokers. Nearly 30~-o of the students have elder brothers \vho are smokers. Ho\vever, only a s1naJ1 nUtnber 106 ( 12.Q~Io) have got close friends \vho are smokers. The 1najority of students 921 ( 52.3~/o) occasionally asked to buy cigarettes for their fathers while their fathers frequently ask 128 (7.4°/o) students buy cigarette. In other studies have shovm that most of the smokers (69.6~lo) started the habit during secondary school. How·ever~ 31.8% of them started even during their primary school. Tvvo common reasons given for s1noking are peer influence and personal problems. Twenty-five (54.3%) admitted to smoke 1-5 cigarettes per
day
while 10 (21.7%) smoked more than 20. Almost all of them (93.5°/o) knew that smoking is dangerous to their health (N N Naing et al, 1997).In
another study have shows that around two third of the smokers started the smoking habit before the age of 15. Reasons for smoking weremainly
imitation, enjoyment, rela.~ation at free time, feeling of 1naturation and normal behaviour of man (N N Naing et al, 1996). We now know that the period between the ages of 9 and 10 has been identified as a time when children experiment with their first cigarette. Curiosity, and the fact that others are trying smoking, plays an important role in this early experimentation. The cigarette isusually
obtained from another person and smoked in the company of others. However, most experimentation with smoking occurs in late childhood and early adolescence. Studies confirm that it reaches a peak betvleen the ages of 11 and 14, and half of all children who experiment with smokino before thev are sixteen do so in their first three vears of~ - J
secondary school (B Bellew, Dwayne, 1991 ).
The prevalence of smoking among children and adolescents has been studied in many countries. Most studies from Britain have shown that at the age of 16 years 25°-'o of
13
British boys admit to being regular smokers (Hom et al, 1959~ Bough et al, 1982). Fro1n among countries neighboring the UAE, in Saudi Arabia the smoking prevalence \vas 7. 8~'o and 37~·o among high school children (Rowland and Shipstar~ Bener 1987), in Kuwait 30~'o (Moody et al, 1996)~ and in Jordan 17°/o (Avvidi., 1990). In Japan the corresponding figure was 37~'o (Oga\va et al, 1988), in Greece 22.3~/o (Kokkevi, 1991 ), in
·' Ireland 16-2lo/o (Borehan, 1993), and in Australia 28~1o (Levy, 1991) (A Bener, L M B .AJ-Ketbi., 1999) (see Table 1.2). In Hong Kong, China and other Asian countries., the rise in the prevalence of smoking in adults is a more recent phenomenon then in the lJK and
US.
Although the risein
smoking in children occurred later, current prevalence is now approaching that in the West (T H Lam et al, 1998).Table 1.2: The prevalence of smoking in different countries
I I l Prevalence teenage 1
I
I
! i
Country Age of population boys I
I Author & year I l
i !
I
I Australia Levy, 1986 14-19 28 ~I
China Zhu et al, 1988 15-18 14-23'
!
I
Greece Kokkevi, 1991 14-18..,.., ...
.., ~I
Japan Ogawa et al, 19 88 12-15 23-29I
Jordan Awidi, 1991 16 16.7I
Saudi Arabia Rowlands et al, 1987 18-19 12
ILTK
Charlton, 1983 1626
i
I
USA Portnov, 1989I
Tenth grade 21
I
I
UAE Bener et al, 1999 15--19 19Source: A Bener and LMB Al-Ketbi ( 1999)
14
Recent evidence has shown that cigarette smoking and its 1najor health proble1ns are no longer confined to adults. Although minors suffer primarily from passive smoking due to parental smoke, children of parents who stnoke are also influences to begin smoking early. Apart from the role of parents, minors also smoke as results of the lack of national, strategies to prevent children from smoking. A paper in this issue cf the Medical Journal of Malaysia has shown that our children can easily purchase cigarettes without being asked their age or for whom the cigarettes are. Yet another factor is the aggressive tnarketing strategies employed by cigarette companies. Dwindling sales in developed countries have resulted in these companies divening their resources and attention to
developing countries. As these countries have populations with large numbers of children
.
and adolescents, marketing strategies are deliberately targeted at the younger age groups.
Cigarette advertisements in developing countries therefore use themes and role models that would markedly appeal to adolescents and children. Cigarette companies also sponsor programs that appeal to younger age groups like sports, music, travel and other recreational activities. The psychological effect of this in children is the conditioning of their minds and the formation of an associations between smoking and these 'acceptable' activities while this does not automatically make children take up the habit, it nevertheless create some degree of permissiveness in their minds towards smoking. Other factors also play a part in determining smoking behavior in children. Recent studies have shovm these factors to be cultural, peer pressure and psychobiological (H M Hussain, 1998).
