26 3.9 OEBS
CHAPTER 4: RESULT AI\iD DISCUSSION
4.3 Simulation parameters
V.lo(it,inl.t conrtant.t 3 m,r5
'Vclocaty oud(t
Fluid flor" diraction
Material Water as
liquid
Stecl as solidDensity
(Kg/m')
998.3 8030Viscosity
(I(dm-s)
0.001003Page I 22
\ V
t
.\t
\/ )
I It
I t
>+
,l
Figure l2:
Meshed Ball ValvePage | 23
4.4
Simulation
Result and DiscussionThe ball valve was analyzed using Computational Fluid Dynamic (CFD) analysis
by ANSYS FLUENT
softwareto
checkthe effect of fluid flow on variation
valve's opening degrees.The fluid
domain has been setto
water wherethe velocity of
water travel throughis 3
m/s.Figure
13to
17 that were obtainedfrom Coryutational Fluid
Dynamic (CFD) analysis using ANSYSFLUENT
clearly indicated the increasing speed and pressureof
thefluid flow right
afterit
travel through the orifrce where the seat and theball
were placed. This situation can bring a damages to the seatof
theball ralve
as the erosion occurred where the highvelocity fluid tavel to
the surfaceof
the seat. The particles that containedin
thefluid
can damages the surfaceof
the seat and caused the ball valve leaked.o
Result of Ball valveat
l00o/o openingO O-O. (m)
I
o,o2
Figure
13: Velocity vector of ball valver
F.-Page | 24
Figure
14: Velocitycontourof
ball valve O.O. (m)-_---__,:-..:l
o.02
O.(}. (rn) o.02
Figure
15: Pressure contour of ball valvePage | 25
o
-o.02
O,O4 (m)
t, i- , ....,:1 , ,..,;
Figure
16: Velocity streamline#l
of ball valveO O.O4 (m)
E"r -'r
Figure
17: Velocity streamline #2 of ball valvee.78re1
o.(xrcc+oo(, [m.^-11
l..
?Page I 26
Figure
18: Flow Rate Vs Valve Opening DegreeThe graph Flow rate Vs Valve Opening Degree above shown that the incneases of the valve opening
will
be affecting theflow
rate. The relationship is linear where when the valve opening increases, theflow
rate also increasing.Page | 77
In
order to validate the result obtained from the analysis of the ball valve, the seat of the ball valve were analysis using the same method to see clearly the effectof fluid flow
the seat itself. As shown in Figure 19 to 23,it's
proved that the high velocity and pressure occurred around the seat as thefluid
travel throughit.
The increasing in speed as thefluid
travelled through the seat as shown in Figure 19,will
resulted the seat to darnage as the erosion occurred.O.Ot (m)
---_]
o.q)5
Figure
19: Velocity vector of the seatt-
2Page | 28
o
o.ol (m)-orou
I
F'igure 20: Velocity streamline #1 vector
ofthe
seato
o.o1 (m)-;s;.--r
Figure 2l:
Velocity streamline #2 of the seatPage | 29
Figure 22: Velocity contour of the seat
-7 -1.
-t
-1 -2
o
-o.oo5
o.o1 (m)
O O.O1 (m)
-o.oo5
Figure
23: Pressure contour of the seatI
I I I
Page | 30
For
additional testing, the seat also being tested using Static Structural analysis method wherethe
seat subjectedto
pressurewhich is 6.9
MPaor
equalto
the valve working pressure, 1000psi.
Basedon the result obtained from the simulation
analysis, the deformation occurred as the valve subjectedto
6.9 MPa pressure. Although the value is small which is 0.124 mm, but iswill
gradually increases over time whichwill
contribute to valve leaking. The Von Misses stress is 50.875 MPa.o
Seat Static Structural Analysis ParametersMeteriel
Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)Youngts
Modulus
500 MPaPoisson
Ratio
0.46Seat
Diameter 6mm
Prcssure Subjected 5.9 MPa
Page | 31
D IIPL}CEilETT
t[EDrt llrD .1
rltc.r
Dt'I .. L2q211
tDD 3 eole
02 : ll9: Il
Flgure
24: Seat DeformationPage | 32
roDll. lour"10, 'IED'I
t,ul -l' tlE.l'
llaQv (lu6) E -.laata?
