Nanocatalyst for Sustainable Production of Biofuels and
Chemicals from Malaysia Bioresources
Y.H. Taufiq-Yap
PhD, CChem., FRSC (UK), FMIC (Msia), AMIChemE (UK)
Laboratory for Sustainable Bioenergy and Chemicals Catalysis Science and Technology Research Centre
Faculty of Science Universiti Putra Malaysia
Intro to Nanocatalysts
Catalysis is the increment of the rate of certain chemical reaction due to the additional of chemical substance known as catalyst.
Catalyst is the substance that accelerates a chemical reaction without itself being affected. It will provide the sites for the reactants to be activated and interacted together.
Nanocatalyst is a substance or material with catalytic properties that has at least nanoscale dimension, either externally or in terms of internal structures
11http://www.the-infoshop.com/report/bc21463_nanocatalysts.html
How it Work?
• Changes activation energy
• Offers an alternative reaction pathway
• New pathway requires less kinetic energy in molecular collisions
Objectives of preparation
To produce a catalyst with:
– 100% selectivity,
– extremely high activity, – low energy consumption, – and long lifetime.
This can be achieved only by precisely controlling the
size, shape, spatial distribution, surface composition
and electronic structure, and thermal and chemical
stability of the individual nanocomponents
Advantages and characteristics of nanocatalyst
Overcome the issue of mass transfer limitation
Reduce the Cost of Biodiesel Production
High range of possible chemistries
High density of active site
Natural and synthetic
High catalytic activity
High surface area
Reusable
Illustration demonstrating the effect of the increased surface area provided by nanostructured materials
Size and surface area
• Nanocatalyst can fit where many of the traditional catalyst will not.
• By nanocatalyst being very
small in size, this property
creates a very high surface to
volume ratio. This increase
the performance of the
catalyst since there is more
surface to react with the
reactants
Benefits of Nanocatalyst in Industry
Minimum chemical waste Improved economy
Energy efficiency
Reduced global warming Waste water treatment
Optimum feedstock utilization
Safer catalysts and reagents
Type of nanocatalysts
Carbon
• Graphite
• CNTs
• Carbon black
• Buckyball
• Fullerene
• Inorganic
nanotubes (e.g.
Tungsten &
Boron nitride)
Metal oxides
• Aluminium
• Iron
• Silver
• Titanium dioxide
• Cobalt
• Iron oxide
• Cerum oxide
• Calcium oxide
• Zinc oxide
Others
• Clays
• Quantum dots
• Catalysts can be either heterogeneous or homogeneous, depending on whether a catalyst exists in the same phase as the substrate
Preparation of Nanocatalyst
•
Common methods to prepare nanoparticles:
– Attrition method, grinding the particles with ball mill
– Pyrolysis method, thermochemical decomposition of organic
materials at high temperature in inert environment.
– Hydrothermal synthesis method, by crystalizing the substance from
high temperature aqueous solution at high vapor pressure.
– Chemical reduction method, reduction of metal salt in solution by
reducing agent.
– Electrochemical reduction method, precursor metal ions are
reduced at the cathode using a sacrificial as the metal source
– Ligand displacement method, the displacement of the ligand in the
organometallic complex.
Current Application of Nanocatalysts
Nanocatalyst for biodiesel production
Nanocatalyst for chemicals production
Nanocatalyst in biomass
gasification for syngas production
Nanocatalyst in biomass pyrolysis
for bio-oil production
Current scenarios of fossil fuel and
bio fuel production
• Fossil-based oil has been the most important energy and fuel source since the mid of nineteen century.
• But there has been growing distress about an energy crisis caused by o Potential fossil-based oil depletion since it is nonrenewable
resource.
o High petroleum prices
o The effect of gas emissions from petroleum on the environment
• The need for a better energy security and alarm about high petroleum prices guided people to look for sustainable, renewable energy to decrease the reliance on fossil fuels.
• Biomass and biofuels-based energy resources have possibility to become the main providers of energy in the next century.
Biofuel energy demand!
It considers as an ideal fuel since it is biodegradable, sustainable, non-toxic, renewable and environmentally benign.
Biodiesel has high oxygen content around (11%) and consequently being a fuel with high combustion properties
It can be easily produced
• Biodiesel has lower oxidation stability than that of conventional diesel
• Biodiesel is most commonly produced from vegetable oils that may cause increase in the price of food i.e. (Food versus Fuel issue).