Earlier initiation of smoking is associated \vith developing heavier use and earlier onset of related illnesses. Tobacco smoking is addictive~ therefore these young smokers
15
fonn a cohort of future chronic users \vho are at risk for numerous diseases. Tobacco products have been readily available to young people. Flay BR ( 1993) has noted that the!
social learning process of young people is affected when they observe how easy it is to obtain tobacco (R A Dovell et at 1998). Pierce and Gilpin estimate that teenagers \Vho become smokers today will remain addicted for an average of 1
o
to :20 years. In addition,adolescent smoking is a dynamic process, \vith many experimenting but fewer going on to regular use. Mental Health might influence the process of becoming a smoker at
various points: initiation of smoking, transition
to
regular use and the process of quitting ( G C Patton et al, 1996 ).What is perhaps
most
strikingis
that 7 of 10 young people \vho smoke report that they regret ever having started. Three of four young smokers have tried to quit at least once and failed. The sense of regret and helplessness among teenagers was documented in focus group studies of young smokers sponsored by one Tobacco Company more1than a decade ago. A report on one of those studies noted:However intriguing smoking was at 11, 12 or 13, by the age of 16 or 17 may regretted their use of cigarettes for health reasons and because they feel unable to stop smoking when they want to. Over half claim they want to quit. However, they cannot quit easier than adult can .
. 1\ subsequent report on youth smoking for the company stated:
The desire to quit seems to come earlier now than before, even prior to the end of high school. Infact, it often seems to take hold as soon as the recent starter admits to him that he is hooked by stnoking. However the desire to quit and actually carrying it out., are two
16
quite different things, as they would be quitters soon learns. Young people are aware of the dangers associated with smoking and nicotine addiction~ but they do not believe that these dangers apply to them. Until they are in the grip of nicotine addiction, they greatly underestimate its power over them (D A Kessler, 1995).
Nicotine meets the key criteria for addiction or dependence used by major medical organizations. The market place for tobacco products is sustained by this addiction. The 1988 Surgeon General's report concluded 'cigarettes and other fonns of tobacco are addicting ... [and] nicotine is the drug in tobacco that causes addiction'. The Surgeon General's conclusion drew on criteria for addiction or dependence used by U.S. and international medical organizations, including the following:
Compulsive use (despite a desire, or repeated attempts to quit), psychoactive effects produced by the action of the substance on the brain and behavior motivated by the 'reinforcing' effects of the psychoactive substance (D A Kessler, 1995).
Given the high level of awareness about the dangers of tobacco, why are teenagers smoking in ever-greater numbers? Many cite tobacco advertising as major contributor to this increase. The amount being spent by this industry in the United States has more than doubled in a 1 0-year period~ rising to 4-6 billion dollars in recent years. As a result~
young people see tobacco advertising messages everywhere: on bill boards, in stores, in magazines, on clothing and at community events. These ubiquitous images and messages serve as a symbolic social influences by conveying to young people that tobacco use is
des1rab1e~ socially acceptable., safe, healthy and prevalent in society (E Feighery et al~
1998).
17
'v\lith regard to the transition from non-smoker to experimental smoker, they cite longitudinal studies which have identified predictors such as social disadvantage: a social milieu that mode] smoking~ availability or affordability of cigarettes~ a personalities that is rebellions, risk taking and independent, with fragile self-esteem: relatively weak refusal skills~ exaggerated beliefs about the prevalence of smo~ing; non scholastic orientation;
attitudes and intentions favorable to smoking and a favorable subjective response to cigarette advertising. Studies concern]ng the transition from experimental to regular stnoker have identified predictors such as modeling and approval by peer group, an independent, risk-taking personality; exaggerated prevalence estimates; and attitudes and intentions favorable to smoking. There is also evidence that nicotine addiction and beliefs about the value of smoking to control weight are relevant factors (B Belle\v, D Wayne, 1991).
Goddard E (1990), in her longitudinal study of school children in England and~ Wales has concluded that the onset of smoking among young teenagers is rarely a single distinct event with a simple explanation; on the contrary, the smoking behavior of children is erratic and complex (B Bellew, DWayne, 1991).
Unfonunately, cigarette smoking is common among young people, including preadolescents, and up to 75% of adolescent's experiments with cigarettes at least once.