I -E-Ort r .to-c?l
tEP 3 eOIt
O2 : il6: 3?
lo. I?9 20. 353 30. 528 {0. ?o2 so.8?6
Figure 25: Von Misses stress of the seat
Page I 33
4.5 Analysis
for
DesignImprovement
of the seatThere are two material have been tested in order
to
improve the sealing capabilityof
the seat. The materials that been tested using Static Structural anelysis are Thermoplastic Polyurethane (TPU) and
Nitinol which
is the combinationof nickel
andtitanium alby.
TPU
usually usedfor
pipes and hoses asit
resistanceto
abrasion and also resistarceto oil
and grease. On the other hand,Nitinol
arethe
materialwith
unusual propertic.sIt
super elastic characteristic have made
it
suitablefor
medical purposes such as thewires
which are used to locate and mark the breast tumorto
get the accuracyin
surgery. Thp1G arennny
advantages of TPU andNitinol
as shown below:i.
ThermoplasticPolyurethane(TPU)Features:o
Resistance to abrasiono
Outstanding low temperature performanceo
High shear strengtho
HighElasicity
o
Goodoil
and gr€ase resistanceii. Nitinol
(Nickel and Titaniumalloy)
Features:o
Super elastic materialo
Biocornpatibility and corrosion resistanceo
Can withstand highte,ryeratue
Pr:13.
*
Static Structural analysis parametersMateriel
Thermoplastic Polyurethane
(TPU)
Nitinol
Young's Modulus
27lvlPa
83000 MPaPoisson
Retio
0.45 0.33
Seat
Diameter
6mm 6mm
Pressure Subjected
1000 psi
@6.9MPa
1000 psi @ 6.9 MPaBased on the result obtained,
Nitinol
had less deformation comFared toTpu
aodabo
PTFE. The rnaximum deformation occurred when 1000 psi pressure subjectc4 it onty deformed about 0.000698 which is far bettercoryared with
theorigi"al st lratcri.l
which
is PTFE. Based on the this analysis only, we can determinedrhrt Nitiml
istb
zuitable material to replace PTFE in constructed the seat for ball nalve as it
hd
supcr elastic characteristic thatwill
decreased the seat leakage due todeformatbn
PXC 135
D IIPLACEIIEN
trEP=l lntl =t llE=l D8, =?-268
s, t toL
05.
l,
.taDiarneter after defrlrrratl nn
Figure
26: Deformation of TPU seat materialP.ge | 36
roDel. lol.ultotr
'TEPEl.
tul EL I lllf =l
lEQl, ( Av6!
DE,, =2.286 lE =s-096 Iq =50-Esl
E' t tolt
O5: ltl: Ot
IO. I8 20. 3.tg 30 _ srs {o- 643
Figure
2TzYonMisses stress of TPU seat materialAnother solution to overcome the valve leakage due to seat
faild to gir€ sting
capability is by design the
two
layer seat. Thefirst
layerwill
used to hold thc ball insidc the valve to give the sealing capability as the other layerwill
acts asredrdam
inca*
tbe
first
layer is failed to give sealing capability to the ball. By this way, thc valrrcwill still
operate with optimum performance. Figure 29until32
has showntb Stfih
stnrctural result of the double layer seat. Although the deformation arc
slightl! higb
from the single layer seat that were used in the original design,
hrt it will afEalng tb
performance of ball valve to operate. The ball valve still can operate errcn thortrh
tb
firs
layer of the seat failed due to darnages as the other hyerwill
givestb
sc-lrqgcapability to the valve.
Et
137D I'DLACEtrEN ttEP=l SIrl =.1.
t lllE=l E =.69EE-03
lar r tcll
03 0a aa
Dr arreter aftcr dtfrrrnrat on
Orr3tnal
Dr rr'rcttr
Figure
28: DeformationofNitinol
seat materialPra ltt
toDal. 30l.urI0r trEP=l
'ul -r
llErJ,
EQl' (Alre )
E =-69C8-03 3 E5-106 E 150.?9
sGt t tctl
Ot: et:
tt
lo. r82 zo- 334 30. {46 ro- 638 as. ?la EO.7t