• Biodiesel has comparatively higher viscosity than conventional diesel
Biodiesel
Ad van tag es W ea kne ss
The chemistry of biodiesel production
Biodiesel is mono-alkyl esters of long-chain fatty acids derived from vegetable oils, waste coking oil and animal fats.
Nowadays; biodiesel is produced by:
Esterification
Transesterification
Potential Bio-resources for Biofuel
Bio Fuel
Palm fatty acid
distillate
Waste cooking oil
Microalgae
oil
Development of Nanoparticles Solid Acid and Bi- functional Catalysts for Production of Biodiesel from
Waste Cooking Oil
+
Waste cooking oil Methanol
Fe2O3-MnO-SO42-/ZrO2
Biodiesel
Waste oil Green Fuel
Z. Yaakob et al./Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 18(2013)184–193 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
10
0.12
0.9
1.6
0.5
4.5
0.6
0.07
million ton/year
The total waste cooking oil production in
different countries
Z. Yaakob et al./Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 18(2013)184–193
703 824 771
224
412 0
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800 900
Crude palm oil
Rapes seed oil
Soybean oil WCO Yellow grease
Price ( USdollar /ton)
Average prices of selected oils used in
biodiesel production
5g of hydrate ZrOCl2.8H2O were dissolved in 100 ml of deionised water and 30% ammonium hydroxide solution was added to form white precipitate the pH was adjusted to ≈ 9-10. Aging for 12h filtered, washed several times until( –ve) test of chloride ion and dried for about 24 h at 120oC
Fe(NO3)2.9H2O+Mn(NO3)2.4H2O+(NH4)2SO4+ Zr O(OH)2 Fe2O3-MnO-SO4/ZrO2 Stoichiometric amount of Fe(NO3)3·9H2O , Mn(NO3)2 ·4H2O
and (ammonium sulphate or ammonium metatungstate was added to the solution of zironyl hydroxide the mixture was left under vigorous stirring at room temperature for 4 h.
Finally the mixture was dried at 120 o C for 12 h and then calcined at 600 o C -3h.
Catalyst Preparation of Fe
2O
3-MnO-SO
42-/ZrO
2nanoparticles
Waste cooking oil + methanol +catalyst stir at 600 rpm at a selected temperature and time. Reaction was carried out using an autoclave reactor
Reaction mixture is centrifuged to separate catalyst.
And methanol is removed by evaporation
The glycerol is separated and WCOME’s was collected and further characterized
Biodiesel Production from Waste Cooking Oil
Effect of catalyst loading and methanol to oil molar ratio
92.2405 93.4771 94.7138 95.9505 97.1872
WCOME(%)
1.00 2.00
3.00 4.00
5.00
10.00 13.75 17.50 21.25 25.00
B: wt% of catalyst C : M eOH :Oil ratio
Effect of temperature and loading of catalyst
90.1055 91.8641 93.6227 95.3813 97.14
WCOME(%)
120.00 140.00
160.00 180.00
200.00
10.00 13.75 17.50 21.25 25.00
A: temperature C : M eOH :Oil ratio
Effect of temperature and methanol to oil molar ratio
Optimization of catalytic activity of Fe
2O
3-MnO- SO
42-/ZrO
2nanoparticles
TEM image of Fe2O3-MnO-SO42- /ZrO2 nanoparticles
87.3155 89.4314 91.5474 93.6633 95.7793
WCOME(%)
120.00 140.00 160.00 180.00 200.00 1.00
2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00
A: temperature B: wt% of catalyst
Types of FAME’s
Retention time (min.) Standard
FAME’s
FMSZ-16 FAME’s
Myristate 7.287 7.317
Palmitate 8.416 8.492
Palmitoleate 8.967 8.931
Stearate 9.566 9.733
Oleate 9.633 9.873
Linoleate 9.792 10.090
Standard FAME’s
FMSZ-16-Biodiesel
GC chromatogram for standard FAME’s and WCO-
Biodiesel
Potential bio-resources for biofuel production in Malaysia
Bio Fuel
Palm fatty acid
distillate
Waste cooking oil
Microalgae
oil
Carbon solid acid nanocatalyst for esterification of PFAD to biodiesel
Indeed, Malaysia known as the second largest crude palm oil producer which producing 18.8 million metric tons a year2.