During the past two decades, the age at which adolescents begin smoking has decreased, particularly a1nong girls, with some reports showing that children as young as 9 years old are smoking. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention have reported that 91 o,'Q of adult·s smokers began smoking before the age of20~ however, the peak ages for
18
experimenting with tobacco vary by study. In a study of children in military households, Chisick et al. reported that most smokers began using cigarettes between the ages of 9 and 14. By contrast, Esconbedo et
al.
found 17 to 19 years of age to be the peak years of smoking initiation across all racial and ethnic groups. Laws banning the sale of cigarettes to minors have been beneficial in reducing smoking initiation; however, nearly 75% of juniors and seniors in high school who smoke obtain cigarettes from family members or· friends. Parents appear to strongly influence whether their children will begin smoking.
Peer pressure appears to play an important role in smoking initiation. Group membership dramatically influences whether an adolescent will use tobacco and social pressures for popularity continue to induce smoking behavior among teenagers, particularly before the age of 16 (J S Hampl, N M Betts, 1999).
The evidence that tobacco was harmful began to accumulate during the 19th century, much of it relating to cancer and the use of clay pipes. As the incidence of lung ~cancer among men began to rise in the frrst decades of the 20th century, several epidemiological (case-control) studies were carried out in Britain,
Germany
and the USA to explore the reasons for the observed increase. For various reasons, these studies failed to establish unequivocally the role of tobacco in producing lung cancer. The situation changed dramatically in 1950 with the publication of five major case-control studies (four carried out in the USA (Schrek et al., Levin et al., Wills and Porter, and Wynber and Graham and one in the United Kingdom (Doll and Hill), all of which revealed a close association between smoking and lung cancer (AD Lopez, 1999).19
The study found that there \vas an estimated 16~'o increased risk of lung cancer among non-smoking spouses of smokers. For place exposure, the estimated increase in risk was 1 7°/o. The results of this study are consistent with those fro1n 111ajor scientific reviews of this question published during 1997 and 1998 by the Government of Australia, the State of California and the Government of United Kingdom. A major meta-analysis of passive smoking and lung cancer has also been published in the British medical journal. From these and other previous reviews of the scientific evidence a clear global scientific consensus has emerged: passive smoking does cause lung cancer and other diseases (World Health Forum, 1998).
The epidemic of addiction to nicotine among young people has enormous consequences for public health. Each year in the United States, more than 400,000 smoker's die of smoking related illnesses. Smoking kills more people than AIDS, car accidents, alcohol, homicides, illegal drugs, suicides and fires combined. Diseases associated with smoking include heart disease, lung cancer, chronic bronchitis and emphysema (D A Kessler, 1995).
The challenge remains, however to accelerate public health action to reduce cigarette consumption everywhere, particularly in the developing world. l\s the evidence on the hazards of tobacco confirms to accumulate in developing countries, the need for more effective tobacco control programs will become increasingly urgent. If appropriate
policy
and program responses are not implemented today, the prediction of 10 million deaths a year from tobacco consumption worldwide by 2030 wi11 tragically become a reahty (AD
Lopez, 1999).
20
1.3 Adolescents Alcohol and Drug Use Issues
Alcohol related problems are a matter for concern in
many
countries. Besides producing psychiatric and physical complications for the alcohol dependent person, alcohol abuse also causes grave difficulties for his family,as
well as causing social problems such as motor vehicle accidents, absenteeism from work and increased cost of health care (T Maniam, 1994 ). The overall effect of alcohol consumption in a population depends on the distribution within it of conswnption and the prevalenceof
diseases the frequencies of which are modified by alcohol. A study in the USA suggested that the reduction of mortality attributable to the beneficial effects of alcohol might slightly outweigh the excess mortality attributable to the harmful effects. Even if a net excess ofmortality
is attributable to alcohol, this is less than the mortality attributable to smoking.The net effect of drinking on years of life lost (as opposed to death rates) may be less favourable because the causes of death prevented by alcohol occur mostly irt older individuals, whereas accidents and suicide (the risks of which are increased by alcohol) are important causes of death in young adults ( C May, 1991 ). The actual prevalence of alcoholism and alcohol-related disorders in Malaysian community is unknown, since there have been no studies done to estimate this. However, the Consumer Association of Malaysia estimates there to be 200,000 alcoholics in this country, of which 65% are Indian, 25% is Chinese and 9% are Malays. In 1988, the Consumers Bulletin reported the total of 80 deaths from drinking adulterated alcohol in the last 11
years
(K I Saroja, 0 Kyaw, 1993). The 1996 National Health and Morbidity Survey conducted by Ministry of21
Health has reported alcohol prevalence among non-Muslim (age >18 years old) was 29.2 percent and or Kelantan State was 3 3. 7 percent.