Every year, over than 700,000 metric tones of PFAD has been produced only in Malaysia as a by-product from the refinery process2.
Feedstock used for palm biodiesel production
Crude palm oil Degumming
Earth bleaching Deoderizing
Refined bleached
oil Palm fatty
acid distillate
[2] Mielke, T., The price outlook of palm and lauric oils and impacts from the global vegetable oil markets–A fundamental approach, Paper presented at the Palm and Lauric Oils Conference & Exhibition Price Outlook (POC), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, March 8–10, 2010.
Characteristics:
• Non-edible feedstock
• yellowish solid at room temperature
• FFA content >80 wt.% (etc.: palmitic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, myristic acid, stearic acid) and also containing a small percentage of squalene, sterols, and vitamin E [2].
Applications:
• soap industry, animal feed industry, as raw material for cosmetics industry and, pharmaceutical industry.
Fatty acid Formula Carbon structure
Composition wt.%
Myristic acid C14H28O2 14:0 1.93 Palmitic acid C16H32O2 16:0 45.68
Stearic acid C18H36O2 18:0 4.25 Oleic acid C18H34O2 18:1 40.19 Linoleic acid C18H32O2 18:2 7.90 Table. Fatty acids composition of PFAD
Fig.3:GC-MS chromatogram of PFAD
Palmitic Oleic Linoleic
[2] Ab Gapor Md Top, 2010, Production and utilization of palm fatty acid distillate (PFAD).Lipid Technology 22(1):11-13.
Palm Fatty Acid Distillate (PFAD), Physical and
Chemical Properties
Preparation of carbohydrate-derived solid acid catalysts
Calcination at 400°C for 12h with N2 gas flow
Black powder of incomplete carbonized carbon after milling process
Washing process to remove an excess of sulphuric acid Sulfonated carbohydrate-
derived solid acid catalyst Carbohydrate
samples
Sulfonation with conc.
H2SO4 in N2 gas flow at 150°C for 12h
Fig.Preparation of sulfonated-glucose catalysis: (A) pyrolisis, (B) carbonization and (C) sulfonation.
Reflux Centrifugation Purification Product
PFAD + Methanol + catalyst
Speed:
3500 x g
Time: 15 min
PFAD
methyl ester
@ Biodiesel
FAME
Methanol
Methanol recovery and washing
Hot water
Biodiesel Production from PFAD
Catalytic activity of solid acid carbon catalyst in esterification of PFAD
0
80.8
92.1 94.6 95.4 95.8
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 1 2 3 4 5
FAME yield, %
FFA conversion, %
Reaction time, h
FAME yield FFA conversion 34.6
79.2
94.7 95 95.9 96.3
0 20 40 60 80 100
1 5 10 15 20 25
FFA conversion, %
Methanol/PFAD molar ratio
12.8
85 94.9 95.1 96.7 96.5
0 20 40 60 80 100
0 1 2 3 4 5
FFA conversion, %
Catalyst amount, wt.%
85.8 88.6
94.6 94.8 94.1
50 60 70 80 90 100
65 70 75 80 85
FFA conversion, %
Reaction temperature, °C
Reusability and leaching analysis of starch-derived solid acid catalyst
Reaction Conditions Reaction
Temperature
75 °C Reaction Time 4 h Methanol-to-PFAD
Molar Ratio
13.6:1 Catalyst Loading 3.6
wt.%
• The reusability study has been conducted in order to study the stability and reusability of the catalyst.
• The Fig. presented the ability of starch-derived solid acid catalyst to reuse which was up to 5 times before the conversion is below than 80%.
• The leaching analysis revealed that the leached S from the catalyst was in the limit. (limit for S content: ASTM < 0.0015, EN < 0.0010 wt.%).
Fig. The trends of reusability of the catalyst and leaching of the S content 94.6 91.6
87.3 85.5
81.2 75.2
0
0.0005 0.001 0.0015 0.002
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
1 2 3 4 5 6
S content (ppm)
FAME yield
Reaction cycle
FFA conversion
Properties of FAME product
Properties Units Methods PFAD
biodiesela
ASTM D6751-02
EN 14214
Viscosity at 40°C
mm2/s ASTM D445 4.85 ± 0.03 1.9 ̶ 6.0 3.5 ̶ 5.0
Acid value Mg KOH/g ASTM D664 0.65 ± 0.01 0.80 max 0.50 max Density at 15°C Kg/m3 ASTM D4052 875 ± 2.6 870-900 860-900
Cloud point °C ASTM D2500 13.2 ± 0.17 -3 to 12 -
Moisture content
mg/kg ASTM D6304 0.03 ± 0.08 0.03 max -
Pour point °C ASTM D97 12 ± 0.21 -15 to 10 -
Flash point °C ASTM D93 178 130 min 120 min
a PFAD biodiesel in this work was produced by esterification of the PFAD using RSM optimized condition at 13.6:1 of methanol-to-PFAD molar ratio, 75°C reaction temperature, 3.6 wt.% of catalyst and 4 h reaction time.
The properties of the PFAD biodiesel produced was in the range of the ASTM D6751-02 and EN 14214 standards. Except for the pour point and cloud point was respectively slightly higher as compared to the ASTM D6751-02 standard. This is due to the highly saturated FFA in PFAD which results in high value of pour point and cloud point
Accepted for publication in Renewable Energy on
17 March 2015
Potential bio-resources for biofuel production in Malaysia
Bio Fuel
Palm fatty acid
distillate
Waste cooking oil
Microalgae
oil
Calcium Methoxide as Heterogeneous Nanocatalyst
for Transesterification of Nannochloropsis Oculata
Microalgae’s Oil to Biodiesel
Biodiesel Generation
[1]Alam, F., Date, A., Rasjidin, R., Mobin, S., Moria, H., & Baqui, A. (2012).Procedia Engineering, 49, 221-227.
[2] Li, Y., Horsman, M., Wang, B., Wu, N., & Lan, C. Q. (2008)..Applied microbiology and biotechnology, 81(4), 629-636
EDIBLE OIL
MICROALGAE OIL
Unicellular [1]
naturally found in fresh water and marine
environment [1]
capable of fixing CO2in the atmosphere[2]
can grow rapidly [2]
NON-EDIBLE OIL
Plant source Seed oil
content (% oil by
wt. in biomass)
Oil yield (l oil/ha/year)
Land use (m2year/
kg biodiesel
)
Biodiesel productivity
(kg biodiesel/ha/year)
Jatropha (Jatropha curcasL.) 28 741 15 656
Palm oil (Elaeis guineensis) 36 5366 2 4747
Microalgae (low oil content) 30 58,700 0.2 51,927
Microalgae (medium oil content) 50 97,800 0.1 86,515
Microalgae (high oil content) 70 136,900 0.1 121,104
Why microalgae for biofuel?
High oil yield (15-300 time more oil than traditional crops Above 50 %, some as high as 75 %)
-Microalgae: 5000 to 15000 gallons/acre/year -Oil Palm: 635 gallons/acre/year
-Sunflower: 102 gallons/arce/year
Lesser land requirement: limited land resources make solved the potential biomass insufficient
Food vs fuel: does not compete with food supply
Adaptability & high growth rate: > 50 times faster than land based plant & consumes very less water compare to land crops
High CO2 capture capacity: high photosynthesis efficiencies (CO2convert to O2) – algae in carbon cycle
Preparation of Ca(OCH 3 ) 2 nanoparticles
Pure metallic oxide precursor
CaO
Alcohol reagent Methanol
Formation of white slurry solid base
+
Reflux & stir at 65 oC for 2 – 12 hours
Remove MeOH using rotary evaporator
Dry in the Oven at 378 K for 1h
50 ml min-1 N2flow
Ca(OCH3)2
TEM images of Ca(OCH3)2nanoparticles
Cultivation, Extraction & Catalytic test: crude microalgae derived oil (MDO)
Biodiesel production from Algae Oil
Influence of (a) methanol ratio, (b) catalyst concentration and (c) reaction time on transesterification of extracted N. oculata lipid from dried microalgae: catalyst dosage 3 % (a), reaction time 3 h (a, b), reaction temperature 60oC (a, b).
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
10 20 30 40 50 60
FAME yield (%)
MeOH ratio (%) 6.95
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0 3 6 9 12 15
FAME yield (%)
Catalyst loading (%)
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
FAME yield (%)
Reaction time (h)
Ca(OCH3)2 CaO NaOH
Transesterfication condition: reaction temperature of 60oC, 12 wt. % of catalyst and methanol/oil ratio of 30:1.