Alcohol has two entirely different effects on brain. One is an anxiolytic (anxiety relieving) or tranquilizing effect, the other a stimulatory effect. People who tend to worry unnecessarily under normal circumstances and who become even more anxious when faced with demanding situations, for example public appearances often exploit the anxiolytic or tranquilizing effects of alcohol. The relief offered in these situations
by
the anxiolytic effects of alcohol may lead to habitual drinking, with an increasing need for larger quantities of alcohol. In a relatively short time, these people are unable to cope without alcohol - they have become alcoholics. This dependence on alcohol can affect anyone, even athletes. Recent research has shown that alcohol stimulates certain brain functions. It helps a person to relax and promotes a feeling of well being (euphoria), which is probably the most potent reason for social drinking. Even at low ·blood concentrations, alcohol impairs co-ordination and prolongs reaction times, whichobviously
diminishes athletic performance. Symptoms also include memory disturbances.The deterioration in performance exists long before other indications of intoxication become apparent and has led to the introduction of legal limits for drunken driving in many countries (limits vary). Important signs are already evident at the low blood alcohol level corresponding to the consumption of one to two bottles of strong beer (9715(b) Res
16).
22
Alcohol use is an excellent example of a biopsychosocia11y-detennined condition, the cause of which is multidimensional and multifactorial. Studies have explored personality, demographic, psychological, familial and environmental characteristics associated 'With adolescent alcohol use. Ongoing research supports the following antecedents of adolescent alcohol use: laws and norms favorable toward use; the availability of alcohol;
extreme economic deprivation; neighborhood disorganization; and low bonding to traditional social support groups, such as religious groups, clubs and youth activity organizations. Children and adolescents who experience considerable problems in behavior (such as aggressiveness and rebellious deviancy), in cognition (such as learning disabilities and attention deficit disorders), in psychological well-being (such as
depressio~ isolation and low self-esteem) and in family functioning (such as neglect, abuse, loss and lack of close relationships) have been shown to be at increased risk. Early onset of alcohol use is one of the best predictors of subsequent use (M J Werner et al, 1999).
The structure of the family itself continued to changed in most
parts
of the worlcL generally becoming more nuclear and thereby weakening traditional patterns of social solidarity and support. Just one of the factors involved has been the increasing number of\Vomen in developing countries entering the paid labor force for economic reasons.
Family breakdown and other changes in family structure have had repercussions on the health of individual family members and of the family as a whole as well as on the health and social services, which have often not been able to respond to increased demands. It has also had an impact on behavior especially that of young people and particularly in the
23
area of sexual relations and the use of tobacco, alcohol and other drugs with important short- and long-term consequences for health (WHO, Geneva, 1994). Parents serve as important role models for their children. Attitudes and beliefs regarding alcohol develop early in life, often by age 7 or 8 years. Parents need to be aware that their attitudes and beliefs can strongly influence and play a major role in shaping their child's behavior.
Clear parent-defmed conduct norms are an important protective factor. Adolescents least likely to use alcohol and other drugs are emotionally close to their parents, receive advice and guidance from their parents, have siblings who are intolerant of drug use, and are expected to comply with established conduct rules. The parents of nonusers typically provide praise and encouragement, develop feelings of trust, and are sensitive to their
.
children's emotional needs (M J Werner et al,
1999).
The average age of first drinking alcohol outside of family-sanctioned use or religious occasions is now down to 12 years of age. The earlier an individual begins to drink~or use other drugs, the greater the likelihood of later problems related to alcohol and/or other drugs. Alcohol use is a major factor in the deterioration of the health status of adolescents and young adults. The leading causes of death in teenagers are accidents or unintended injuries, homicide and suicide. Approximately one half of fatal motor vehicle accidents and homicides, as well as a substantial proportion of suicides, are associated with the use of alcohol and other drugs. Postmortem studies show that 45% to 50% of adolescent victims of violent deaths had been drinking alcohol before their death, as evidenced by blood alcohol concentrations. In addition, alcohol has been implicated in a majority of drowning, fire-related deaths and fatal falls. Alcohol use contributes substantially to the
24
burden of mental health disorders affecting adolescents. Moreover, children and adolescents who engage in alcohol and other drug use often engage in other risk taking behaviors. There is a correlation between alcohol use and sexual activity, including initiation of sexual intercourse for some adolescents. Most date rapes involve the use of alcohol by one or both partners. Those adolescents who use tobac