Transesterfication condition: reaction temperature of 60oC, 4 wt. % of catalyst and methanol/oil ratio of 30:1.
Transesterfication condition: reaction temperature of 60oC, 3 wt. % (1 mol) of catalyst and methanol/oil ratio of 12:1.
13.79
14.04 17.83
30.57
85.44
1.57
60.11
83.60
61.56 92.02
13.79
97.60 92.00
83.02 87.46
82.16 85.53
63.17 73.55
(a) (b)
(c)
Catalytic Activity
0 20 40 60 80 100
1 run 2 run 3 run 4 run 5 run 6 run
FAME yield (%)
Run times
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
C14:0 C16:0 C18:0 C16:1 C18:1 C18:2 C:20:4 C20:5 C22:6
Concentration (%)
Fatty acid methyl ester profile
FAME yield > 90 %
35.43 %
27.54 %
Unsaturated FAME > 50 %
Methyl ester Carbon Methyl laurate C 12:0 Methyl myristate C 14:1 Methyl palmitate C 16:0 Methyl palmitoleate C 16:1 Methyl stearate C 18:0 Methyl oleate C 18:1 Methyl linoleate C 18:2 Methyl arachidate C 20:0 Methyl docosanoate C 22:0
All cis 5,8,11,14,17- methyl eicosapentenoate
C 20:5(n3)
Reusability
Malaysia generates 80 m tonnes of dry palm biomass per year
Annual availability
9.6 46.4
0.8 4.1
1.4 6.7
1.4 6.9
3.0 Per ha
(tonnes of dry biomass)
National total (m tonnes of dry biomass) Site of
production Plantation
Mill Mill
Mill
Plantation 14.4
Biomass Type
Shells (PKS) EFB
Empty Fruit Bunch
Fiber
Mesocarp fibre
Fronds
Trunks
12.2 (wet weight)
59.3 (wet weight)
POME Mill
Palm Oil Mill Effluent
Biogas from Palm Oil Mill Effluent (POME)
• About 0.65 – 0.675 m3of POME is generated for every 1 tonne of FFB processed
• 56 million tonnes of POME generated in 2009
• Biogas is produced during the decomposition of organic matters in anaerobic pond
• It contains about 60-70 % Methane (CH4), 30-40 % Carbon Dioxide (CO2) and trace amount of Hydrogen Sulphide, (H2S)
• Methane - the global warming potential – 21 times higher than CO2
• Potential yield: 1 m3of completely digested POME produces 28 -38 m3 biogas
• 1624 million m3 of biogas generated in 2009
• GHG emission reduction: 16 – 20 million tonnes CO2 eq.
CO
2CH
4CH
4CO
2CH
4Trapping of Biogas at Palm Oil Mills
• Under National Key Economic Areas (NKEA) – palm oil sector: all palm oil mills to have biogas trapping
facilities by 2020
• 16 – 20 million tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent per year
mitigated
Biogas Plant at Palm Oil Mills
• Two technologies: digester and covered lagoon
•Biogas application:
- Electricity generation - on & off grid - CHP - steam and heat
- Co-firing in biomass boiler and diesel genset to reduce the utilization of the palm shell and diesel
• Power potential: 1 -2 MW from 60 t/hr POM
Ponding system of POME treatment
Bell Eco Power Sdn. Bhd., Batu Pahat
Biogas Capture from POME
Electricity Generation from Biogas
– 1
stGrid-Connected Biogas Plant (1.7 MW)
National Key Economic Areas (NKEA)
NATIONAL BIOGAS IMPLEMENTATION (EPP5)
To produce hydrogen
Biogas
Production: 28m3/m3 POME Composition
CH4 : 62.5 % CO2 : 37 %
H2S : 150-200 ppm
CH 4 + CO 2 2CO + 2H 2
Dry Reforming of Biogas
Catalyst:
Noble metal catalysts:
Pt, Ru and Rh - high activity and more resistant to coke formation but very expensive and limited availability.
Ni-based catalysts:
- more suitable,
- high activity, availability and low price.
- but more sensitive to carbon deposition and difficult to prevent
sintering of nickel.
Fig. 7: XRD pattern of reduced catalysts
• XRD patterns showed that Ni metallic phase formed after reduction process
• The Ni particles are relatively small of around 13-15 nm. The differences are due to the
different method used
Ni/CS-S Ni/CS-D
NiCo/CS-D NiPt/CS-D Sample CeO2a
(nm)
NiOb (nm)
Nic (nm) Ni/CS-S 8.07 10.63 14.96 Ni/CS-D 5.53 8.94 13.39 NiCo/CS-S 7.16 9.30 14.85 NiCo/CS-D 5.47 8.03 12.75
NiPt/CS-D 6.08 9.80 12.82 Fig. 8: TEM images of selected reduced catalysts Table 2: Crystalline particle size
20 30 40 50 60 70 80
Ni JCPDS 004-0850 CeO2 JCPDS 043-1002
NiPt/CS-D
= SiO2
= CeO2
= Ni
NiCo/CS-D
Ni/CS-D NiCo/CS-S
Ni/CS-S
2 (degree)
Intensity (a.u.)
Crystallographic & Particle sizes
52
NiCo/CS-S
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
CO2Conversion(%)
Time on stream (min
Ni/CS-S Ni/CS-D NiCo/CS-S NiCo/CS-D
40 50 60 70 80 90 100
0 100 200 300 400 500 600
CH4Conversion (%)
Time on stream (min)
Ni/CS-S Ni/CS-D NiCo/CS-S NiCo/CS-D NiPt/CS-D
Catalytic performance of catalysts as a function of time at GHSV 3000 ml/g
cat.h
(a) CH
4conversion and (b) CO
2conversion
a b
Catalytic Evaluation
53
Catalyst activities over all catalysts
TGA profiles of spent catalysts The spent catalysts
• Catalyst prepared by sequenced method showed lower amount of mass loss, indicating lower carbon formation
• NiPt/CS-D gave low carbon formation due to the existence of Pt Carbon formation analysis: TGA
54
20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100
50 150 250 350 450 550 650 750 850
Mass loss (%)
Temp (oC)
Ni/CS-S Ni/CS-D NiCo/CS-S NiCo/CS-D NiPt/CS-D
Carbon formation analysis: SEM
55
SEM images of spent catalysts
Gasification
Air, heat, water & catalyst
Ash, Char & liquids
Gases to Fischer- Tropsch process:
H2, CO, CO2, CH4, C2H2, C2H4
Biomass feedstock
SNG - substitute Natural Gas; MTO – methanol to Olefin; MTG – methanol to gasoline
Postgraduate Students
• PhD
Theam Kok Leong Teo Siow Hwa
Sivasangar Seenivasagam Mohd. Lokman Ibrahim Mohd Sufri Matuli
Nurul Suziana Nawi Faris Jasim
• MSc
Surahim Rabiah
Lai Fook How Ivan Tan
Rachel Tang Duo Yao Davin Yap
Ezzah Mahmudah Arfaezah
Abdul Kareem al Sultan
Graduated Students
1. Dr. Tan Kian Peng (Metalysis Ltd., UK) 2. Dr. Looi Ming Hoong (UM)
3. Dr. Leong Loong Kong (UTAR)
4. Dr. Goh Chee Keong (Republic Polytech, Singapore) 5. Dr. Ali Asghar Rownaghi (Georgia, USA)
6. Dr. Tang Wen Jiunn(KDU)
7. Dr. Wong Yee Ching(UM Kelantan) 8. Dr. Lee Hwei Voon(UM)
9. Dr. Fath Elrahman Hamid (Sudan)
10. Dr. Mohd. Hasbi Abdul Rahim (UM Pahang) 11. Mr. Saw Chaing Sen (INTEL Malaysia)
12. Mr. Ahmad Raslan Mat Hussin (Bernas) 13. Ms. Ita Jong (Canada)
14. Mr. Peh Tian Hai (ICI) 15. Dr. Lim Gin Keat (USM) 16. Dr. Nor Asrina Sairi (UM) 17. Mr. Theam Kok Leong (UTAR) 18. Ms. Nurul Fitriyah Abdullah
19. Mr. Tang Lok Hing (Republic Polytech, Singapore) 20. Sudarno (Indonesia)
21. Asiah Abdullah (UiTM) 22. Suhaizam Suhaimi (UIA) 23. Yuen Choon Seong
24. Aqilah Noor 25. Shajaratunnur 26. Nur Faizal
27. Nur Asikin Mijan
THANK YOU TERIMA KASIH
ありがとうございました 감사
مكل اركش
謝謝/
谢谢